Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Monday Afternoon 11-24-25

Good Afternoon Dinar Recaps,

Ukraine’s Holos Leader Challenges Trump: Two Big Questions on His Russia Peace Plan

As Geneva talks advance, Kira Rudik says Ukraine needs clarity on how Moscow will actually commit — and whether security guarantees will be enforceable.

Overview

  • Kira Rudik, head of Ukraine’s Holos party, expresses cautious optimism over recent U.S.–Ukraine progress on Trump’s 28‑point peace proposal.

  • Still, she says Trump must answer two critical questions: 1) how will he persuade Putin to sign? 2) how will security guarantees be made real?

  • Rudik warns that past agreements failed: Ukraine trusted assurances before (Budapest Memorandum), but still endured Russian aggression.

  • She insists any future security guarantees must be ratified legally, not just be the promise of one leader.

  • Ukraine’s sovereignty remains a core concern: Rudik has previously criticized any deal requiring territorial concessions.

Key Developments

  • Rudik told Newsweek that a ceasefire, rare-earth minerals deals, and a summit between Zelensky and Putin have been floated — but “there was no step forward from Russia.” 

  • She stressed that guarantees must be executable, not just symbolic: “they need not to be the promise of one leader, but actually ratified … so that it will be a promise of the nation.” 

  • Drawing on historical precedent, Rudik referenced the Budapest Memorandum, under which Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons — but only received non-binding assurances in return. 

  • According to Al Jazeera, some European leaders strongly oppose the plan, arguing that its concessions to Russia could undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty. 

  • Key features of Trump’s 28-point proposal include: capping the size of Ukraine’s military, limiting NATO participation, and offering partial security guarantees. 

  • According to Foreign Policy, there’s confusion about the plan’s origin — some U.S. senators claim it was more “Russian wish list” than an American-authored peace framework. 

  • NBC News reports that the plan was approved at the highest levels, involving Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff, Rubio, Jared Kushner, and others. 

Why It Matters

This debate lays bare a core tension in the peace process: Ukraine’s leadership is under pressure to accept a deal while grappling with legitimacy and sovereignty risks. For Rudik and many Ukrainians, the cost of a peace deal is not just strategic — it could be existential. Without strong, enforceable guarantees, any agreement risks being another hollow promise.

Implications for the Global Reset

Pillar 4 — Security Architecture & Governance
Rudik’s demands for legally-binding guarantees underscore the larger rework of global security frameworks. If such guarantees are institutionalized (e.g., through treaties or ratified agreements), they could reshape how post-conflict security pacts are structured in a multipolar world.

Pillar 3 — Geopolitical Realignment
The pressure campaign behind Trump’s plan — combined with multiparty negotiation (U.S., Russia, Ukraine, Europe) — reflects a shift in diplomatic power. Traditional Western security structures may be evolving toward new, more unpredictable alignments.

This is not just politics — it’s global finance restructuring before our eyes.

Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive

Sources

~~~~~~~~~~

ECB Sees Stablecoin Risks as Limited in Eurozone — But Keeps a Watchful Eye

Despite fast‑growing stablecoin markets, Europe’s central bank warns that low local adoption and MiCA regulation act as buffers — for now.

Overview

  • The ECB’s latest Financial Stability Review says stablecoin-related risks in the euro area are currently limited.

  • Stablecoins are mostly used for crypto trading, not for retail payments or cross-border remittances.

  • Retail stablecoin usage is tiny, with only about 0.5% of volume in small transactions (< $250).

  • U.S.-pegged stablecoins (like USDT, USDC) dominate, but their exposure into euro‑area markets is limited.

  • MiCA regulation is cited as a key mitigant, including bans on interest payments on stablecoin holdings.

Key Developments

  • The ECB authors warn that rapid growth could spur systemic risk, especially if cross-border stablecoin issuance evades regulation.

  • Their report flags run risk: large stablecoin issuers hold significant U.S. Treasury assets, raising the possibility of “fire sales” in a liquidity crunch.

  • Cross-border regulatory arbitrage is a concern, particularly for stablecoins issued jointly by EU and non-EU entities.

  • The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) recommends stronger supervisory cooperation and stricter oversight for multi‑jurisdiction stablecoin issuers.

  • ECB President Christine Lagarde has called for firm safeguards on foreign stablecoins, warning that redemptions may favor non-EU issuers.

  • Former ECB board member Lorenzo Bini Smaghi argues Europe risks losing financial power if the euro is not better represented in stablecoins.

  • The ECB emphasizes that MiCA’s rules — including a ban on paying interest for stablecoin holdings — are critical to limiting disintermediation from banks.

Why It Matters

While stablecoin adoption remains low in Europe, the ECB’s cautious tone reveals a deeper fear: that private stablecoins (especially dollar-pegged ones) could undermine monetary sovereignty and destabilize bank funding. The regulation under MiCA is a preemptive guardrail — but rapid growth and cross-border issuance could still expose vulnerabilities if not carefully managed.

Implications for the Global Reset

Pillar 1 — Currency & Financial Fragmentation
Even if euro-denominated stablecoins are minor today, dollar-backed stablecoins could re-route capital into non-European rails. If this intensifies, it would deepen fragmentation in global finance — and challenge the euro’s role.

Pillar 4 — Financial Governance & Regulatory Architecture
The ECB’s call for global regulatory alignment (especially to curb arbitrage) highlights a broader push: to reshape how digital assets are governed. MiCA is only step one — true global coordination may define the next frontier of financial order.

This is not just politics — it’s global finance restructuring before our eyes.

Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive

Sources

~~~~~~~~~~

Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble

Newshound's News Telegram Room Link

RV Facts with Proof Links Link

RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link

Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX

Follow Fast Facts

Seeds of Wisdom Team™ Website

Thank you Dinar Recaps

Previous
Previous

The Fed Just Revealed Their Next Move

Next
Next

What Would Happen If Social Security Benefits Were Cut in Half?