Dinar Recaps 20 4/24/26 Dinar Recaps 20 4/24/26

The Man Who Ran US Treasury In 2008 Just Told Everyone To Prepare...

The Man Who Ran US Treasury In 2008 Just Told Everyone To Prepare...

MarkMoss: 4-23-2026

The man who ran the US Treasury back in 2008, just told the country to prepare for the break the glass plan. Now, hat's the headline but that's not the real story.

The real story is what the Treasury did quietly, just one hour later. I'm talking about $15 billion bought back in a single morning.

In the world of global finance, few voices carry as much weight as Henry Paulson. As the former US Treasury Secretary who navigated the 2008 financial crisis, his insights into market stability are often viewed as a bellwether for what’s to come.

The Man Who Ran US Treasury In 2008 Just Told Everyone To Prepare...

MarkMoss: 4-23-2026

The man who ran the US Treasury back in 2008, just told the country to prepare for the break the glass plan. Now, hat's the headline but that's not the real story.

The real story is what the Treasury did quietly, just one hour later. I'm talking about $15 billion bought back in a single morning.

Recently, Paulson has issued a stark warning: the United States is inevitably heading toward a significant financial “wall.”

Unlike the reactive measures taken during the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, Paulson is urging policymakers to prepare a “break the glass” emergency plan in advance. This isn’t just theory; we are already seeing the gears move behind the scenes.

Shortly after his warning, the US Treasury quietly repurchased $15 billion of its own debt in a single day—a dramatic escalation in buyback activity designed to control yields and prevent a sudden dislocation in the debt market.

To understand why this is happening, we have to look at the mechanics of the “debt spiral.” Historically, the US has relied on foreign nations like China and Japan to be the primary buyers of its debt. However, trust in these “printable” assets is waning. Factors such as geopolitical tensions and the freezing of foreign bank accounts have led these major holders to reduce their Treasury positions by significant percentages.

When demand for debt drops, the government must offer higher yields to attract buyers. This increases the cost of borrowing for the nation, often forcing the Federal Reserve to intervene by printing money to purchase the remaining debt. This cycle—increased money supply leading to currency devaluation and inflation—creates a feedback loop that has historically destabilized economies ranging from the UK and Greece to Argentina.

As sovereign nations distance themselves from US debt, a new trend is emerging. Instead of hoarding paper currency, countries like Saudi Arabia and India are significantly increasing their gold reserves.

Gold represents a “scarce” or “unprintable” asset—something that cannot be devalued by a central bank’s printing press or seized easily through digital intervention.

This philosophy is also taking root in the corporate world. Most notably, the company formerly known as MicroStrategy has transitioned into a “Bitcoin development company,” becoming the largest corporate holder of the asset. By accumulating nearly 4% of the total Bitcoin supply, they are championing a new treasury management philosophy: moving away from short-term stock picking and toward long-term asset preservation.

The fundamental question every investor must now ask is one of asset quality: “How much of my portfolio is in assets that can be printed or seized, versus those that are scarce and secure?”

Printable Assets: These include cash, bonds, and traditional debt instruments. While liquid, they are vulnerable to inflation and the political risks of the issuing body.

Unprintable Assets: These include gold, productive land, and Bitcoin. These are assets with a fixed or limited supply that provide a hedge against currency devaluation.

In light of these shifts, financial experts are urging individuals to develop their own “Treasury Doctrine.” This involves a strategic allocation between printable and unprintable assets, tailored to your specific long-term goals rather than following the daily noise of the stock market.

The warnings from figures like Henry Paulson and the proactive moves by the US Treasury suggest that the global financial regime is undergoing a fundamental transition. While governments debate emergency protocols, savvy corporations and sovereign nations are already repositioning their capital into scarce, durable assets.

For the modern investor, the message is clear: the era of “blindly holding cash” may be coming to an end. Understanding the difference between printable and unprintable wealth is no longer just a theoretical exercise—it is a necessary step for navigating the financial landscape of the future.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tO_KDxjJoE

Dinar Recaps 20 4/24/26 Dinar Recaps 20 4/24/26

This Strategic U.S. Gold Deal Is Flying Under the Radar | Andy Schectman & Michelle Makori

This Strategic U.S. Gold Deal Is Flying Under the Radar | Andy Schectman & Michelle Makori

Miles Franklin Media: 4-21-2026

Michelle Makori, President & Editor-in-Chief, Miles Franklin Media, interviews Andy Schectman, Founder & CEO of Miles Franklin Precious Metals, on a major gold development that’s flying under the radar and what it could signal for the global financial system.

As the Iran conflict is in its third week, gold has surprisingly weakened instead of rallying. At the same time, the U.S. is quietly facilitating a gold deal with Venezuela, while gold has also become America’s most valuable U.S. export in three of the last four months.

This Strategic U.S. Gold Deal Is Flying Under the Radar | Andy Schectman & Michelle Makori

Miles Franklin Media: 4-21-2026

So what’s really happening? Is the U.S. indirectly accumulating gold? Where is all this gold going?

And could this signal a shift toward a new monetary system?

Schectman breaks down the hidden dynamics behind global gold flows, the possibility of gold being used in trade for critical minerals, and why trust in the financial system may be breaking down.

In this episode of The Real Story with Michelle Makori

The U.S.-Venezuela gold deal and why it matters

Why gold is flowing in and out of the U.S. simultaneously

Is the U.S. quietly accumulating gold again?

Speculation around gold-for-critical-minerals trade

China, supply chains, and strategic resource control

Gold revaluation and the debt crisis

BIS comments on silver and market structure

Private credit risks and systemic contagion

Why trust in financial markets is breaking down

00:00 Introduction

01:51 Venezuela Gold Deal

05:24 Is the US Secretly Buying?

08:44 Gold Exports Surge

13:27 China vs Switzerland Theories

16:46 Comex Imports and Deliveries

28:44 Debt Math and Revaluation

36:43 Gold Revaluation Path

38:07 July 4th Speculation

39:15 Silver Selloff Explained

40:55 BIS Calls Out Comex

44:15 Global Silver Supply Squeeze

48:54 Private Credit Time Bomb

57:18 Inflation and Fed Outlook

01:05:13 Closing Remarks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydu15sijyug

DINARRECAPS8 4/24/26 DINARRECAPS8 4/24/26

Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Friday Afternoon 4-24-26

Good Afternoon Dinar Recaps,

Market Strain Rising: Oil Near $100 as Shipping Disruptions Intensify

Escalating tensions in key trade routes are driving energy prices higher, increasing inflation risk and pressuring global financial stability

Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Friday Afternoon 4-24-26

Good Afternoon Dinar Recaps,

Market Strain Rising: Oil Near $100 as Shipping Disruptions Intensify

Escalating tensions in key trade routes are driving energy prices higher, increasing inflation risk and pressuring global financial stability

OVERVIEW (KEY POINTS)

Global markets are reacting to renewed disruption in critical shipping lanes, pushing oil prices toward the $100 level and triggering heightened volatility across financial systems. The instability centers around constrained movement through major energy corridors.

This is happening now as geopolitical tensions continue to impact global shipping activity and supply chains, reducing the flow of oil and increasing uncertainty around future availability. The result is a rapid repricing of energy risk.

Key players include global energy producers, shipping operators, and central banks monitoring the impact of rising oil prices on inflation and economic growth.

The broader implication is clear: energy-driven volatility is feeding directly into financial markets, increasing the likelihood of broader systemic stress.

KEY DEVELOPMENTS

1. Oil Prices Climb Toward $100

Energy markets are reacting to tightening supply conditions.

Crude prices approaching $95–$100 per barrel
Reflects rising concern over supply disruption and demand imbalance

2. Shipping Disruptions Limit Global Supply

Key maritime routes remain unstable.

Reduced vessel movement through critical energy corridors
Ongoing risk of further restrictions or delays

3. Inflation Pressures Re-Emerge

Higher energy costs are feeding into the economy.

Fuel prices contributing to rising global inflation expectations
Increased costs impacting production and transportation

4. Central Banks Face Renewed Pressure

Policy decisions are becoming more complex.

Higher inflation limits ability to cut interest rates
Growth concerns conflict with inflation control efforts

WHY IT MATTERS

This development highlights the central role of energy in global financial stability. When oil prices rise sharply, the effects cascade through the economy, impacting everything from transportation to manufacturing.

Markets are increasingly sensitive to geopolitical disruptions, leading to volatility in commodities, currencies, and equities. This reduces predictability and increases risk.

For policymakers, the situation presents a difficult balance between controlling inflation and supporting economic growth. Missteps could amplify instability.

At the system level, this reinforces a growing pattern: external shocks are driving financial conditions more than internal policy decisions.

WHY IT MATTERS TO FOREIGN CURRENCY HOLDERS

Energy-importing currencies may weaken as costs rise
Purchasing power declines due to inflation pressures
Capital flows may shift toward stronger or resource-backed economies
Exchange rate volatility increases across global markets

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GLOBAL RESET

Pillar 1: Energy-Driven Financial Stress

Rising oil prices reinforce a system where external supply shocks drive economic conditions, increasing systemic vulnerability.

Pillar 2: Structural Pressure on Monetary Policy

Central banks are constrained by competing priorities, contributing to long-term shifts in how financial systems are managed.

CONCLUSION

The move toward $100 oil underscores the fragility of the current global system, where supply disruptions can quickly translate into financial instability.

As energy prices rise, the pressure spreads across markets, affecting inflation, growth, and policy decisions. The situation remains fluid, with significant implications for the global economy.

This is not an isolated event—it reflects a broader trend of increasing sensitivity to geopolitical and supply chain disruptions.

When energy prices surge, the entire financial system feels the strain—and the pressure for structural change grows stronger.

Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive

Sources

~~~~~~~~~~

Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble

Newshound's News Telegram Room Link

RV Facts with Proof Links Link

RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link

Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX

Follow Fast Facts

Seeds of Wisdom Team™Website

Thank you Dinar Recaps

Dinar Recaps 20 4/24/26 Dinar Recaps 20 4/24/26

Iraq News Posted by Tishwash at TNT 4-24-2026

TNT:

Tishwash: The Iraqi parliament adjourns its session and decides to extend its legislative term.

The House of Representatives adjourned its regular session on Thursday, after completing the discussion of a number of legislative items, as part of its work.

The council's media department said in a press statement: "The House of Representatives has begun the first reading of the proposed Juvenile Welfare Law, and has completed reading 50 articles within it."

She added that “the Council also completed the first reading of the proposed first amendment to Law No. (18) of 2018 concerning the protection of teachers, instructors, supervisors and educational counselors.”

She noted that “the council also decided to extend its legislative session for 30 days.”

TNT:

Tishwash: The Iraqi parliament adjourns its session and decides to extend its legislative term.

The House of Representatives adjourned its regular session on Thursday, after completing the discussion of a number of legislative items, as part of its work.

She noted that “the council also decided to extend its legislative session for 30 days.” link

Tishwash: Framework delayed PM decision to await US-Iran talks outcome, politician says

Leaders of the Coordination Framework postponed naming a prime minister candidate at a recent meeting in order to await the outcome of negotiations between Washington and Tehran, a politician familiar with the discussions has said.

“The apparent reason was the dispute over the two-thirds mechanism, but the underlying reason was waiting for the U.S.-Iran negotiations and what they will lead to,” Aziz al-Rubaie, secretary-general of the National Line Movement, said in a televised interview.

Rubaie said the meeting, held at the home of Hikma Movement leader Ammar al-Hakim, included Accountability and Justice Commission head Basim al-Badri waiting in a nearby room with a political vision prepared in the event he was named as a candidate. Leaders decided at the last moment to delay the announcement, he said.

Rubaie predicted the framework would not reach conclusions at its Friday meeting either, adding that Sudani and others may yet propose former Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi as a compromise candidate. He attributed the deadlock to “stubbornness and narcissism” among political leaders and said reliance on external actors had distorted decision-making. “We have reached a point where we wait for a signal from the Americans or approval from the Iranians to choose the prime minister,” he said.

The Coordination Framework’s nomination of Maliki in January drew direct U.S. opposition, with Trump warning Washington could halt support for Iraq if Maliki returned to power. The Dawa Party has maintained his candidacy “has not been withdrawn,” while rival factions say eight blocs back incumbent Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani against four for Maliki. Badri and Ihsan al-Awadi, director of Sudani’s office, remain under consideration as alternatives.

President Nizar Amedi has 15 days from his April 12 inauguration under Article 76 to task the largest bloc’s nominee with forming a government. link

************

Tishwash: Mahmoud Dagher: Trust between banks and the public is the foundation of financial stability and economic support.

Dr. Mahmoud Dagher, Chairman of the Board of Al-Nasik Islamic Bank, stressed that strengthening trust between banks and the public is one of the most important gains that the banking sector should achieve, noting that achieving success and financial stability cannot be achieved without building a strong relationship based on trust and transparency between banking institutions and citizens.

During his speech at the Governance, Risk Management and Compliance Forum, Dagher explained that consolidating this trust requires the actual application of governance and compliance principles, as they are the basic pillar for regulating banking work and ensuring transparency, accountability and commitment to modern professional and administrative standards.

He added that boards of directors bear a pivotal responsibility in this regard, by setting clear policies, following up on their implementation, and developing the banking work environment in a way that contributes to raising performance efficiency and achieving stability, which directly reflects on restoring public confidence in banks and strengthening the role of the banking sector in supporting the national economy. link

************

Tishwash: Urgent | Urgent warning from the International Monetary Fund: Iraq is the country most affected by the war and has no options for dealing with its economic repercussions.

A senior official at the International Monetary Fund said that Iraq does not have many options to deal with the economic repercussions of the Iran war other than reducing spending and temporarily resorting to dollar reserves, until a government is formed that can approve borrowing or request formal financing from international institutions.

Jihad Azour, the IMF’s Middle East and Central Asia director, told Al-Sharq platform on Thursday, as reported by Iraq Observer: “There is communication between the IMF and the Iraqi authorities to help the country mitigate the crisis.” He added: “There are discussions, as you know, they are now in the process of choosing a prime minister and forming a government. They currently have very limited ability to request financing or even to borrow due to legislative restrictions.”

He added: “They have to manage spending now in a way that prioritizes the most urgent needs. I think they are already using reserves, which is a temporary solution to a crisis that predates the start of the current war.”

Azour explained that the challenges Iraq is currently facing are due to “years of fiscal expansion,” noting that: “The Iraqi government was already facing severe financial constraints before the war due to a combination of excessive spending and very limited non-oil revenues,” noting that the IMF estimates the economy will contract by about 0.4% in 2025. link

Tishwash: Reassurance to employees: Expert says there is no need to worry about salaries despite the disruption in dollar shipments.

Economic expert Nabil Al-Marsoumi confirmed that there is no concern about employee salaries, pointing out that the current crisis is related to the disruption of dollar shipments and not their complete interruption.

Al-Marsoumi said, during his appearance on the “On the Ruler” program broadcast by Al-Furat satellite channel, that: “There are two narratives regarding the issue, the first links it to the circumstances of the war and the difficulty of transferring funds, while the other indicates that it is a measure related to Iraq’s position on regional tensions,” explaining that “this will not significantly affect meeting the demand of travelers, as it represents only about 7% of the total dollar funding and can be covered for several months with the availability of cash reserves at the Central Bank.”

He added that "the continuation of the disruption and its transformation into an American decision may affect the parallel market, especially with about $30 billion deposited in international banks," warning that "the real fear lies in the possibility of stopping bank transfers, given the direct impact this would have on imports."

He pointed out that "the decrease in the number of travelers and the volume of remittances due to the security situation in the region will limit the effects of the crisis," suggesting that "the repercussions of the rise in the dollar exchange rate will be limited at the moment."

He added that "Iraq is incurring daily financial losses as a result of the war," noting that "salaries are secured through the Central Bank's reserves, with options including printing currency, despite the inflationary risks it carries."

Regarding the energy file, Al-Marsoumi stressed that "the cooking gas crisis in Iraq is real as a result of the decline in oil production," noting that "increasing crude oil production will contribute to addressing the gap between supply and demand, while the shutdown of some oil fields and the difficulties in rehabilitating infrastructure have contributed to the loss of significant oil revenues."

Al-Marsoumi concluded by saying that “relying on exporting oil via tankers is a poor, expensive and dangerous means of transport, in addition to causing traffic jams; but it is the only option currently available to Iraq in the absence of alternatives,” indicating that “the cost of transport and shipping reaches about $15 per barrel.” link

Dinar Recaps 20 4/24/26 Dinar Recaps 20 4/24/26

News, Rumors and Opinions Friday 4-24-2026

Note: All intel should be considered as "Rumors" until we receive official announcements ...and “Rates and Dates” could change anytime until we get to the banks/redemption centers.

RV Excerpts from the Restored Republic via a GCR Update as of Fri. 24 April 2026

Compiled Fri. 24 April 2026 12:01 am EST by Judy Byington

Global Currency Reset:

The White Hat Military was (allegedly) in control of the foreign currency exchange/ bond redemption process and has already released funds for a Global Currency Reset across the World. Those GCR funds (allegedly) come directly from the US Treasury Department of Defense operations and go out to treasury departments in other countries. All Banks have signed non disclosure agreements. There will be an Internet Blackout.

Note: All intel should be considered as "Rumors" until we receive official announcements ...and “Rates and Dates” could change anytime until we get to the banks/redemption centers.

RV Excerpts from the Restored Republic via a GCR Update as of Fri. 24 April 2026

Compiled Fri. 24 April 2026 12:01 am EST by Judy Byington

Global Currency Reset:

Thurs. 23 April 2026 A2Z RV & DREAMZ GROUP CHAT: “I’m hearing that bondholders are receiving their notifications. This is important and (allegedly) verified truthful information. As we said yesterday, you are hearing these notifications are out now… the next marker we get are 4b notifications!!!! There are many types of bondholders too, we were looking at specific groups that would be notified just before 4b. Many Bondholders got paid in increments, 1%, 9% and then final payouts of 90%…. These are final payouts.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thurs. 23 April 2026 Bruce, The Big Call The Big Call Universe (ibize.com) 667-770-1866, pin123456#, 667-770-1865:

• Today a top source said that we have a pending start over the weekend based on what happens tomorrow Friday with the EBS Broadcast of Global announcements.

• Certain people in the US Treasury want the Tariff dividends ($2.000) to come out in a lump sum, or they could be done in monthly payments starting Sunday-Monday.

• R&R and DOGE payments will be in your money account (wallet) when you receive your redemption appointments.

• Notifications for Tier4b (us, the Internet Group) to receive exchange appointments could happen over the weekend, with exchanges starting by Tues. 28 April.

Thurs. 23 April 2026 CONFIRMED: Redemption Centers preparing for first appointments. …Web3.0 ISO 20022 on Telegram

Sources linked to U.S. Treasury offices report that the first GESARA exchanges were scheduled for April 2026.

Authorized Tier 4B participants are already receiving preparation alerts.

At the centers, biometric verification confirms identity before asset-backed exchanges for ZIM, Dinar, and Dong.

Participants will receive a quantum-linked card connected to their QFS wallet.

Read full post here: https://dinarchronicles.com/2026/04/24/restored-republic-via-a-gcr-update-as-of-april-24-2026/

************

Courtesy of Dinar Guru: https://www.dinarguru.com/

Stephen Present Trump means business...This is all positive stuff. It might seem negative. It might seem like, 'oh my gosh the USA is threatening to pull support for Iraq and the country is going to fall apart.' Everything is working together. We are watching a beautify puzzle come together and all of these little puzzle pieces that we are not even aware of as dinar investors, are all coming together. There's so much happening behind the scenes...We need Iranian influence out of Iraq before this [RV] event does take place.

Jeff Question: "All this talk about removing the zeros, is that in country only?" No, they can't do things only within country. Anytime the value of the dinar is posted on the CBI website that's publicly global. Nothing's just in Iraq.

Mnt Goat Article: “WASHINGTON HAS HALTED DOLLAR SHIPMENTS TO IRAQ UNTIL A NEW IRAQI GOVERNMENT IS FORMED” we learn one of the measures the US is using to threaten Iraq to disarm the Iranian backed militia is to cut off shipments of dollars to Iraq...These current U.S. sanctions appear to be about the sanctioning of the actual airborne flights of paper dollars into Iraq... Will it actually help Iraq more than hurt it in curbing the parallel market since the paper dollars will dry up. Maybe this is something that should have been done a long time ago?It will bring up the rate of the dinar.

The Fog of War Hides Dying COMEX - R.I.P.

Kinesis Money: 4-23-2026

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire highlights mounting evidence of the COMEX and LBMA losing control over gold pricing, with institutional investors moving away from paper markets and steady physical buying increasingly driving value, as sharp price swings fail to shake long-term demand. ‘

The precious metals expert points to rising global moves away from the dollar, stronger central bank buying, and tightening silver supply, showing how ongoing geopolitical tensions and a weakening dollar are supporting higher gold and silver levels, as physical demand continues to absorb selling pressure.

Timestamps:

00:00 Start

01:28 Comex open interest collapse signals structural breakdown

05:04 LBMA and CME price benchmarks losing influence

08:24 Sudden sell-offs and what is really driving them

12:08 Strung physical demand pushing back against price drops

20:29 Key global trends supporting gold and silver

29:11 Rising central bank buying & de-dollarisation shift unfolding quietly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwfII7ZFQF4

DINARRECAPS8 4/24/26 DINARRECAPS8 4/24/26

Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Friday Morning 4-24-26

Good Morning Dinar Recaps,

Ceasefire Illusion: Power Struggle Intensifies Across Middle East

Temporary truce masks deeper geopolitical conflict as control over energy routes and regional influence drives long-term strategy

Good Morning Dinar Recaps,

Ceasefire Illusion: Power Struggle Intensifies Across Middle East

Temporary truce masks deeper geopolitical conflict as control over energy routes and regional influence drives long-term strategy

OVERVIEW (KEY POINTS)

A recently extended ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon is being viewed not as a resolution, but as a temporary pause in a much larger geopolitical confrontation involving Iran, the United States, and regional actors. Tensions remain active beneath the surface despite formal agreements.

This is happening now as the United States signals a long-term negotiation strategy with Iran, balancing military pressure with diplomacy. At the same time, Iran is leveraging its position in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global energy chokepoint, to maintain influence.

Key players include the United States, Iran, Israel, and Hezbollah, all operating within a highly interconnected conflict environment where actions in one region quickly impact another.

The broader implication is clear: the ceasefire reflects strategic recalibration, not de-escalation, with major consequences for global energy markets and financial stability.

KEY DEVELOPMENTS

1. Ceasefire Extended but Conflict Persists

The Israel-Lebanon ceasefire has been prolonged without resolving underlying tensions.

Hostilities continue at lower intensity levels
Both sides treating the ceasefire as a temporary mechanism, not a final agreement

2. U.S. Signals Long-Term Negotiation Strategy

The United States is pursuing a controlled approach.

Military action delayed to allow diplomatic engagement
Strategy reflects pressure combined with negotiation leverage

3. Iran Leverages Strategic Geography

Tehran continues to apply pressure through key transit routes.

Strait of Hormuz remains a critical bargaining tool
Disruptions to shipping highlight global vulnerability to regional actions

4. Regional Conflicts Become Interconnected

Local conflicts are influencing broader dynamics.

Hezbollah’s alignment with Iran links Lebanon tensions to wider strategy
Israel’s actions tied to broader security concerns involving Iran

5. Internal Dynamics Add Uncertainty

Leadership transitions are shaping strategic positioning.

Iran emphasizing internal unity amid leadership changes
Stability narrative supports external negotiation posture

WHY IT MATTERS

This situation underscores how geopolitical conflicts can influence global financial conditions, especially when they involve critical energy routes. Even limited instability can have outsized economic effects.

Markets are sensitive to disruptions in oil supply, leading to volatility in energy prices, currencies, and equities. This creates uncertainty for investors and policymakers alike.

For policymakers, the challenge lies in managing both immediate risks and long-term strategic goals. Balancing diplomacy with deterrence becomes increasingly complex in a multi-layered conflict.

At the system level, this reflects a world where regional conflicts have global financial consequences, reinforcing interconnected risk.

WHY IT MATTERS TO FOREIGN CURRENCY HOLDERS

Energy-driven inflation may weaken currencies in importing nations
Safe-haven currencies may strengthen during uncertainty
Purchasing power may decline as fuel costs rise
Exchange rate volatility increases amid geopolitical risk

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GLOBAL RESET

Pillar 1: Geopolitical Control of Energy Flows

Control over strategic chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz reinforces the role of physical resources in financial power, influencing global economic stability.

Pillar 2: Prolonged Strategic Competition

The conflict reflects a shift toward long-duration geopolitical competition, where temporary agreements mask ongoing structural rivalry.

CONCLUSION

The extension of the ceasefire offers only temporary relief in a deeply complex conflict. Underlying tensions remain unresolved, and key actors continue to position themselves for long-term advantage.

As negotiations unfold, the situation remains fluid, with energy routes and regional alliances playing a central role in shaping outcomes.

This is not a step toward resolution—it is a pause within a broader strategic contest.

When ceasefires pause conflict without resolving it, the underlying pressures continue to build beneath the surface.

Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive

Sources

~~~~~~~~~~

A Message to Our Currency Holders

If you’ve been holding foreign currency for many years, you were not foolish.

You were not wrong to believe the global financial system would change.

What failed was not your patience — it was the information you were given.

For years, dates, rumors, and personalities replaced facts, structure, and proof. “This week” predictions created cycles of hope and disappointment that were never based on how currencies actually change.

That is not your failure.

Our mission here is different: • No dates • No rates • No hype • No gurus

Instead, we focus on:

• Verifiable developments • Institutional evidence

• Global financial structure • Where countries actually sit in the process

Currency value changes only come after sovereignty, trade, banking, settlement systems, and fiscal coordination are in place. History and institutions confirm this sequence.

You will see silence. You will see denials. That is not delay — that is discipline.

Protect your identity. Organize your documents. Verify everything.

Never hand your discernment to anyone who cannot show proof.

You deserve truth — not timelines.

Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™

~~~~~~~~~~

Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble

Newshound's News Telegram Room Link

RV Facts with Proof Links Link

RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link

Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX

Follow Fast Facts

Seeds of Wisdom Team™Website

Thank you Dinar Recaps

DINARRECAPS8 4/24/26 DINARRECAPS8 4/24/26

Iraq Economic News And Points To Ponder Friday Morning 4-23-26

Oil Futures Rise As Iran Tensions And Strikes Fuel Market Fears

2026-04-23 Shafaq News Crude oil futures spiked $5 a barrel on Thursday after reports that air defenses were engaging targetsover Tehran and of a power struggle between Iran's hardliners and moderates.

After spiking, the benchmarks pared gains. Brent crude futures ‌settled at $105.07 a barrel, gaining $3.16 or 3.1%. West Texas Intermediate futures finished at $95.85 a barrel, up $2.89, or 3.11%.

Oil Futures Rise As Iran Tensions And Strikes Fuel Market Fears

After spiking, the benchmarks pared gains. Brent crude futures ‌settled at $105.07 a barrel, gaining $3.16 or 3.1%. West Texas Intermediate futures finished at $95.85 a barrel, up $2.89, or 3.11%.

IRAN NEGOTIATOR QUITS

Israeli radio reported the resignation of Iran's top negotiator, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, from the team speaking to the U.S. through Pakistani intermediaries about ending the war.

Qalibaf's resignation was seen as a victory for hard line elements within the Iranian government.

Iranian news services said air defenses in Tehran were engaging targets over the city. That followed reports of drone attacks on Iranian Kurdish opponents of the Tehran government at a base in Iraq.

Iran flaunted its tightened grip over ⁠the Strait of Hormuz with video of its commandos storming a huge cargo ship, after the collapse of peace talks that Washington had hoped would open the important shipping corridor.

U.S. President Donald Trump said in a social media post that he had ordered the U.S. Navy "to shoot and kill any boat" mining the strait.

John Kilduff, partner with Again Capital, said the market was being buffeted by alternating news reports of Trump extending the ceasefire this week and threatening to sink Iranian mine-laying ships.

"Some people call it headline bingo, I call it headline roulette," Kilduff said. "I fear we're going to wake up one day and realize we're in a much worse (supply) position and prices are going to reset to a much higher level."

STRAIT OF HORMUZ TRANSIT STILL RESTRICTED

While Trump extended a ceasefire between the countries after a request by Pakistani mediators, Iran and the U.S. are still restricting transit of ‌ships ⁠through the strait, which carried about 20% of daily global oil supplies until the start of the war on February 28.

Trump, without providing evidence, said on Thursday the U.S. had "total control" over the strait, and that it was "sealed up tight" until Iran made a deal.

Iran seized two ships in the waterway on Wednesday. Trump has maintained a U.S. Navy blockade of Iran's trade by sea.

However, about 10.7 million barrels of Iranian crudeexports crossed through the strait and left the area blockaded by the ⁠U.S. Navy between April 13 and 21, data analytics company Vortexa said.

The U.S. military has intercepted at least three Iranian-flagged tankers in Asian waters and is redirecting them away from positions near India, Malaysia and Sri Lanka, shipping and security sources said on Wednesday.

Trump has not set an end date for the extended ceasefire, White House press ⁠secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters.

Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group, said prices were constrained by confidence in the crude market.

"The market continues to believe we're going to find a way through this," Flynn said.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas on Thursday said a survey of 120 oil ⁠and natural gas company executives this month found 39% expect traffic through the strait to return to normal by August and 26% expect normal traffic through the waterway by November.

Twenty percent of the executives surveyed between April 15 and 20 believe traffic will be normal by May, according to the Dallas Fed. (Reuters) https://www.shafaq.com/en/Economy/Oil-futures-rise-as-Iran-tensions-and-strikes-fuel-market-fears

Oil Spikes 17% In A Week As Iran Tensions Shake Global Supply

2026-04-24 Shafaq News Oil prices rose on Friday due to fears of a renewed military escalation in the Middle East after Iran released footage of commandos ‌boarding a cargo ship in the Strait of Hormuz and on reports Tehran's air defenses had engaged “hostile targets.”

Brent crude futures rose 99 cents, or 0.94%, to $106.06 a barrel at 0410 GMT, while West Texas Intermediate futures were up 71 cents, or 0.73%, at $96.56.

Brent rose 17.13% throughout the course of the week while WTI rose 15.13%, the second-largest weekly gain since the war began.

The resulting closure of the Strait of Hormuz after the beginning of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran cut around 20% of the world’s supply ⁠of oil and liquefied natural gas.

Both benchmark contracts settled up more than 3% on Thursday and jumped $5 a barrel after reports that air defenses were engaging targets over Tehran and of a power struggle between Iran's hardliners and moderates.

U.S. President Donald Trump said that Iran may have loaded up its weaponry "a little bit" during the two-week ceasefire, but added that the U.S. military could eliminate it in just a single day.

The ceasefire phase is increasingly looking like a preparatory phase for war, Haitong Futures said in a report. If U.S.-Iran talks fail to make key progress by the end of April and fighting resumes, oil prices could climb to new highs for the year, it added.

Iran on Thursday posted video of commandos in a speed boat storming a huge cargo ship after the collapse of peace talks, underlining its grip ‌over the ⁠Strait of Hormuz through which 20% of global oil and gas usually flows.

As investors and governments around the world look for an enduring peace, Trump said he would not set a "timetable" for ending the conflict with Iran and that he wanted to make "a great deal."

"Don't rush me," he said when asked how long he was willing to wait for a long-term peace deal with Iran.

Prolonged disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz could push global crude and ⁠refined-product inventories below five-year seasonal lows by late May or early June, adding a supply-risk premium back into oil prices, said Mingyu Gao, chief researcher for energy and chemicals at China Futures.

Trump also announced in a social media post on Thursday that Israel and Lebanon had agreed to extend their ceasefire by ⁠three weeks after a high-level meeting between representatives of both countries in the White House Oval Office.

(Reuters) https://www.shafaq.com/en/Economy/Oil-spikes-17-in-a-week-as-Iran-tensions-shake-global-supply

Gold Falls 3.5% Weekly On Higher-For-Longer Rate Fears

2026-04-24Shafaq News Gold prices fell on Friday and were on ‌track for a weekly drop, as elevated oil prices fuelled fears of inflation and higher-for-longer interest rates amid stalled U.S.-Iran peace talks.

Spot gold was down 0.7% at $4,661.33 per ounce, as of 0426 GMT. The metal is down 3.5% so far this week after a four-week winning run.

U.S. gold futures for June delivery fell 1% to $4,676.50.

Brent crude prices have risen over 17% so ⁠far this week to hover above $105 a barrel, as the key Strait of Hormuz remained largely closed despite an extension of the Iran ceasefire.

"Gold is still being trapped in this sideways range, ‌between ⁠the 50-day moving average at around $4,900 and at the bottom, the 20-day moving average at $4,645 level," Wong said, adding that "everything now boils down to what's going on in the Middle East."

Iran flaunted its tightened grip over the strait on Thursday with a video of commandos in a speedboat storming a huge cargo ship, after the collapse ⁠of peace talks that Washington had hoped would open one of the world's most important shipping corridors.

Trump told reporters that he believed Tehran wanted to make a deal but that its leadership was in turmoil. He said ⁠he was in no hurry for a deal, but if Iran did not want one, "I'll finish it up militarily."

The U.S. dollar is up 0.8% so far this week, making greenback-priced bullion more ⁠expensive for other currency holders.

The benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yields have gained over 2% this week, increasing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding bullion.

Spot silver fell 1% to $74.69 per ounce, platinum lost 1.1% to $1,984.60, while palladium was down 0.3% at $1,464.02.

(Reuters) https://www.shafaq.com/en/Economy/Gold-falls-3-5-weekly-on-higher-for-longer-rate-fears

Dollar Rises 0.6% As Iran Tensions Shake Markets

2026-04-24 Shafaq News The dollar was on track for its first weekly gain in three weeks on Friday, as stalled peace negotiations between the U.S. and Iran dampened hopes for an immediate easing of Middle ‌East tensions.

While Lebanon and Israel extended their ceasefire for three weeks ahead of its expiration on Sunday, Iran showed off its control over the Strait of Hormuz by releasing footage of its commandos storming a huge cargo ship, leaving the timing of the reopening of the world's most important shipping corridor uncertain and keeping oil prices elevated.

The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro, ticked 0.01% higher to 98.84 and remained on track for a weekly gain of 0.62%. The euro dipped 0.01% to $1.1682, while sterling edged down 0.02% to $1.3464.

"Oil and the dollar are still moving pretty closely ⁠together, and with crude creeping back up ... I'd say the dollar is still staying fairly firm," said Sho Suzuki, a market analyst at Matsui Securities.

Brent crude futures rose 45 cents, or 0.43%, to $105.52 a barrel at 0525 GMT, while West Texas Intermediate futures were up 14 cents, or 0.15%, at $95.99.

The dollar has drawn safe-haven demand amid the uncertainty. It gained ground in March as concerns over the conflict deepened, but gave back some of those gains this month as optimism over a potential resolution grew.

Meanwhile, the yen was on track for a fifth straight day of losses against the dollar, weakening 0.03% to 159.77 per dollar.

Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama reiterated her verbal warning on intervention on Friday that authorities can take "decisive" action against speculative moves in the foreign exchange market, a day after saying Japan has a "free hand" to intervene and that past interventions had been effective.

With Japanese authorities continuing to push back against yen weakness, "it is difficult to expect a scenario in which the yen weakens sharply beyond 160 per ‌dollar in ⁠the near term," said Akihiko Yokoo, senior analyst at Mitsubishi UFJ Bank, in a note.

Japan's core consumer inflation slowed below the central bank's 2% target for a second straight month in March. Analysts, though, expect inflation to accelerate back above the Bank of Japan's target in coming months, as companies begin to pass on higher fuel costs from the Middle East conflict.

The BOJ is set to hold its two-day policy meeting ending on Tuesday. Reuters reported the bank is likely to hold off raising interest rates next week as fading prospects of a near-term end ⁠to the Middle East war keep the country's economic and price outlook highly uncertain. The BOJ is still expected to signal its readiness to hike to counter mounting price pressures.

Matsui Securities' Suzuki said an intervention is more likely only if the dollar-yen pair breaks above its July 2024 high of 161.95.

"So even if yen weakness accelerates after next week's BOJ meeting, they'd probably start with ⁠jawboning and if that doesn't work, then move to actual intervention," he said.

In a similar vein, the European Central Bank will hold its deposit rate on April 30 but hike it in June, according to just over half of economists polled by Reuters, in a bid to protect a war-induced energy shock from knocking the euro zone economy ⁠off balance.

The Australian dollar weakened 0.03% versus the greenback to $0.7126. New Zealand's kiwi weakened 0.03% versus the greenback to $0.585. The dollar also held firm against emerging Asian currencies, with the Philippine peso falling 0.3% to 60.699 per dollar after touching 60.755, the lowest since late March. The Malaysian ringgit weakened 0.1% to 3.9660 and the Indian rupee slipped 0.2% to 94.2950.

In cryptocurrencies, bitcoin fell 0.23% to $77,740.57. Ethereum declined 0.73% to $2,309.52. (Reuters)

https://www.shafaq.com/en/Economy/Dollar-rises-0-6-as-Iran-tensions-shake-markets

DINARRECAPS8 4/23/26 DINARRECAPS8 4/23/26

Iraq Economic News And Points To Ponder Thursday Evening 4-23-26

Iraq Extends Parliamentary Term To Allow Government Formation

2026-04-23 Shafaq News- Baghdad Iraq’s parliament is set to extend its current legislative term, which was due to end in the coming days, until the end of next month following an agreement between the Speaker Haibet Al-Halbousi and leaders of political blocs, a lawmaker said on Thursday.

MP Ibtisam Al-Hilali of the State of Law Coalition (SLC) told Shafaq News that the extension aims to facilitate the formation of the next government following the nomination of a candidate by the Shiite Coordination Framework, the largest bloc in the 329-seat parliament, in line with Article 76 of the constitution, which requires the designated prime minister to present a cabinet within 30 days.

Iraq Extends Parliamentary Term To Allow Government Formation

Al-Hilali added that several draft laws remain under review in parliamentary committees and are expected to be addressed in upcoming sessions.

Under Iraq’s constitutional system, parliament holds two legislative terms each year, separated by recess periods, though the leadership may extend sessions or convene extraordinary meetings to address urgent political and legislative matters, particularly during government formation or when delayed laws require passage.

https://shafaq.com/en/Iraq/Iraq-extends-parliamentary-term-to-allow-government-formation

The Shiite Coordination Framework: Can Govern Iraq, But Cannot Agree On A Prime Minister

2026-04-22 / Shafaq News Four days before a constitutional deadline that could tip Iraq's government formation into legal crisis, the Shiite Coordination Framework —the largest bloc in the country's 329-seat parliament— has failed repeatedly to agree on a candidate for prime minister. The meetings were derailed by numbers that look decisive on paper and are paralyzed in practice.

The Framework holds 162 seats, nearly half of parliament, enough to claim the premiership designation under Iraq's post-2003 power-sharing system. Under that system, the prime minister is not elected by parliament but designated by whichever coalition can credibly claim the status of largest bloc, making the CF's internal selection process the real decision, and the subsequent parliamentary confidence vote its ratification.

In practice, those 162 seats are distributed across two internally competing power centers whose interests diverge sharply enough that no combination of arguments, incentives, or face-saving formulas has yet produced a majority willing to commit to a single name.

That ratification, however, is not guaranteed. A designated prime minister still requires the support of Sunni and Kurdish blocs to secure a parliamentary confidence vote. A candidate who arrives at that threshold without cross-community backing, regardless of how he was designated, cannot form a government. The internal CF contest and the broader parliamentary landscape are therefore inseparable, and the numbers across both arenas matter.

Under Article 76 of the Iraqi constitution, the Framework has until April 26 to formally present its nominee to President Nizar Amedi, who was elected by parliament on April 11. The nominee then has 30 days to form a government and secure parliamentary confidence.

Each day the Framework spends in a failed session is a day subtracted from that window, and a signal to Iraq's partners, creditors, and regional neighbors that the caretaker government of Mohammed Shia al-Sudani may be managing the country's affairs for considerably longer than anyone formally acknowledges.

The 162-Seat Fiction

The Framework declared itself the largest parliamentary bloc following the November 2025 elections and claimed the premiership designation on that basis. The declaration was procedurally correct.

What it obscured is that the 162 seats it claimed are not a unified political force, but an institutional label applied to two categories of parties whose common ground begins and ends with Shiite identity.

The first category, parties with active armed wings inside the Popular Mobilization Forces, accounts for 59 of those seats. Asaib Ahl al-Haq, the Iran-aligned paramilitary force that has since entered formal politics through its Sadiqoon movement, holds 27. The Badr Organization of Hadi al-Amiri holds 21.

Kataib Hezbollah's political wing, Hoqooq, and Kataib Imam Ali's Khadamat movement add six and five, respectively. These blocs operate under a dual logic —parliamentary presence and armed capability— that gives them leverage inside the CF disproportionate to their seat count alone.

The second category, CF members without armed wings, holds the Framework's numerical majority at 103 seats. Caretaker Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's Reconstruction and Development coalition, the election's largest single winner with 46 seats, anchors this group.

Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law coalition, which holds 29 seats and carries the Framework's formal nomination for the premiership, sits alongside Ammar al-Hakim's Al-Hikma Alliance with 18, and two smaller parties —Tasmeem and Abshir Ya Iraq— with six and four seats respectively.

The distinction between these two categories matters more than the CF's aggregate figure suggests. The “civilian majority” within the Framework is theoretically dominant. It is also the most fractured half, because civilian parties calculate in terms of governance costs, international legitimacy, and cabinet portfolios, while the armed-wing blocs calculate in terms of PMF autonomy and institutional control of the security sector. Read more: Iraq’s next Prime Minister held hostage by US-Iran standoff

The Calculus Of Deadlock

The Framework formally nominated al-Maliki on January 24 by majority vote, not by the consensus that had governed previous nomination rounds. That procedural fracture signaled from the outset that his bid lacked the internal cohesion a confidence vote would eventually require.

Four days later, US President Donald Trump publicly rejected the nomination, threatening to cut Washington's support for Baghdad if al-Maliki returned to power. The American position hardened further when US Envoy Tom Barrack visited Baghdad and conveyed the objection through diplomatic channels directly to Iraqi political leaders.

Al-Maliki did not withdraw. His camp argued that the nomination was a collective CF decision rather than a personal ambition, and that any change of course must come from within the Framework itself. That framing —institutional loyalty as a shield against external pressure — has held his position in place even as the internal balance has shifted steadily against him.

The seat count tells the story with unusual clarity. Al-Maliki's committed coalition spans three communities but remains numerically modest: his own State of Law with 29 seats, Al-Azm alliance leader Muthanna al-Samarrai's Sunni bloc with 15, and the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Masoud Barzani with 26.

The KDP welcomed his nomination publicly and concluded a reciprocal arrangement, even if not publicly, under which al-Maliki's forces would back the KDP's presidential candidate, Foreign Minister Fouad Hussein.

That arrangement collapsed on April 11 when parliament elected the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan's candidate Nizar Amedi as president, leaving the KDP without its side of the bargain and al-Maliki without his most significant non-Shiite backer.

The forces aligned against al-Maliki's personal bid command significantly greater parliamentary weight, even if they do not always agree on an alternative. Al-Sudani's Reconstruction and Development coalition holds 46 seats. The Sadiqoon movement of Qais al-Khazali and the Al-Hikma Alliance of Ammar al-Hakim, whose positions have converged around resistance to al-Maliki specifically, together contribute 45.

Mohammed al-Halbousi's Taqadum party, the largest Sunni force with 33 seats, had already rejected al-Maliki's nomination before Trump's statement, grounding its opposition in domestic political rivalry rather than American pressure.

The PUK's 15 seats, anchored by its April 11 presidential victory, sit firmly in the anti-al-Maliki camp.

Badr Organization leader Hadi al-Amiri's 21 seats remain formally neutral —the most consequential undeclared position in the entire negotiation.

The combined weight of forces either opposed to al-Maliki or uncommitted to him exceeds 160 seats across all communities. His committed base sits at roughly 70. The gap between those two figures is a structural verdict.

What has kept al-Maliki's position alive is not numbers but leverage: his ability to deny the CF the internal consensus it needs to formally displace him, and the absence of a challenger whom all opposing factions can agree to support.

That absence has produced the current impasse. The Framework scheduled a decisive meeting for last Saturday, postponed it to Monday, and watched Monday's session end without resolution. Wednesday's attempt was similarly postponed to Friday, and April 26 is now four days away. Read more: Iraq Government Formation: The Constitution that cannot enforce its own deadlines

The Mechanism Debate

Inside the failed sessions, two voting proposals have emerged as the Framework's attempt to break its own impasse, according to sources who spoke to Shafaq News.

The first would require any nominee to secure an absolute majority of CF members —a threshold of roughly 82 of 162 seats. Neither al-Maliki nor al-Sudani reaches that figure from his own bloc alone, making the outcome dependent on which man can pull Badr, Hoqooq, Khadamat, and the smaller parties into his column.

The second proposal links the selection to the parliamentary weight of blocs backing each contender, with the winning candidate required to surpass a two-thirds threshold within the Framework's leadership structure, equivalent to approximately 10 leadership votes. This shifts the contest from seat counts to institutional seniority, a terrain where al-Maliki's longer roots inside the CF machinery could offset his numerical disadvantage.

Both leaders have reportedly agreed that one of these mechanisms should govern the outcome. The agreement on process, however, masks a disagreement on proxy candidates that may prove equally difficult to resolve.

Al-Maliki's camp has advanced Bassem al-Badri, chair of the Accountability and Justice Commission, as a compromise figure. Al-Sudani's coalition has put forward Ihsan al-Awadi, director of the caretaker prime minister's office.

Thirty lawmakers from al-Sudani's own bloc have threatened to withdraw their support if al-Awadi is nominated —a signal of the factional tension running even within what should be the Framework's dominant force.

Sources within the Framework told Shafaq News that if divisions persist, discussions may shift toward a third figure with political and administrative experience capable of addressing security, economic, and governance challenges while maintaining international acceptance. Caretaker Health Minister Saleh al-Hasnawi has been floated as one such name.

The PMF's institutional status has emerged as a parallel sticking point in the cabinet portfolio negotiations. Armed-wing blocs are demanding that the PMF's designation as an independent body be preserved in any government formation agreement, a condition that directly shapes Washington's assessment of the next prime minister's willingness to constrain Iranian-aligned forces.

The External Ceiling

What the internal CF sessions have not fully absorbed is that the room where the designation is nominally being made is not the only room where it is actually being decided.

The commander of Iran's Quds Force, Esmail Qaani, completed a covert multi-day visit to Baghdad —his presence, as is customary, unannounced until after the fact. He departed, leaving his deputy behind to monitor two parallel files: the status of Iraqi armed groups in the event of an Iran-US agreement, and the government formation process itself.

The dual mandate of that deputy's presence reflects Tehran's consistent position: the PM selection and the broader regional negotiation are not separate files.

In a message issued after his departure, Qaani stated that forming a government is "a purely Iraqi right," adding that "Iraq is too great for others to interfere in its affairs" —a formulation that pointedly referenced what he described as "perpetrators of crimes against humanity," understood as a reference to the United States.

The statement publicly disavowed the very influence his presence was understood to be exercising. Most political observers in Baghdad read the visit itself as the signal, and the departing words as its diplomatic cover.

The consequences of that visit became visible shortly after. The CF was on the verge of naming al-Badri on Friday evening, with a Saturday session expected to confirm the choice. Subsequent developments —never formally identified by any party— unraveled an agreement that had appeared settled, sending the nine-candidate contest back to its starting point.

Washington's move is expected next. US Envoy Tom Barrack is anticipated to visit Baghdad imminently. The two visits —Qaani's concluded and Barrack's forthcoming— are the decisive external inputs that will shape Iraq's next political phase.

What The Numbers Cannot Resolve

The trajectory of the current negotiation points toward one of four outcomes, each carrying distinct consequences for Iraq's political architecture.

The first is an al-Maliki premiership. It remains constitutionally possible since he holds the CF's formal nomination, commands a committed cross-community coalition of roughly 70 seats, and has not withdrawn despite sustained internal and external pressure. His camp's strategy is not to win the internal CF numbers —he cannot— but to outlast the opposition's ability to coalesce around a single alternative.

Behind that strategy sits an implicit endorsement from Tehran, whose preference for al-Maliki as a known and institutionally reliable quantity has been visible throughout the formation process. However, what al-Maliki cannot overcome is the American, and the parliamentary confidence vote that follows any CF designation would require cross-community support that his current coalition cannot deliver.

His 70-seat committed base falls critically short of the majority he would need, particularly given the public distance maintained by Sunni and Kurdish blocs that have either explicitly rejected his return or quietly withheld their backing.

The second is a second term for Al-Sudani, secured through the internal CF voting mechanism once al-Maliki's bid is formally exhausted. This is the outcome the seat distribution most clearly supports.

Al-Sudani commands the largest single bloc, enjoys tacit backing from al-Hakim and al-Khazali, faces no American veto, and demonstrated through his caretaker tenure a capacity to manage the competing pressures of Washington and Tehran without forcing either into open confrontation.

He also carries the cross-community support that a confidence vote requires —the April 11 presidential session demonstrated that the coalition holds under pressure. A second Al-Sudani term would represent continuity dressed as resolution, the CF's nominal nominee displaced by its numerical reality.

The third is a compromise figure —al-Badri, al-Awadi, al-Hasnawi, or another name whose primary qualification is the absence of committed enemies. This outcome would resolve the immediate impasse while deferring its underlying causes. A prime minister without a political base of his own would govern through negotiated dependency on the blocs that installed him, meaning the CF's internal fracture would be managed rather than resolved.

External pressure shapes this scenario as directly as it does the others. Any compromise figure must clear two external thresholds simultaneously: Washington's acceptance, which rules out anyone perceived as an Iranian instrument, and Tehran's tolerance, which rules out anyone perceived as a reformist threat to PMF institutional autonomy.

The fourth, and constitutionally most precarious, outcome is a failure to meet the April 26 limit, forcing a legal and political reckoning over what happens when Iraq's largest bloc cannot exercise the designation it claims. The Federal Supreme Court's 2010 ruling on the largest bloc created the legal ground within which this contest is being fought.

Whether that architecture contains a mechanism for resolving a CF impasse that crosses the constitutional threshold is a matter Iraqi legal scholars have not been required to address until now.

A bloc that cannot agree on a candidate across multiple failed sessions is not simply experiencing political friction. It is revealing, in real time, the limits of a power-sharing system designed to distribute influence rather than concentrate it, and that has never developed a mechanism for resolving the conflicts that distribution inevitably produces.

Written and edited by Shafaq News staff.

https://shafaq.com/en/Report/The-Shiite-Coordination-Framework-Can-govern-Iraq-but-cannot-agree-on-a-prime-minister

Taboola the same on the Bottom of Posts

DINARRECAPS8 4/23/26 DINARRECAPS8 4/23/26

Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Thursday Evening 4-23-26

Good Evening Dinar Recaps,

Commodity Shift Accelerates: Energy Crisis Reshapes Currency Power

Rising geopolitical tensions and supply disruptions are driving a shift toward commodity-backed strength, altering the global currency landscape

Good Evening Dinar Recaps,

Commodity Shift Accelerates: Energy Crisis Reshapes Currency Power

Rising geopolitical tensions and supply disruptions are driving a shift toward commodity-backed strength, altering the global currency landscape

OVERVIEW (KEY POINTS)

Global markets are undergoing a significant shift as energy disruptions and geopolitical tensions reshape currency performance. Commodity-linked currencies—particularly those tied to oil and natural resources—are gaining strength while traditional currencies face increased pressure.

This is happening now due to the ongoing Middle East conflict, which has triggered one of the largest energy disruptions in recent history, forcing countries to prioritize energy security and resource access.

Key players include commodity-exporting nations like Norway, Canada, and Australia, alongside investors reallocating capital in response to changing global dynamics. These shifts are influencing currency demand and reserve strategies.

The broader implication is clear: currencies tied to real assets are gaining importance, signaling a gradual transition toward a more resource-driven global financial system.

KEY DEVELOPMENTS

1. Commodity Currencies Outperform Major Rivals

Currencies linked to natural resources are gaining strength.

Norwegian krone and Australian dollar up over 7% against the U.S. dollar in 2026
Reflects growing demand for energy and commodity-backed economies

2. Energy Crisis Drives Global Realignment

Supply disruptions are reshaping financial flows.

Middle East conflict creating historic energy market instability
Countries prioritizing secure access to oil and critical materials

3. Investment Strategies Shift Toward Resources

Capital is moving into commodity-driven markets.

Investors reducing exposure to euro and traditional currencies
Increasing allocations to commodity-linked assets and currencies

4. Dollar Holds Short-Term Strength

Despite shifts, the dollar remains dominant in crisis periods.

Rising energy prices increase demand for dollar-based transactions
Reinforces its role as a global liquidity anchor

WHY IT MATTERS

This development highlights a structural shift in global finance, where real assets like energy and commodities are increasingly influencing currency strength.

Markets are responding to supply uncertainty, creating volatility across currencies, commodities, and equities. This environment favors economies with resource control and export capacity.

For policymakers, the shift introduces new challenges. Managing inflation and growth becomes more complex when external commodity shocks drive financial conditions.

At the system level, this signals a transition toward a more fragmented and resource-dependent global financial structure.

WHY IT MATTERS TO FOREIGN CURRENCY HOLDERS

Commodity-linked currencies may strengthen relative to others
Purchasing power shifts depending on energy exposure
Capital flows favor resource-rich economies
Exchange rate volatility increases across markets

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GLOBAL RESET

Pillar 1: Resource-Backed Currency Influence

Currencies tied to tangible assets like oil and commodities are gaining importance, reinforcing a shift toward value anchored in physical resources.

Pillar 2: Fragmentation of Monetary Power

Global finance is moving toward a multi-polar currency system, where influence is distributed among resource-rich nations rather than centralized.

CONCLUSION

The rise of commodity-linked currencies reflects a deeper transformation in the global financial system. As energy disruptions continue, the importance of resource control is becoming more evident.

While the U.S. dollar remains dominant in the short term, underlying shifts suggest a gradual rebalancing of currency power driven by real-world assets.

This is not a temporary adjustment—it is part of a broader evolution shaped by geopolitics, energy, and resource security.

When commodities drive currency strength, the foundation of global finance begins to realign.

Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive

Sources

~~~~~~~~~~

Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble

Newshound's News Telegram Room Link

RV Facts with Proof Links Link

RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link

Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX

Follow Fast Facts

Seeds of Wisdom Team™Website

Thank you Dinar Recaps

Dinar Recaps 20 4/23/26 Dinar Recaps 20 4/23/26

$3.5 Trillion Private Credit Bubble will Trigger the Next Financial Crisis

$3.5 Trillion Private Credit Bubble will Trigger the Next Financial Crisis

Daniela Cambone: 4-23-2026

In a world rife with economic headlines, from inflation woes to tech stock volatility, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. But what if the biggest threat isn’t being discussed widely enough? What if a seasoned veteran, with nearly five decades of market insight, is sounding an urgent alarm about a sector you might not even be familiar with?

That’s precisely the message from Bert Dohmen, founder of Dohmen Capital and a long-time market strategist known for his contrarian views. In a recent appearance on Daniela Cambone’s show via the ITM Trading YouTube channel, Dohmen laid out a stark warning: the private credit market is a dangerous bubble, poised to trigger the next global financial crisis.

$3.5 Trillion Private Credit Bubble will Trigger the Next Financial Crisis

Daniela Cambone: 4-23-2026

Dohmen, drawing on his deep understanding of liquidity and credit cycles, argues that the rapid expansion of private credit – a sector heavily promoted by Wall Street – is showing alarming signs of stress. He points to evident liquidity shortages and recent instances of large firms halting redemptions as clear signals of serious trouble brewing beneath the surface.

Think of it this way: private credit involves direct lending by non-bank financial institutions to companies, often those that can’t access traditional bank loans or public markets. While it offers flexibility, its rapid, largely unregulated growth, coupled with widespread illiquidity, creates a precarious system. When investors want their money back, and the underlying assets can’t be quickly sold, the system grinds to a halt – a classic recipe for a financial crisis.

In this environment, he critiques popular investment trends like technology stocks and cryptocurrencies, which he believes lack intrinsic value and are highly speculative. Instead, he vehemently advocates for precious metals like gold and silver, emphasizing their historical role as safe havens and their inherent, tangible value during economic downturns.

Dohmen doesn’t shy away from critiquing conventional economic policies, especially those of the Federal Reserve. He argues that the Fed’s primary tool to combat inflation – raising interest rates – is counterproductive, actually fueling inflation by increasing business costs, which are then passed on to consumers.

He predicts ongoing inflation and economic pain, doubting that policymakers will have the fortitude to genuinely shrink the money supply due to fears of triggering a deep recession and facing severe political backlash. For investors, this means that traditional diversification strategies, often lauded in calmer times, might not offer adequate protection during the impending crisis.

Interestingly, Dohmen also notes a rising political movement in some U.S. states advocating for the reintroduction of gold and silver as currency alternatives. This reflects a growing distrust of fiat currencies and central banking policies, mirroring Dohmen’s own concerns.

Beyond finance, he stresses the critical importance of diplomacy over conflict in resolving geopolitical tensions, urging for professional diplomatic training to avoid costly and destructive wars that further destabilize the global economy.

Bert Dohmen’s message is a potent blend of caution and actionable advice. The financial system, he warns, is precarious, and the next crisis is not just impending but already showing its early signs. Understanding these risks and safeguarding your wealth with stable, intrinsically valuable assets may be your best defense against the coming storm.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr7EXRiDOo8