When Lying to Yourself Pays Off
When Lying to Yourself Pays Off
By Charlotte Cowles
The Cut’s financial advice columnist Charlotte Cowles answers readers’ personal questions about personal finance. Email your money conundrums to email@example.com
Some depressing (but unsurprising) news for optimists: We are delusional. Things generally take longer, cost more, and have a higher chance of going awry than we think they will, and there’s not much we can do about it.
We should probably know better than to cling to our unrealistic expectations, but somehow we never learn. This persistent phenomenon (known as optimism bias) afflicts about 80 percent of humans, according to Tali Sharot, a neuroscientist at University College London.
While optimism has its benefits, it’s not exactly great for financial planning. It causes people to underestimate the likelihood that they’ll experience expensive, commonplace setbacks like injury, market downturns, or a leak in the roof.
Almost all entrepreneurs test high for optimism — and most of their businesses fail. And on a larger scale, optimism bias can cost billions: A Harvard study of 33 countries found that most government agencies were overly confident in their budget planning, particularly when times were flush, resulting in large deficits.
As an optimist myself, I can personally attest that my “it’ll work out” mentality has cost me more money than I care to think about. When you add up all cab fares from when I’m running later than expected or stuff I bought because I believed it was a “good investment,” it’s a lot. I consistently spend more money than I think I will, and it’s gotten me into some tight spots.
Which is why I was surprised to read that, in a survey of over 2,000 Americans who were evaluated with the Life Orientation Test, an optimism scale developed by the University of Miami’s psychology department, 90 percent of optimists had put aside money for a major purchase compared to just 70 percent of pessimists. What’s more, nearly two-thirds of optimists had started an emergency fund, compared to less than half of pessimists.
The key, says researcher Michelle Gielan, is finding the sweet spot of “rational optimism” — a balance of expecting good things, making a realistic assessment of the present, and perhaps most importantly, believing that our behavior can improve our circumstances.
She likens it to wearing a seat belt: Not doing so might be the more optimistic choice, technically, but it would also be stupid. “Irrational optimism” is about believing your situation will somehow get better, while rational optimism is about believing that you can make your situation better.
With saving money, Gielan explains, optimists gain the upper hand simply because they think they can do it. “When people believe that their behavior matters, especially in the face of challenges, then it predicts so many success measures — their performance at work, their energy levels, their productivity, and of course their finances,” she says.
“When optimists encounter a setback, they tend to see it as a temporary and local event, only one part of their reality, and they believe that if they take steps towards creating a solution they’ll be able to get through it.”
To continue reading, please go to the original article here: