Monday Iraq News Posted by Tishwash at TNT 10-12-2026
TNT:
Tishwash: The money exchange union condemns the setting of the dollar exchange rate at 155,000 dinars and threatens a general strike.
The General Syndicate of Exchange and Mediation in Iraq condemned on Sunday the video circulating and attributed to the Ministry of Interior regarding the buying and selling prices of the dollar in exchange companies, demanding that the ministry issue an official clarification regarding setting the dollar exchange rate in the parallel market at 155,000 dinars per 100 dollars, according to what was stated in the statement.
The union said in a statement seen by “ Al-Jarida ” that exchange companies of categories (A and B) do not receive cash dollars from the Central Bank of Iraq inside their premises, explaining that the delivery of dollars allocated to travelers is done through approved outlets at airports, in accordance with the applicable regulations and instructions.
She added that Class (C) exchange and brokerage companies have not received any cash dollars from the Central Bank since July 1, 2024, noting that their activity in the local market depends on buying and selling currencies according to market mechanisms, and not on obtaining dollars at the official rate from the Central Bank.
The union stressed that trading prices in the parallel market are subject to the supply and demand mechanism, questioning the possibility of obligating exchange companies to buy dollars from citizens at a price of 1545 dinars and sell them at a price of 1550 dinars per dollar, at a time when the market price, according to the statement, is 1650 dinars per dollar.
She warned that setting prices without clarifying the legal and regulatory basis could lead to market confusion and expose licensed exchange companies to pressure and complaints, calling on the Ministry of Interior to clarify the legal basis for the traded price and to differentiate between the dollar allocated for official purposes and the dollar traded in the local market outside of official mechanisms.
The union stressed its respect for the Ministry of Interior and the security services, and its appreciation for their efforts in maintaining security and enforcing the law, but it rejected, according to the statement, any measures that might affect the rights of licensed exchange companies or expose them to accountability outside the legal frameworks and instructions issued by the Central Bank and the competent authorities.
In a notable escalation, the union threatened to call for protest measures, including a general strike and a work stoppage in exchange and brokerage companies, if the pressure on companies continues without a clear legal basis, stressing that it retains its right to take the necessary judicial and administrative measures.
The union concluded its statement by emphasizing that licensed exchange companies are part of the Iraqi financial and economic system, calling for addressing imbalances in the exchange market through realistic solutions and institutional coordination, instead of holding companies responsible for price differences resulting from supply and demand conditions. link
************
Tishwash: Iraqi lawmaker challenges dollar hike in federal court
Hoqooq (Rights) parliamentary bloc leader Su’ud Al-Saadi filed a formal challenge with Iraq’s Federal Supreme Court on Sunday against the government’s decision to raise the US dollar exchange rate.
Al-Saadi told Shafaq News that the appeal targets Cabinet Resolution No. 544, which approved the exchange-rate adjustment. He said the court had accepted the filing and would set a hearing date in the coming days.
The Cabinet approved the measure on October 6 following an emergency recommendation from the finance minister and Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) governor. Under the new structure, the dollar is priced at 1,500 dinars for purchases from the Finance Ministry, 1,510 for sales to banks and 1,520 for the public.
The change raised the end-user rate by 20,000 dinars per $100 from the previous 132,000 dinars. The parallel-market rate had climbed to around 165,000 dinars per $100 ahead of the decision amid speculation over a possible devaluation.
Al-Saadi’s court challenge follows his bloc’s earlier call for Iraqis affected by the devaluation to contest the decision and for parliament to hold a special session on the rate.
On October 8, Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi told parliament that the government had faced three alternatives: compulsory savings, paying salaries every 45 days or taking on additional debt. He said public debt exceeded 208 trillion dinars (about $136.8B) and that the government needed around 10 trillion dinars (about $6.58B) each month.
Parliament Speaker Haibet Al-Halbousi said the exchange-rate decision would not be reversed and had the backing of political bloc leaders. link
*************
Tishwash: A demonstration in Karbala demands the cancellation of the decision to amend the exchange rate.
A number of residents of the holy city of Karbala organized a popular demonstration on Saturday to protest the recent decision to change the exchange rate of the dollar, stressing that the decision has direct economic and livelihood repercussions for Iraqi citizens.
The protesters called on the Council of Representatives and the province's representatives to intervene urgently to reverse the decision and restore the exchange rate to its previous level, pointing out that this change is eroding the purchasing power of their salaries and limited incomes.
For his part, Raed Al-Da'mi, a representative of the demonstrators, stressed the importance of a clear and explicit stance from the Prime Minister's office and the Council of Representatives to reconsider this decision, which he described as "unfair" to the Iraqi people, especially the poor and those with limited incomes.
In the context of parliamentary engagement, Karbala MP Ibtisam Al-Hilali announced on Saturday her "absolute solidarity with the demands of the demonstrators," confirming that the province's representatives were surprised by the hastily made decision and intend to oppose it and convey all demands to the relevant authorities.
For his part, the legal advisor to the office of the House of Representatives in Karbala, human rights lawyer Abbas Al-Qanbar, confirmed in a press statement to (Al-Mustaqilla) on Saturday that “the office is open to receive citizens’ complaints and to ensure that all demands of the demonstration are faithfully conveyed to the representatives of the governorate to take the necessary measures.” link
Tishwash: From Base to Bank: Between SWIFT and the Federal Reserve of New York... The Hidden Influence to Subjugate Post-Withdrawal Iraq
The moment the news broke about "Iraq being cut off from the SWIFT system," it seemed at first glance like a banking story concerning an electronic network used by banks to send financial transfer messages. However, behind this cold phrase lies a much larger story—the story of a country from which American forces withdrew militarily, while the United States did not withdraw to the same extent from certain key aspects of the financial system upon which the Iraqi economy is based.
Military withdrawal does not necessarily mean the end of influence. Sometimes, when soldiers leave the base, a state's influence remains in the banking system, the dollar, foreign accounts, and financial correspondent networks. This is precisely what makes the SWIFT news worthy of consideration from a perspective that transcends purely banking terminology.
However, a crucial distinction must be made: Iraq has not been completely severed from SWIFT as a state, according to available data.
What is happening is related to restrictions, sanctions, and pressures on specific Iraqi banks and their ability to access the international financial system and foreign correspondents. In fact, the Central Bank of Iraq announced last July that it had reached an agreement to reinstate seven restricted Iraqi banks to non-dollar-denominated foreign correspondent banking channels after they fulfilled compliance and governance requirements.
So why is the news about "Iraq being cut off from Swift" appearing at this time?
Here, politics becomes clearer than the news itself. Iraq ended the US military presence in September 2026, but its oil revenues are still tied to a highly sensitive external financial system. Recent reports reveal that Iraqi oil revenues, which constitute about 90% of the state budget, pass through the Central Bank of Iraq's account at the Federal Reserve in New York.
This gives Washington financial leverage even after the end of the US military mission. This means that the real question is not: Has SWIFT been closed to Iraq? Rather: To what extent can Iraq move within the global financial system without running into doors whose keys are held by the United States and its allies?
All of this represents a new form of influence. In ancient wars, a state could identify its adversary by the color of its military uniform. In modern economic warfare, however, pressure can come from a bank screen, a correspondent account, a sanctions list, or a transfer that stalls midway.
The most dangerous aspect is that sanctions need not be comprehensive to be effective. It is enough to exclude certain banks, impose dollar restrictions on them, or raise compliance requirements to a level that makes dealing with them risky for foreign banks, for the circle of influence to begin widening.
This is not a theoretical assumption. US sanctions records already include Iraqi banks subject to financial restrictions, some even bearing Iraqi SWIFT/BIC codes. This demonstrates that the issue concerns financial institutions and their access to the international system, rather than a complete isolation of Iraq from the SWIFT network.
Money is not merely a medium of exchange; it's a map revealing the relationships between them: Who transfers the funds? Where do they go? Who is the true beneficiary? Which bank does the transfer pass through? Which foreign entity accepts dealings with them? All these questions have become part of international security today, which is why controlling the flow of money can sometimes be more effective than controlling territory.
Iraq lies at the heart of this equation. It is a major oil-producing nation, and its geographic location places it at the crossroads of Iran, the Gulf states, Turkey, and the United States. Furthermore, its economic relations with the outside world depend on the dollar, correspondent banking relationships, and international financial networks.
In response, Baghdad has announced steps to reintegrate its restricted banks into the global financial system. This reveals that the struggle is not merely about punishment, but also about restructuring the Iraqi banking sector according to international compliance and governance standards. Hence, the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq becomes even more intriguing.
If the military presence has ended, the question that looms in the background is: Has influence shifted from a military base to a financial system? The reality is that economic influence did not disappear simply with the end of the military presence. This makes the current moment extremely sensitive. Sovereignty in the 21st century no longer means merely having political decisions within the state's borders; it also means that the state possesses the genuine ability to manage its finances, protect its banking system, and ensure its trade is open to the world without its economic tools becoming external instruments to be used when needed.
Therefore, today’s “SWIFT” news, even in its current form which needs scrutiny, reveals something more important than the news itself, which is that the battle over Iraq may shift from… Who owns the weapons? to… Who owns the keys to the money?, so that Iraqi sovereignty will be facing a quieter and more complex test, as the military war may end with the departure of the last soldier, but the influence of the war remains for a long time deep in the bank accounts.
In a world where sometimes the sounds of sirens go unheard, a single financial transfer being halted can have a greater impact on changing a nation's behavior than a hundred tanks on its borders. link
************
Tishwash: Perfumes priced at $3,000 versus $20: The war between original and counterfeit goods ignites the fashion market in Iraq.
Elegance in Baghdad is no longer an individual taste but a social currency with which young people negotiate for presence and confidence, between the power of the global name, the cost of the original and the temptation of the identical copy.
The obsession with brands is more about status than fleeting consumption. The market is divided between those who can afford the original and those seeking sophisticated alternatives that offer the same look but with a significant difference, without abandoning the dream of ownership.
Perfumes top the list of desired items, especially French, Italian, and luxury fashion brands. The price of an authentic perfume starts at $30 and can exceed $3,000, while a counterfeit costs between $20 and $40, leading many to choose between scent, bottle design, and brand prestige.
Brands aren't for everyday wear; they're reserved for special occasions as a symbol of confidence. A single, carefully chosen piece—a fragrance, a watch, or a handbag—is enough to complete the look and enhance your presence. Elegance is about beauty, not about flaunting wealth, and there's no need to fill your wardrobe with designer labels.
A parallel economy is forming, one that rejects any copying and demands a conformity that is difficult to detect. The motivation is not merely to show off, but to balance limited income with the desire to maintain a certain social image.
Interestingly, some wealthy individuals deliberately prefer imitation, considering it a clever use of the brand name without bearing the cost. The criterion is not quality, but rather the indistinguishability of the clothing, watches, or perfumes.
This reveals a division in the meaning of branding: one group associates it with authenticity, while another reduces it to visual impact and its ability to complete an outfit at a reasonable cost. The decision is no longer solely based on price, but also on the type of product, the occasion, and its symbolic value.
Therefore, consumers tend to spend more on perfume and watches and less on clothing. The relationship is no longer a binary choice between originality and sufficiency, but rather a middle ground for negotiation between desire and ability.
The phenomenon is not a product of communication but dates back decades, when it was concentrated among the affluent in Baghdad's markets and Rashid Street. What has changed today is the abundance of choices, the ease of knowing names, and the widespread levels of imitation, while the core interest remains constant, only the way it is expressed has changed. link