Thank you to all the subscribers to our Early Access program…we thank you for your continued support.
We are excited to offer this new service to keep you informed and up-to-date on the latest Dinar and currency news.
Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Sunday Afternoon 2-22-26
Good Afternoon Dinar Recaps,
Crypto Clarity Act Advances as Ripple and XRP Positioned for Banking Integration
Regulatory clarity could unlock full-scale digital payment infrastructure and accelerate financial system transformation
Good Afternoon Dinar Recaps,
Crypto Clarity Act Advances as Ripple and XRP Positioned for Banking Integration
Regulatory clarity could unlock full-scale digital payment infrastructure and accelerate financial system transformation
Overview
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act continues advancing through U.S. legislative channels.
Major banks have pushed back against crypto provisions, particularly around stablecoin yields.
Blockchain-based infrastructure — including Ripple’s network — is already operational globally.
Regulatory clarity could enable licensed digital asset firms to compete directly with legacy banks.
A growing policy shift in Washington may signal a structural turning point for global finance. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act — aimed at defining regulatory oversight for digital assets — is moving forward, and industry participants argue that formal clarity could accelerate blockchain integration into the core financial system.
While debate continues, one reality is clear: digital payment infrastructure already exists. What remains in motion is how quickly regulation will allow it to scale.
Key Developments
1. The Clarity Act Gains Momentum
U.S. lawmakers are working to finalize legislation that would clearly define regulatory authority between agencies overseeing digital assets. The proposed framework aims to reduce uncertainty for blockchain firms, exchanges, and payment platforms.
Industry groups have stated that defined rules would allow companies to expand confidently — offering new services and integrating more directly into mainstream finance.
2. Banks Push Back on Stablecoin Yields
According to recent reporting, traditional banking institutions have voiced concern over allowing crypto platforms to offer yield-bearing stablecoins. Banks argue such products could pull deposits away from their core funding base.
This debate highlights a broader structural tension: legacy institutions built on deposit-and-lend models versus digital networks capable of instant settlement without traditional banking hours.
3. Ripple’s Infrastructure Already Operational
Ripple Labs operates a global payment network connecting financial institutions across multiple jurisdictions. Its system is designed for real-time settlement and cross-border liquidity management.
If regulatory clarity expands operational permissions — including potential licensing frameworks — Ripple could operate not just as a technology provider but as a fully integrated financial entity within the regulated banking system.
4. XRP as a Bridge Settlement Asset
XRP functions as a bridge asset within Ripple’s payment ecosystem, facilitating fast cross-border transactions between different fiat currencies.
The underlying technology is not new. What is changing is the regulatory environment that could allow it to operate at full institutional scale.
Why It Matters
For decades, capital moved through traditional banking channels limited by geographic borders and operational hours. Blockchain systems now allow value to move instantly, continuously, and globally.
If regulatory clarity reduces compliance uncertainty, digital asset platforms could compete directly with legacy financial infrastructure — accelerating settlement speeds, lowering costs, and reshaping liquidity flows.
This represents more than crypto adoption. It signals potential modernization of core financial plumbing.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
Foreign currency holders monitoring global reset dynamics should note:
Faster cross-border settlement reduces reliance on correspondent banking networks.
Digital liquidity systems may alter reserve currency flows.
Regulatory clarity in the U.S. could strengthen dollar-linked digital assets globally.
If digital dollar infrastructure scales efficiently, it could reinforce U.S. monetary influence — even as BRICS nations pursue alternative settlement systems.
Implications for the Global Reset
Pillar 1: Infrastructure Before Policy Headlines
Digital payment rails are already built. Regulation determines activation speed.Pillar 2: Capital Follows Efficiency
Historically, capital migrates toward systems that settle faster and cost less.
This is unlikely to unfold through a single announcement. Instead, integration, licensing, and institutional positioning may gradually align — accelerating once regulatory clarity is finalized.
The shift may appear incremental at first. But when infrastructure, regulation, and capital converge, expansion can scale rapidly without rebuilding the system from scratch.
When Regulation Activates Infrastructure, Finance Accelerates.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
Reuters — “US lawmakers advance digital asset market structure bill amid banking pushback”
CoinDesk — “Banking Groups Urge Caution on Stablecoin Yield Provisions in Clarity Act Talks”
~~~~~~~~~~
Japan’s Takaichi Signals Fiscal Pivot to Reignite Growth
Tokyo shifts from austerity toward strategic investment, testing market confidence amid record debt levels
Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has pledged to move away from what she described as “excessive fiscal austerity”, outlining a more proactive government spending strategy designed to revive economic growth while maintaining fiscal discipline.
Speaking before parliament, Takaichi emphasized long-term investment, structural reform, and multi-year budgeting as central pillars of her administration’s economic reset. The announcement comes at a sensitive moment for global markets already monitoring Japan’s elevated public debt and bond volatility.
Overview
Japan plans to shift toward pro-growth fiscal expansion.
Priority sectors include AI, semiconductors, and shipbuilding.
A temporary food consumption tax suspension is under consideration.
Markets remain cautious due to Japan’s high debt-to-GDP ratio.
Japan remains the world’s fourth-largest economy, but decades of low growth, demographic pressure, and deflationary cycles have weighed on expansion. Takaichi’s approach represents a strategic pivot aimed at reversing that trajectory.
Key Developments
1. Pivot to Pro-Growth Fiscal Policy
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi reaffirmed her commitment to what she calls “responsible, proactive fiscal policy.” The government plans to deploy targeted public investment to stimulate private-sector expansion, particularly in high-productivity industries. Priority sectors include:
Additionally, the administration is proposing a two-year suspension of the consumption tax on food to ease household cost pressures and stimulate domestic demand. The underlying thesis is clear: Japan’s growth problem stems from underinvestment, not overspending.
2. Multi-Year Budget Reform Framework
A structural shift in fiscal architecture accompanies the spending plan. Japan traditionally operates on single-year budgets, but Takaichi proposes introducing multi-year investment frameworks to improve continuity and long-term planning.
The new structure would separate:
Artificial intelligence infrastructure
Advanced semiconductor manufacturing
Strategic industrial capacity such as shipbuilding
This reform aims to provide predictability for capital-intensive projects and reduce policy disruption from annual political cycles. If implemented, it could mark one of the most significant fiscal governance reforms in decades.
3. Fiscal Safeguards to Address Market Concerns
Japan maintains the highest public debt burden among advanced economies, and earlier signals of fiscal expansion contributed to bond market pressure and yen weakness.
To reassure investors, Takaichi outlined fiscal guardrails, including:
Ensuring debt growth does not exceed GDP growth
Offsetting new spending through subsidy reductions
Introducing measurable fiscal performance indicators
Gradually lowering the debt-to-GDP ratio
The administration is attempting a delicate balance between growth activism and market credibility, recognizing that fiscal expansion without discipline could destabilize bond markets and currency confidence.
Why It Matters
Japan is attempting a controlled fiscal expansion at a time when many advanced economies are tightening. If successful, the policy could re-anchor growth and productivity in Asia’s largest developed economy.
If mismanaged, it risks destabilizing bond markets and reigniting currency volatility.
Japan’s fiscal shift signals that growth — not austerity — may define the next global policy cycle.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
Japan’s move could influence:
Yen stability and capital flows
Asian supply-chain investment dynamics
Global bond market risk pricing
A credible pro-growth model could strengthen the yen long-term. Conversely, debt fears could pressure currency markets and alter global reserve allocations.
When major economies recalibrate fiscal doctrine, global liquidity patterns adjust.
Implications for the Global Reset
Pillar 1: Strategic Industrial Investment
Major economies are increasingly prioritizing domestic industrial capacity — particularly in semiconductors and AI — signaling a broader shift toward economic sovereignty.Pillar 2: Debt Sustainability vs. Growth Activism
Japan’s approach tests whether high-debt economies can expand strategically without triggering market instability.
The broader global reset narrative increasingly centers on this balance: Can sovereign debt-heavy nations engineer productivity-driven growth without financial disruption?
Japan may now serve as a live case study.
Multi-Year Budget Reform Signals Structural Economic Reset
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
Reuters — “Japan PM Takaichi vows proactive fiscal policy while safeguarding market confidence”
Modern Diplomacy — “Japan’s Takaichi Pledges Spending Shift to Revive Growth”
~~~~~~~~~~
Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble
Newshound's News Telegram Room Link
RV Facts with Proof Links Link
RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link
Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX
Follow Fast Facts
Seeds of Wisdom Team™ Website
Thank you Dinar Recaps
Iraq Economic News and Points To Ponder Sunday Afternoon 2-22-26
Al-Maliki Pledges Global Partnerships Under Iraqi Sovereignty
2026-02-22 / 10:15 Shafaq News- Baghdad State of Law Coalition leader Nouri Al-Maliki affirmed on Sunday Iraq’s openness to solid international partnerships with the United States and Europe, noting that “Baghdad’s hand is extended” for regional and global cooperation.
Al-Maliki Pledges Global Partnerships Under Iraqi Sovereignty
2026-02-22 / 10:15 Shafaq News- Baghdad State of Law Coalition leader Nouri Al-Maliki affirmed on Sunday Iraq’s openness to solid international partnerships with the United States and Europe, noting that “Baghdad’s hand is extended” for regional and global cooperation.
In a post on X, Al-Maliki framed this stance as a national duty, stressing the importance of strengthening Iraq’s political process and investing in the country’s infrastructure, education, energy, and public services. He also insisted that Iraq’s identity is “purely Iraqi,” noting that decisions are made in the best interest of its people.
X Nouri Al-Maliki @nourialmalikiiq
Our national responsibility towards our people and our homeland #Iraq compels us to strive and dedicate our expertise to correcting and strengthening the course of the political process.
We believe in a democratic, civil Iraq that is open to solid international partnerships such as the United States and Europe, where economic relations with them will bring about a revolution in expanding and deepening infrastructure, education, service development, and energy.
We affirm that our identity is purely Iraqi, based on the will of our Iraqi people, and that our decision stems first and foremost from the interest of our people.
And our hand is extended for regional and international cooperation and integration for the benefit of the peoples of the countries of the region and the world.
The remarks come amid a split within the Shiite Coordination Framework (CF), Iraq’s largest parliamentary bloc, over whether Al-Maliki should remain its candidate for the country’s next premier.
Earlier today, several sources informed Shafaq News that Al-Maliki insisted any decision to withdraw his nomination for prime minister must be made by a majority vote within the CF, framing voluntary withdrawal as “yielding to US pressure.” According to the sources, some figures within the CF are using intermediaries to encourage a withdrawal without public attribution, while others are mobilizing support to secure enough backing for a majority vote at a meeting expected within hours, ahead of a US-linked deadline. Nouri Al-Maliki’s new doctrine for power: Pragmatism over defiance?
The United States has openly opposed Al-Maliki’s potential return to office. A US State Department spokesperson indicated to Shafaq News that President Donald Trump’s position remains unchanged, cautioning that selecting Al-Maliki would prompt Washington to reassess its relationship with Iraq. The spokesperson cited concerns about the influence of Iran-backed armed factions in Iraqi politics and the need to strengthen economic partnerships aligned with US objectives.
Al-Maliki, who led the government for eight years between 2006 and 2014, has reaffirmed his commitment to his candidacy, noting that any reversal must come through a formal decision by the CF.
Read more: Nouri Al-Maliki’s return rekindles Iraq’s divisions as Iran and the US pull apart
https://www.shafaq.com/en/Iraq/Al-Maliki-pledges-global-partnerships-under-Iraqi-sovereignty
SLC, PUK Review Iraq Government Formation Amid Presidential Deadlock
2026-02-22 Shafaq News- Baghdad State of Law Coalition (SLC) leader Nouri Al-Maliki and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) President Bafel Talabani discussed on Sunday Iraq’s political impasse and efforts to form a new government.
A statement from Al-Maliki’s office indicated that discussions addressed recent political and security developments and the need for coordination among key forces to preserve stability and reinforce state institutions. Both sides stressed resolving the presidency within constitutional mechanisms and affirmed that the premiership should go to the nominee of the Shiite Coordination Framework (CF), the largest bloc in parliament.
deSpsotorn6l28u23c36ffc61c320f7th10fht0g10uf35a94fc14gc5967a ·
The head of the State of Law Coalition, Mr. Nouri Al-Malki, receives the head of the Kurdistan National Party
The head of the State of Law Coalition, Mr. Nouri Al-Malki, was received at his office today, the head of the National Kurdistan Union Party, Mr. Pavel Talibani, and his accompanying delegation.
During the meeting, a research was conducted on the developments of the political and security situations in the country, and emphasized the importance of promoting cooperation and coordination among national forces in order to consolidate stability and support the path of the state and its constitutional institutions.
The two sides addressed the constitutional merit file, where it was emphasized the necessity of adherence to it and respecting the legal frameworks in deciding the presidential candidate and commitment to the assignment of the Atar candidate for the presidency of ministers, thereby strengthening the principle of national partnership and maintaining the democratic path.
The parties also stressed the importance of continuing constructive dialogue between different political forces, working with the spirit of national responsibility to overcome existing challenges, and achieving the aspirations of the Iraqi people in security, stability and development. The media office of Mr. Nouri Alalki 22 / February / 2026
Under Iraq’s power-sharing arrangement, the presidency is allocated to a Kurd, the premiership to a Shiite, and the speakership to a Sunni Arab. Attempts to elect a president have repeatedly failed due to divisions between the two main Kurdish parties, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the PUK, preventing quorum.
Read more: Iraq slips into constitutional vacuum as presidential deadlock drags on
Parliament Speaker Haibet Al-Halbousi has requested a Federal Supreme Court interpretation of Article 72 (Second/B), which sets a 30-day deadline from parliament’s first session to elect a president. The deadline expired on January 28, and although sessions continue, a vote has not been scheduled due to low attendance.
A two-thirds quorum is required to elect a president, who then tasks the largest bloc with forming a cabinet. The CF remains split over Al-Maliki’s candidacy, with the head of the Al-Hikma Movement, Ammar Al-Hakim, and Asaib Ahl Al-Haq leader Qais Al-Khazali expressing reservations. International reactions, including warnings from the United States over the potential implications of his selection, have also raised concerns among some Sunni factions.
Read more: Iraq’s next Prime Minister held hostage by US-Iran standoff
https://www.shafaq.com/en/Iraq/SLC-PUK-review-Iraq-government-formation-amid-presidential-deadlock
Iraqi Capital Stands As Second-Most Populous Arab City
2026-02-22 Shafaq News- Baghdad Baghdad ranked as the second-largest Arab city by population in 2026, with over 8 million residents, according to new estimates released by World Population Review.
The report places the Iraqi capital’s population at 8,370,410, reflecting an increase of 229,290 people over the past year —an annual growth rate of 2.82%. By comparison, Baghdad had 579,167 residents in 1950.
Cairo topped the list with 23.5 million residents, while Riyadh ranked third with 8.0 million. Khartoum and Alexandria recorded 6.9 million and 5.9 million, respectively, followed by Jeddah with 5.1 million and Casablanca with 4.0 million. Sanaa was listed with 3.6 million residents, Kuwait City with 3.4 million, and Dubai rounded out the top ten with 3.1 million.
Read more: Census shock: Can Iraq’s system absorb its population explosion?
https://www.shafaq.com/en/society/Iraqi-capital-stands-as-second-most-populous-Arab-city
EIA: Iraq’s Oil Exports To US Rank Third Over Week
2026-02-22 Shafaq News- Baghdad/ Washington Iraq’s crude oil exports to the United States rose to 371,000 barrels per day (bpd) last week, ranking third among the largest suppliers, US Energy Information Administration (EIA) data showed on Sunday.
According to the data, Iraqi shipments were up 122,000 bpd from 249,000 bpd a week earlier.
Total US crude imports from ten major suppliers increased to 6.0 million bpd, up 122,000 bpd from 5.878 million bpd the previous week. Canada remained the top supplier at 3.877 million bpd, followed by Saudi Arabia with 707,000 bpd, Iraq with 371,000 bpd, Mexico with 325,000 bpd, and Colombia with 221,000 bpd.
Additional imports came from Brazil at 208,000 bpd, Libya at 191,000 bpd, Ecuador at 50,000 bpd, Venezuela at 49,000 bpd, and Nigeria at 1,000 bpd. https://www.shafaq.com/en/Economy/EIA-Iraq-s-oil-exports-to-US-rank-third-over-week
“Tidbits From TNT” Sunday 2-22-2026
TNT:
Tishwash: Cooperation conditions and potential sanctions: Baghdad returns to Washington's priorities
The United States has strongly entered the political crisis in Iraq, after explicitly linking the future of bilateral cooperation to the arms issue and the formation of the next government, in a move that indicates Washington's shift to a position of direct influence in shaping the power equation, according to the "Eram News " website.
The website stated in a report seen by Al-Sa’a Network, quoting its sources, that “what is happening in Iraq cannot be described as passing pressure or a traditional diplomatic stance, but rather it is part of an American decision to rearrange the political landscape after years of managing the crisis remotely .”
TNT:
Tishwash: Cooperation conditions and potential sanctions: Baghdad returns to Washington's priorities
The United States has strongly entered the political crisis in Iraq, after explicitly linking the future of bilateral cooperation to the arms issue and the formation of the next government, in a move that indicates Washington's shift to a position of direct influence in shaping the power equation, according to the "Eram News " website.
The website stated in a report seen by Al-Sa’a Network, quoting its sources, that “what is happening in Iraq cannot be described as passing pressure or a traditional diplomatic stance, but rather it is part of an American decision to rearrange the political landscape after years of managing the crisis remotely .”
He added that "the United States, which established the political system after 2003 and sponsored its basic paths, sees today that the equation of internal balance has been disrupted in favor of a specific regional influence, so it is trying to reset the rules of the game, whether through financial tools or by linking the form of the next government to determinants related to sovereignty and weapons ."
He pointed out that "the Iraqi file has returned to the White House's priorities in light of regional tensions, US-Iranian negotiations, and the fear that Iraq will become a complete base for one axis, which Washington does not consider a strategically acceptable option ."
The report indicated that "the renewed American interest in Iraq is inseparable from a broader equation related to managing Iranian influence in the region, but Washington realizes that any direct confrontational approach could threaten internal stability ."
He pointed out that "the US administration is trying to achieve a delicate balance; it is not seeking to ignite the situation in Iraq, but it wants a government capable of controlling weapons outside the framework of the state and reducing the influence of factions on sovereign decision-making, because the continuation of this reality weakens the strategic partnership and complicates the energy, investment and security files ."
He explained that "the pressure will not be military, but will take the form of political messages and perhaps financial measures or specific sanctions, while keeping the door open for understanding with any government that provides practical assurances regarding the restriction of weapons and regulating the relationship with Iran ."
Despite the clear American influence in shaping the equations of governance in Iraq during the past years, the last few months have witnessed a broader and more diverse involvement, not limited to the issue of weapons or the formation of the government, but extending to sensitive economic and financial files, including mechanisms for dollar transfers, regulating the banking sector, and controlling the movement of funds related to foreign trade link
************
Tishwash: Among them is "withdrawing his candidacy"... The options for the coordination framework regarding Maliki have been revealed
Informed sources confirmed on Saturday that the forces of the Coordination Framework are planning to hold an expanded meeting to end the political deadlock by deciding on Nouri al-Maliki’s nomination for the premiership, either by keeping him or replacing him.
Sources told Shafaq News Agency that "the coordination framework, which brings together the Shiite political forces, is moving towards holding a meeting to end the political deadlock and agree on a unified position regarding the prime minister candidate."
He adds that "the current approach is to choose a figure who suits the circumstances surrounding the country and the economic and security challenges, provided that a date is set for the parliament session to elect the president of the republic, who in turn will task the framework candidate with forming the government."
He pointed out that "the meeting will address the issue of the continued nomination of the head of the State of Law Coalition, Nouri al-Maliki, or his personal withdrawal, or the framework will decide to officially withdraw his nomination and look for an alternative."
The “coordination framework,” which includes ruling Shiite political forces in Iraq, is witnessing a division over the nomination of Maliki for the next government, amid American warnings of the repercussions of his selection, which prompted forces within the coalition to try to persuade him to withdraw in order to preserve the unity of the framework.
In contrast, Maliki has declared on more than one occasion his adherence to his candidacy and believes that withdrawing from it should be done by an official decision from the framework.
The escalating American pressure on Iraq comes as a translation of President Donald Trump’s explicit threats, which included criticism of the previous course taken by Maliki when he assumed the premiership for 8 years.
On January 24, 2026, the Coordination Framework announced the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki, head of the State of Law Coalition, for the position of Prime Minister, with a majority vote from its constituent groups. link
************
Tishwash: Why is Iraq betting on US Treasury bonds despite the erosion of global confidence?
$40.8 billion at the heart of the storm
At a time when global markets are witnessing escalating debate about the future of US Treasury bonds and the dollar's role in the international financial system, Baghdad increased its holdings of these bonds to approximately $40.8 billion by the end of December 2025, an increase of $1.1 billion in a single month, representing a growth rate of 74% compared to January of the same year.
According to data from the US Treasury Department, "Iraq's holdings of US Treasury bonds for December 2025 increased by $1.1 billion, reaching $40.8 billion, up from $39.7 billion in the preceding month." The data also showed that these holdings increased by 74% compared to January 2025, when they stood at $23.4 billion.
Treasury bonds: Between historical confidence and modern turmoil
For decades, US Treasury bonds have been considered the cornerstone of the global financial system, the safe haven for investors in times of crisis, the gold standard for sovereign debt, and the foundation of the global capital market – a status rooted in the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944.
However, the period between 2024 and 2025 witnessed a decline in unconditional confidence in this financial instrument, with yields on 10-year US Treasury bonds rising to more than 5.2%, their highest levels since 2007, amid an annual budget deficit exceeding $1.8 trillion, debt service costs exceeding $514 billion annually, along with growing US political division and a decline in some investors' confidence in the long-term ability to manage the debt.
In this context, Mazhar Muhammad Salih, the Prime Minister's Advisor for Economic and Financial Affairs, stated that "Iraq's foreign exchange reserves portfolio, denominated in US dollars and other foreign currencies, constitutes a specialized national sovereign wealth fund directly linked to monetary policy objectives aimed at maintaining the stability of the monetary system and preserving the external value of the Iraqi dinar, particularly exchange rate stability."
Speaking to Al-Mada, Salih explained that "Iraq's increased holdings of US Treasury bonds are structurally linked to its location within the 'dollar zone,' given that the primary source of foreign currency is oil revenues (petrodollars). Therefore, allocating a portion of the dollar reserves to US sovereign debt instruments is a natural practice consistent with international reserve management principles."
He explained that “diversifying the dollar portfolio through investment in US Treasury bonds represents a low-risk option, given their high liquidity, high sovereign credit rating, and the strength of the US economy.” He pointed out that “Iraq’s direct and indirect ties to global financial markets, particularly the US market, make this investment part of a strategy for managing reserves efficiently and safely.”
He added that public data indicates that “approximately 30% of US Treasury bonds traded in the markets are owned by foreign entities, compared to about 70% owned by institutions and investors within the United States, such as the Federal Reserve, pension funds, banks, and domestic investors.”
According to data from the US Treasury Department as of the end of 2025, the largest holders of US Treasury bonds are Japan with approximately $1.2 trillion, followed by the United Kingdom with approximately $888.5 billion, then the People's Republic of China with approximately $682.6 billion, and Luxembourg with approximately $423 billion, in addition to other countries.
Saleh emphasized that "investing Iraq's official reserves in US Treasury bonds falls under the prudent management of sovereign dollar wealth and is part of a stable and balanced foreign monetary policy whose primary goal is to enhance confidence in the national economy and protect the country's financial stability."
For his part, economist Haider al-Kafishi believes that "investing approximately $30 billion in US Treasury bonds is a safe option with financial benefits, but it could expose the country to political pressure."
Al-Kafishi told Al-Mada that “Iraq is resorting to this type of investment due to the high level of spending on reconstruction, as well as its efforts to diversify its foreign reserves and avoid potential political and social upheavals.” He explained that “Iraq has divided its investments between long-term investments, estimated at around $28 billion, and short-term investments, amounting to $12 billion.”
He pointed out that “short-term investments contribute to generating financial returns and supporting the stability of the dinar's exchange rate, in addition to the ease of converting them into cash when needed.”
He noted that “there are paradoxes in investing in US Treasury bonds for a country like Iraq, especially since their interest rates are subject to the policies of the US Federal Reserve, which may affect returns and cast a shadow on investors.”
He indicated that “Iraq may be exposed to political pressure as a result of this type of investment,” pointing out that “the sum of $40 or $41 billion, despite its importance, is not considered large compared to the size of the US economy, at a time when the government is striving to attract foreign investors to invest within the country.”
He concluded by saying that “there are investment opportunities within Iraq that can generate higher financial returns than those offered by US Treasury bonds, which are considered low-yielding compared to some local sectors.”
The 2024-2025 crisis reveals deeper shifts in the structure of the global financial system, where US Treasury bonds are no longer immune to geopolitical and financial fluctuations. With some major central banks moving to reduce their holdings, a serious debate has emerged about the future of the dollar as the dominant reserve currency.
Nevertheless, from a monetary policy perspective, Iraqi investment in US bonds remains part of a defensive strategy aimed at protecting reserves and ensuring exchange rate stability, rather than a pursuit of high returns. link
************
Mot: . Actual Classified Ads You Won’t Believe Were Real:
Actual Classified Ads You Won’t Believe Were Real:
FREE YORKSHIRE TERRIER
8 years old. Hateful little gremlin. Bites everything in sight!
FREE PUPPIES
Half Cocker Spaniel, half sneaky neighbor’s dog. (DNA test not included.)
FREE PUPPIES
Mom’s a registered German Shepherd.
Dad? A mystery superhero dog — last seen leaping tall fences in a single bound.
COWS & CALVES — NEVER BRED
Also featuring: One exceptionally friendly, openly gay bull.
JOINING A NUDIST COLONY!
Must sell washer and dryer. £100, or best offer. Clothes no longer needed!
WEDDING DRESS FOR SALE
Worn once, by mistake.
Call Stephanie for the full tragic love story.
FOR SALE: Encyclopaedia Britannica — 45 Volumes
Excellent condition. £200 or best offer.
No longer needed — got married. My wife knows everything.
Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Sunday Morning 2-22-26
Good Morning Dinar Recaps,
U.S. Escalates Global Tariffs After Supreme Court Setback — A Shock to the Global Reset
Trade policy throws a curveball into the international economic order as new tariffs spread uncertainty
Good Morning Dinar Recaps,
U.S. Escalates Global Tariffs After Supreme Court Setback — A Shock to the Global Reset
Trade policy throws a curveball into the international economic order as new tariffs spread uncertainty
Overview
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down key elements of President Trump’s sweeping tariff regime, creating immediate global market reactions and legal disruption.
In response, Trump announced and signed a new 10% global tariff on imports from all countries, using alternative trade law authority.
Stocks jumped in global markets as investors digested the ruling and policy pivot.
The unexpected policy shifts threaten to reshape trade relationships, reserve positioning, and currency dynamics — all critical to the unfolding Global Financial Reset narrative.
Key Developments
1. Supreme Court Ruling Overturns Major Tariffs
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump overstepped his authority by using emergency economic powers to impose broad tariffs on trading partners. The decision limits executive power and reasserts that Congress must explicitly authorize tariff imposition under the Constitution.
2. Trump Retaliates With Temporary 10% Tariff
Rather than retreating, Trump quickly pivoted by imposing a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. This alternative legal route allows temporary tariffs for up to 150 days without congressional approval, injecting new trade friction into global markets.
3. Market Reaction Reflects Policy Shock
Global stock markets, including major U.S. and European indices, rallied in the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling as investors perceived reduced risk of prolonged tariff escalation. The dollar weakened slightly, while Treasury yields rose modestly.
4. Ongoing Uncertainty and Legal Complexity
Although the global tariff is now in place, the long-term legal and political framework remains unsettled. Businesses, trading partners, and legal experts await clarity on refunds for invalidated tariffs and on how the new measures will intersect with existing duties under other statutes.
Why It Matters
Unilateral tariff shocks disrupt global trade architecture and introduce structural uncertainties that ripple through supply chains, capital flows, and reserve strategies. When the world’s largest economy flexes trade policy in unpredictable ways, it increases fragmentation risk — a key variable in how the Global Financial Reset unfolds.
Fiscal unilateralism now shapes currency expectations and system stability.
Protectionism at scale accelerates financial realignments — structural shifts follow policy shocks.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
For foreign currency holders focused on the Global Reset:
Trade disruptions tend to strengthen safe-haven currencies and promote reserve diversification away from assets tied to unstable trade regimes.
Elevated tariff risk feeds into inflation expectations, central bank policy responses, and potential capital reallocations.
Persistently unpredictable U.S. trade policy may accelerate movements toward multipolar reserve assets, including the euro, yuan, and gold — as investors reassess long-term currency risk.
Geopolitics now plays out as monetary pressure.
When trade barriers rise, currency realignment accelerates underneath.
Implications for the Global Reset
Pillar 1: Trade Fragmentation Accelerates Monetary Diversification
Fragmented trade policies can push nations to reduce systemic reliance on the dollar, creating space for alternative reserve arrangements and payment systems.Pillar 2: Risk Appetite and Capital Allocation Shift
Tariff shock waves drive portfolio rebalancing toward assets and currencies perceived as less vulnerable to unilateral policy swings, potentially reshaping reserve compositions.
The shock to open markets may well fuel the next chapter of global currency evolution.
This is not just trade policy — it’s global finance recalibrating under stress.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
~~~~~~~~~~
BRICS Pulls Silver Out of COMEX, JP Morgan Left Scrambling
Physical silver drain intensifies as East-West price gap widens and delivery pressure builds
Overview
Massive silver withdrawals are straining COMEX registered inventories.
A sustained East-West price spread is pulling metal toward Shanghai markets.
Institutional players — including JPMorgan Chase — are increasing physical positioning.
Analysts project dramatically higher silver prices through 2026 amid supply stress.
The global silver market is showing signs of structural fracture as BRICS-linked demand accelerates physical withdrawals from Western exchanges. With registered inventories tightening and futures exposure far exceeding deliverable supply, market participants are watching closely for signs of repricing pressure that could ripple through global commodities and currency markets.
Key Developments
1. COMEX Inventory Drawdowns Intensify
During the first week of January 2026, COMEX warehouses reportedly saw a 33.45-million-ounce withdrawal — roughly 26% of registered inventory in a single week. Meanwhile, the March 2026 futures contract carries more than four times the registered silver available for delivery, amplifying stress on paper-to-physical ratios.
Analysts warn that if even a modest percentage of contract holders stand for delivery, registered inventories could tighten dramatically.
2. Shanghai Premium Signals East-West Dislocation
The price of silver in Shanghai has maintained a sustained premium — reportedly between $5 and $10 per ounce — over Western benchmarks. This persistent spread incentivizes physical metal movement eastward, particularly toward BRICS-aligned markets where industrial and investment demand remains firm.
The premium structure reflects stronger physical demand relative to futures-driven price discovery in Western exchanges.
3. JPMorgan’s Strategic Positioning
Activity from JPMorgan Chase has drawn attention as delivery posture and vault movements suggest strategic accumulation. Market observers note that major institutions appear to be increasing exposure to physical silver amid widening arbitrage opportunities.
Such positioning signals anticipation of a possible repricing event if paper markets lose control over supply dynamics.
4. 2026 Silver Price Forecasts Turn Aggressive
Some projections now place average silver prices near $81 per ounce in 2026 — more than double 2025 averages. Whether those forecasts materialize depends largely on delivery behavior, sustained BRICS demand, and the durability of the COMEX pricing structure under stress.
Why It Matters
Silver sits at the crossroads of industrial demand, monetary hedging, and geopolitical reserve diversification. When physical inventories tighten while futures leverage expands, the risk of price dislocation increases.
The widening East-West price gap suggests that price discovery may be shifting away from traditional Western exchanges — a subtle but powerful signal in the broader Global Financial Reset narrative.
Silver’s Eastward Shift Signals a Commodity Power Pivot.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
For foreign currency holders watching the Global Reset landscape:
Accelerated physical accumulation supports the case for commodity-backed asset strategies.
Precious metals repricing can pressure fiat currencies tied to leveraged paper markets.
BRICS-aligned demand strengthens the argument for multipolar reserve diversification.
If silver undergoes a structural repricing, it could influence not only commodity markets but also currency confidence frameworks — particularly in economies heavily dependent on derivatives-based price discovery systems.
When Physical Demand Drains Paper Markets, Repricing Follows.
Implications for the Global Reset
Pillar 1: Physical Assets Gain Strategic Importance
A sustained drain from COMEX would reinforce the importance of tangible asset backing in a fragmented global monetary system.Pillar 2: Price Discovery Shifts Eastward
If Shanghai and BRICS-linked exchanges increasingly influence pricing, Western financial dominance in metals markets could gradually weaken.
The silver market may be offering an early signal of how financial power transitions unfold — quietly at first, then suddenly.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
Watcher.Guru — “BRICS Pulls Silver Out of COMEX, JP Morgan Left Scrambling”
Reuters — “Precious metals outlook: supply pressures and China demand reshape silver market”
~~~~~~~~~~
🌱 A Message to Our Currency Holders🌱
If you’ve been holding foreign currency for many years, you were not foolish.
You were not wrong to believe the global financial system would change.
What failed was not your patience — it was the information you were given.
For years, dates, rumors, and personalities replaced facts, structure, and proof. “This week” predictions created cycles of hope and disappointment that were never based on how currencies actually change.
That is not your failure.
Our mission here is different: • No dates • No rates • No hype • No gurus
Instead, we focus on:
• Verifiable developments • Institutional evidence
• Global financial structure • Where countries actually sit in the process
Currency value changes only come after sovereignty, trade, banking, settlement systems, and fiscal coordination are in place. History and institutions confirm this sequence.
You will see silence. You will see denials. That is not delay — that is discipline.
Protect your identity. Organize your documents. Verify everything.
Never hand your discernment to anyone who cannot show proof.
You deserve truth — not timelines.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News
~~~~~~~~~~
Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble
Newshound's News Telegram Room Link
RV Facts with Proof Links Link
RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link
Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX
Follow Fast Facts
Seeds of Wisdom Team™ Website
Thank you Dinar Recaps
Iraq Economic News and Points To Ponder Sunday Morning 2-22-26
State And Security Employees' Salaries For February Have Been Disbursed
Money and Business Economy News – Baghdad The Iraqi Ministry of Finance announced on Sunday the release of funds for the salaries of state employees and members of the security forces for the month of February, confirming that it has begun sending the financial allocations to the relevant authorities in preparation for their distribution through approved banks.
The ministry stated in a statement received by "Al-Eqtisad News" that the disbursement procedures came after the completion of the administrative and technical requirements, to ensure the smooth transfer of salaries to the accounts of employees in various governorates.
State And Security Employees' Salaries For February Have Been Disbursed
Money and Business Economy News – Baghdad The Iraqi Ministry of Finance announced on Sunday the release of funds for the salaries of state employees and members of the security forces for the month of February, confirming that it has begun sending the financial allocations to the relevant authorities in preparation for their distribution through approved banks.
The ministry stated in a statement received by "Al-Eqtisad News" that the disbursement procedures came after the completion of the administrative and technical requirements, to ensure the smooth transfer of salaries to the accounts of employees in various governorates.
She added that departments and institutions are expected to begin disbursing salaries gradually over the next few hours, according to the mechanisms of each banking entity. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65941
Environment: Iraq Is Internationally Committed To Removing Landmines By The End Of 2028
Money and Business Economy News – Baghdad The Ministry of Environment confirmed on Sunday that Iraq is internationally committed to removing mines and war remnants by the end of 2028, while noting the need to pay attention to the mines issue.
The ministry's administrative undersecretary, Iktifa al-Hasnawi, said that "Iraq is internationally committed to declaring the country free of mines and war remnants by the end of 2028," noting that "this commitment faces challenges in the absence of financial allocations."
She pointed out that "the issue of mines and war remnants depends mainly on national efforts and some investment projects that are coordinated with authorized companies."
Al-Hasnawi explained that "the United States has stopped its international support for the mine removal program," stressing the need for "the next government to give special and real attention to the mine issue through financial allocations and logistical support for the national effort, as well as the governors' interest in supporting and clearing their governorates." https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65946
Indonesian President After Canceling Trump's Tariffs: We Are Ready To Face All Eventualities
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto said on Saturday that the government is prepared for all eventualities after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump's global tariffs.
Prabowo led a government delegation to Washington last week to attend the inaugural meeting of Trump’s Peace Council and to hold a bilateral meeting with the US president to sign a trade agreement that would reduce tariffs on Indonesian exports from 32% to 19%.
"We are prepared for all eventualities," Prabowo told reporters in a video statement. "We respect the internal politics of the United States, and we will monitor developments."
On the other hand, Indonesia’s chief negotiator on US tariffs, Airlangga Hartarto, said the government has asked the United States to maintain previously agreed tariff exemptions for a number of Indonesian exports, such as palm oil, coffee and cocoa.
Airlangga added that the trade agreement signed on Friday between Indonesia and the United States remains in effect despite the latest developments, saying that there is different treatment for countries that have signed a trade agreement with Washington. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65932
Japan Hosts The First Meeting Of Trump's National Energy Dominance Council
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up The U.S. Embassy in Tokyo announced Sunday that President Donald Trump’s “National Energy Dominance Council” will hold its first Indo-Pacific Energy Security Ministerial and Trade Forum with Japan in Tokyo on March 14 and 15.
The statement added that Interior Secretary Doug Burgon, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin will travel to Tokyo next month to meet with nearly 12 countries from the Indo-Pacific region for talks on energy security.
Burgom serves as the council's president, while Wright serves as vice president, according to Reuters.
The statement added that government leaders from several countries in the Indo-Pacific region and executives from sectors including energy, infrastructure, industry and finance will attend the forum.
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi told Trump in October that it would be difficult to ban imports of Russian liquefied natural gas. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65930
The Central Bank Of Iraq Clarifies The Mechanisms For Dealing With The Dollar In All Its Issuances.
Banks Economy News – Baghdad The Central Bank of Iraq, in a directive to licensed banks and non-bank financial institutions, stressed the importance of reducing discrimination in the exchange rate of the US dollar between old and new issues, stressing the need for all banks and financial institutions to adhere to the instructions for trading and exchanging banknotes, in accordance with the approved standards for foreign banknotes, especially the US dollar, in order to ensure the safety of monetary transactions and market stability.
The Central Bank clarified that the laws, instructions and regulations in force do not adopt any discrimination between the different editions of the US dollar currency, noting that the bank continues to receive these issues and deal with them through all authorized banks, provided that they are within the internationally and locally approved standards and regulations.
This clarification comes within the framework of the Central Bank of Iraq’s commitment to enhancing transparency and discipline in the banking sector, protecting customers, and supporting monetary and financial stability in Iraq. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65731
Supreme Court Ruling On Trump's Fees Ignites Legal Battle To Recover $170 Billion
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up Thousands of companies are preparing to launch what could become a protracted legal battle to recover up to $170 billion in tariffs they have already paid to the U.S. government, after the Supreme Court struck down a key trade policy tool of President Donald Trump, Bloomberg reported.
The Supreme Court did not address the issue of recovering the funds when it ruled on Friday that Trump did not have the legal authority to impose those tariffs under an emergency law.
"They take months to write their opinion, and they don't even discuss this point," Trump said during a press conference following the ruling, adding, "We will finish this in the courts within the next five years."
Following the Supreme Court's decision, the US president announced the immediate imposition of new global tariffs of 10%, based on a different legal provision. However, this will not stop the flood of lawsuits that companies intend to file in an effort to recover the tariffs they have paid.
Global Repercussions And Legal Preparations
The loss to the US administration is expected to reverberate across the global economy, as the size and scope of any potential recovery would be unprecedented, according to Bloomberg.
A wide range of companies, large and small, public and private, have spent the past months preparing to improve their legal positions to recover the fees they paid, should the court overturn Trump's actions.
Among the companies being asked to reimburse are retailers such as Costco, major industrial companies such as the American aluminum producer Alcoa, along with well-known brands and hundreds of small businesses. Most of these companies are based in the United States, but they also include local branches of foreign companies.
The White House announced on Saturday that the administration of US President Donald Trump will end some customs measures, following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the tariffs.
Among the key questions left unanswered for U.S. importers by the Supreme Court ruling are the opportunities and mechanisms for recovering funds collected by the government during the past year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the law that formed the core of the case.
The vote against the Trump administration's decisions was 6-3, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh dissenting, stating, "The Court today says nothing about whether, and if so, how, the government should return the billions of dollars it collected from importers." He added, "But that process is likely to be messy, as was acknowledged during oral arguments last November."
$170 billion
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has so far collected an estimated $170 billion in tariffs imposed by Trump based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the law that has been the subject of legal dispute, Bloomberg noted.
The court ruled that the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose customs duties was not legal, but the judges did not address the issue of importers' right to a refund, leaving these matters to the lower court to decide.
The case is scheduled to return to the U.S. Court of International Trade for a new round of legal wrangling.
While the judges were considering the case, more than 1,500 companies filed their own claims before the Commercial Court, with the aim of securing a place in the queue of those claiming a refund of fees.
In recent months, the U.S. Commercial Court has been pressing the Justice Department for at least a preliminary indication of how it will handle the issue of restitution if the administration loses to the Supreme Court.
US President Donald Trump is set to impose additional global tariffs of 10% within the next three days.
Retail and clothing companies were the most concerned, as the tariffs added significant costs for companies that import goods from Asian countries such as China and Vietnam.
The ruling comes amid a wave of earnings announcements from retailers, including Home Depot, which is scheduled to announce its results next Tuesday.
Although most companies report results for financial periods that ended before the decision was issued, Neil Saunders, managing director at data analytics firm GlobalData, said the move could affect earnings and future guidance.
He added: "If companies have already factored in very high costs for fees, there may be room for additional gains."
For his part, Zach Stambour, principal analyst at market research firm eMarketer, wrote: "While the decision provides some near-term relief, it does not dispel the broader uncertainty surrounding trade policy that retailers and brands are facing."
He added: "We expect the ruling to create a moderate boost to retail sales starting this year, but this effect will gradually fade by 2028."
In written memoranda, government lawyers said the administration would not contest the court's authority to issue orders to recalculate duties, but left open the possibility of seeking to restrict the scope of importers eligible for refunds.
The U.S. Court of International Trade has experience in managing mass refunds. In 1998, after the Supreme Court overturned the port maintenance levy imposed on exporters, the court established a mechanism for receiving claims.
According to court records and reports from that period, the battle at the time involved approximately 4,000 cases and nearly $750 million in taxes paid.
However, the scope of the disputed tariffs imposed by Trump is much larger, as the US government informed the trade court that by the end of 2025, more than 300,000 importers had paid those tariffs.
Legal Dispute Over The Form Of Restitution
Ted Murphy, a partner at Sidley Austin, said the ruling means for importers "there is a possibility of a refund," adding that the form and duration of the refund process "are a big issue."
For his part, Daniel Mack, a partner at the international law firm Brian Cave Leighton Paysner, considered the issue of recovery to be "solvable," explaining that the Commercial Court could consolidate all individual claims into a single case.
The National Retail Federation called for a simplified refund mechanism, with David French, the federation's executive vice president of government relations, saying in a statement: "We urge the lower court to ensure a smooth process for returning duties to American importers," adding that easing the burden of duties would provide an economic boost that would allow companies to invest in their operations and other areas.
The emergency law of 1977 makes no mention of customs duties and has never been used to impose them. However, businesses remain subject to other customs procedures.
According to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the U.S. Treasury Department, which has about $774 billion in cash, has enough liquidity to reimburse the revenues from the duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, if ordered to do so, but the process could take weeks or months, and could extend for more than a year.
US President Donald Trump said on Friday he intends to use new trade powers in response to the Supreme Court ruling that overturned the sweeping tariffs.
Bisent also pointed out that refunds could turn into an "institutional waste" for companies that passed the burden of the fees on to consumers, asking: "Costco, which is suing the U.S. government, will it refund its customers?"
Michael Feder, chairman and co-founder of Lalo, a baby products company, told Bloomberg that his company will take all necessary steps to recover more than $2 million in fees it paid under the latest Supreme Court orders.
He added: "We don't expect refunds to be issued overnight even if our files are complete, but we want to be at the front of the line."
He noted that the company worked with its suppliers to reduce costs, and passed on only a "limited amount" of the fee burden to customers, and has not yet decided how to proceed if those funds are recovered, saying: "We'll cross that bridge when we get there."
Disparities Between Sectors And Companies
Bloomberg believes that some industries are likely to receive a larger share of the fees collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act up to December 14.
According to an analysis by Bloomberg Economics, the textiles, toys, food and beverage sectors top the list of industries that import finished goods, including wholesalers, retailers and manufacturers with factories outside the United States. Companies that import tariff-subject components to manufacture goods within the country are led by the machinery, electronics and automotive sectors.
Nicole Gorton-Karatelli and Chris Kennedy of Bloomberg Economics said the construction sector, from its purchases of electrical equipment and appliances that may be installed in new buildings, also appears to be particularly vulnerable.
They added that "the size of the company will play a role in determining the value of potential refunds, as any refunded amounts will go to the registered importer who actually paid the duties, meaning that large companies that import themselves will be more likely to receive a refund directly compared to small companies that buy from wholesale importers."
Joe Feldman, an analyst at Tielsey Advisory Group, said the ruling raises more questions than it provides definitive answers for the retail sector.
Congress was divided after the Supreme Court's ruling to overturn Trump's tariffs, with some Republicans and Democrats offering a cautious welcome, while Republican leaders sought an alternative course of action.
He explained that companies' attempts to recover the money they paid will take time, and that commodity prices often do not decrease after they rise, with the exception of basic commodities such as milk and eggs.
Although some operators may benefit from improved profit margins in the near term, they are unlikely to get a sudden cash flow or radically change their pricing structure.
Meanwhile, customs brokers and lawyers warned companies that the US administration might place obstacles in the way of obtaining refunds, such as requiring companies to prove that they did not pass the cost on to consumers, or to provide detailed documentation for each shipment.
Currently, importers are required to at least organize their records in anticipation of refund claims being paid, even if the mechanism for this is not yet clear.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection recently announced that, effective February 6, the Treasury Department will no longer issue the agency's refunds via paper checks, but will instead switch to electronic payments.
US Debt Crisis to Trigger Currency Collapse
US Debt Crisis to Trigger Currency Collapse
WTFinance: 2-21-2026
The current state of the global financial system is a complex and precarious web of fiat currencies, debt, and asset markets.
In a recent episode of the What the Finance (WTFinance) podcast, host Anthony Fatseas engaged in a thought-provoking discussion with guest Francis Hunt, shedding light on the inherent flaws and potential catastrophic consequences of the existing financial paradigm.
US Debt Crisis to Trigger Currency Collapse
WTFinance: 2-21-2026
The current state of the global financial system is a complex and precarious web of fiat currencies, debt, and asset markets.
In a recent episode of the What the Finance (WTFinance) podcast, host Anthony Fatseas engaged in a thought-provoking discussion with guest Francis Hunt, shedding light on the inherent flaws and potential catastrophic consequences of the existing financial paradigm.
At the heart of the issue lies the inextricable link between fiat money and debt.
Hunt astutely observes that debt is, in essence, fiat currency promised for future repayment, tied together by interest rates and usury.
This chronic debasement of both fiat and debt has far-reaching implications, including rising interest rates and soaring stock markets.
The dramatic resurgence of Japan’s Nikkei index, which has broken free from its 31-year stagnation, is a case in point. While this may appear to be a bullish signal, Hunt cautions that it masks a more sinister reality when viewed through the lens of a stable unit of account like gold.
The nominal gains in stock markets worldwide belie a persistent loss of real value, underscoring a global trend of asset rebasement and real-term losses.
The United States, as the issuer of the global reserve currency, is uniquely vulnerable to Triffin’s dilemma. To maintain its global dominance, the US must supply excess currency to the world, but this comes at the cost of a deepening loss in purchasing power and living standards.
Hunt argues that official inflation statistics and economic data are deliberately manipulated to obscure the true extent of currency debasement and economic malaise.
Japan’s unprecedented government asset purchases are seen by some as a potential blueprint for the US to stabilize its financial system.
However, Hunt remains skeptical about the long-term efficacy of such measures. Instead, he points to the growing accumulation of gold by nations like China as a sign of a global shift away from fiat debt instruments.
As confidence in these instruments erodes, the real wealth transfer is taking place in the opposite direction – towards those who have opted for a more tangible store of value.
The conversation also touched on the silver market, with Hunt providing technical insights and price targets that suggest a continuation of the long-term precious metals bull market. While silver’s price movements are characterized by rapid appreciation followed by sharp corrections, the overall trend remains decidedly bullish.
One of the most ominous warnings issued by Hunt pertains to the emerging digital monetary system. He cautions against the blind faith being placed in centralized digital currencies and the World Economic Forum’s agendas, highlighting their potential for global surveillance, control, and the consolidation of asset ownership through tokenization.
As the world hurtles towards a dystopian financial future, Hunt urges listeners to remain vigilant and adopt gold as their true unit of account.
In a world where the financial and spiritual wars are being waged simultaneously, protecting one’s wealth and freedom is paramount.
As the global financial system continues to unravel, the insights offered by Hunt and Fatseas serve as a stark reminder of the need for awareness and resistance. We must be prepared to challenge the status quo and safeguard our financial future.
For those seeking a deeper understanding of the complex issues at play, we recommend watching the full video from WTFinance.
The discussion offers a sobering perspective on the state of the global financial system and the imperative of adopting a more informed and proactive approach to wealth preservation.
Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Saturday Afternoon 2-21-26
Good Afternoon Dinar Recaps,
TRADE RESET ESCALATES: Trump Raises Global Tariffs to 15% After Court Showdown
Supreme Court ruling reshapes executive trade power as White House pivots fast
Good Afternoon Dinar Recaps,
TRADE RESET ESCALATES: Trump Raises Global Tariffs to 15% After Court Showdown
Supreme Court ruling reshapes executive trade power as White House pivots fast
Overview
In a dramatic policy reversal, President Donald Trump increased the global tariff rate from 10% to 15% under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, just hours after the Supreme Court of the United States struck down the administration’s use of emergency authority under IEEPA.
The ruling limits executive tariff power, but the administration’s rapid pivot keeps trade tensions elevated. Major partners including the United Kingdom, EU members, and BRICS nations now face higher baseline costs, with Congress holding authority over any extension beyond 150 days.
Key Developments
1. Supreme Court Restricts Emergency Tariff Authority
The Court ruled that IEEPA does not authorize sweeping tariff impositions, reinforcing constitutional separation of powers in trade policy.
2. 15% Global Tariff Activated
Using Section 122, the White House imposed a 15% tariff on imports from all countries — effective immediately — pending further congressional action.
3. Revenue Stability Claimed by Treasury
Officials indicated combined tariff tools could preserve federal revenue streams despite the legal setback.
4. Strategic Trade Uncertainty Increases
The administration signaled more tools may be deployed, leaving global trade partners bracing for further volatility.
Why It Matters
This is more than a tariff hike — it is a structural confrontation over who controls U.S. trade policy. The ruling injects constitutional guardrails into executive trade authority, but the administration’s response ensures continued volatility in global supply chains, pricing, and bilateral negotiations.
Supply chains that had begun stabilizing may now face recalibration, especially across Asia and Europe. Countries already pursuing de-risking strategies may accelerate diversification efforts away from U.S.-centric trade exposure.
Tariff volatility is no longer policy noise — it is a catalyst for structural realignment in global commerce.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
Tariff policy instability directly affects currency valuations. Trade shocks alter capital flows, distort import/export balances, and create unpredictable demand for reserve currencies.
For BRICS nations and emerging markets, heightened U.S. trade unpredictability strengthens the incentive to expand alternative payment systems and local-currency settlement frameworks. For currency holders, volatility introduces both safe-haven inflows and longer-term questions about policy reliability.
Implications for the Global Reset
Pillar 1: Institutional Recalibration
The Court’s decision reasserts legislative authority in trade governance, signaling structural shifts within the U.S. policy framework.Pillar 2: Accelerated Trade Bloc Realignment
Countries may hedge against U.S. unpredictability by strengthening regional trade corridors and multipolar agreements.Pillar 3: Reserve Currency Tension
Policy volatility fuels debate over dollar dominance and encourages diversification into alternative settlement systems and hard assets.
This episode reinforces how trade law, constitutional limits, and geopolitical rivalry intersect in shaping the next phase of global economic restructuring.
When trade law becomes a constitutional battleground, global markets feel the tremors.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
Financial Times — “Trump raises global tariffs to 15% after Supreme Court ruling”
Reuters — “U.S. Supreme Court limits emergency tariff authority”
~~~~~~~~~~
MARKETS REPRICE RISK: Stocks Surge, Bonds Fall as Trade Tensions Shift
Investors recalibrate amid policy volatility and shifting safe-haven flows
Overview
Global markets reacted sharply to evolving U.S. trade policy developments. Equities rallied on hopes that tariff uncertainty may stabilize, while bonds sold off as investors rotated into risk assets. The U.S. dollar softened slightly as traders reassessed safe-haven positioning.
The reaction illustrates a broader repricing cycle — one that reflects investor sensitivity to geopolitical signals and fiscal uncertainty.
Key Developments
1. Global Equities Advance
Major indices in the U.S., Europe, and Asia moved higher as markets interpreted trade developments as less disruptive than feared.
2. Bond Yields Rise
Treasury prices declined, pushing yields upward as capital rotated away from defensive positions.
3. Dollar Softens on Risk Appetite
The dollar edged lower as traders reduced safe-haven exposure and shifted toward equities.
4. Policy Uncertainty Remains Embedded
Despite the rally, markets remain highly sensitive to future tariff announcements and congressional action.
Why It Matters
Markets are signaling conditional optimism — but beneath the surface lies structural fragility. Rising yields increase borrowing costs globally, while equity rallies can quickly reverse if trade tensions re-escalate.
The interplay between policy headlines and asset pricing underscores how tightly connected geopolitics and capital markets have become.
Every shift in capital flow signals a deeper transition beneath the surface of the financial system.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
Currency holders must watch capital flow patterns carefully. When equities rally and bonds sell off, liquidity shifts rapidly across borders. A softening dollar may provide short-term relief for emerging markets, yet longer-term instability could accelerate diversification strategies.
For nations pursuing de-dollarization or gold accumulation strategies, volatility reinforces the case for hedging against policy-driven swings in reserve assets.
Markets are no longer reacting to fundamentals alone — they are pricing geopolitical uncertainty in real time.
Implications for the Global Reset
Pillar 1: Capital Flow Realignment
Rapid movement between equities, bonds, and currencies highlights fragility in the global liquidity structure.Pillar 2: Inflation & Yield Pressure
Rising yields could complicate central bank policy decisions amid tariff-driven price pressures.Pillar 3: Safe-Haven Competition
Gold, commodities, and alternative currencies may see renewed strategic demand as volatility persists.
The broader message is clear: asset markets are increasingly acting as transmission mechanisms for geopolitical recalibration.
This is not merely a regional issue — it is a pressure point in the evolving global order.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
~~~~~~~~~~
Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble
Newshound's News Telegram Room Link
RV Facts with Proof Links Link
RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link
Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX
Follow Fast Facts
Seeds of Wisdom Team™ Website
Thank you Dinar Recaps
Iraq Economic News and Points To Ponder Saturday Afternoon 2-21-26
Coordination Framework To Decide On Nouri Al-Maliki’s Premiership Nomination
2026-02-21 / 09:54 Shafaq News- Baghdad Iraq’s Coordination Framework is preparing to hold an expanded meeting to resolve the ongoing political deadlock by deciding whether to maintain or withdraw Nouri al-Maliki’s nomination for prime minister, informed sources told Shafaq News on Saturday.
Coordination Framework To Decide On Nouri Al-Maliki’s Premiership Nomination
2026-02-21 / 09:54 Shafaq News- Baghdad Iraq’s Coordination Framework is preparing to hold an expanded meeting to resolve the ongoing political deadlock by deciding whether to maintain or withdraw Nouri al-Maliki’s nomination for prime minister, informed sources told Shafaq News on Saturday.
The Coordination Framework, an alliance of Shiite political forces, is seeking to reach a unified position on its candidate for the premiership amid divisions within the bloc, the sources said, revealing that discussions in the next meeting will focus on selecting a figure suited to the country’s current economic and security challenges. The alliance is also expected to coordinate on setting a date for a parliamentary session to elect a new president, who would then formally task the Framework, as the largest parliamentary bloc, to nominate the next prime minister.
Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Al-Maliki holds to Iraq's premiership bid as CF weighs alternative
The meeting will address whether to keep the nomination of State of Law Coalition leader Nouri al-Maliki, whether he would withdraw personally, or whether the alliance would officially revoke his candidacy and search for an alternative.
The Framework has been divided over al-Maliki’s bid to return to office, with the head of the Al-Hikma Movement, Ammar al-Hakim, and Asaib Ahl al-Haq leader Qais al-Khazali expressing reservations about his candidacy. International reactions, including warnings from the United States over the potential implications of his selection, have also raised concerns among some Sunni factions.
Al-Maliki, who served as prime minister for eight years between 2006 and 2014, has repeatedly said he remains committed to his candidacy, adding that any reversal must come through a formal decision by the Coordination Framework.
Read more: Nouri Al-Maliki’s new doctrine for power: Pragmatism over defiance?
Iraq Bloc May Drop Maliki From PM Nomination After US Threats
MENA The New Arab Staff 21 February, 2026 Iraq’s ruling bloc has moved to drop Nouri al-Maliki as PM candidate after US warns of sanctions and possible review of ties.
Iraq’s ruling Coordination Framework coalition is moving towards abandoning Nouri al-Maliki’s bid for prime minister following US pressure and internal divisions, according to senior political sources.
The shift comes after what Iraq’s Foreign Ministry described on Thursday as "verbal" US messages rejecting Maliki’s nomination and warning of possible sanctions targeting Iraqi individuals and institutions, as well as a potential reassessment of relations with Baghdad.
The ministry issued the statement to clarify remarks made by Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein to a local television channel.
Senior sources within the Coordination Framework told The New Arab's sister outlet Al-Araby Al-Jadeed that "movement has already begun over the past two days to abandon Maliki by reconsidering the decision and creating new conditions to discuss the post".
The sources said Maliki had indicated he would only withdraw if two-thirds of the alliance agreed to remove him, stating that "Maliki has confirmed he is prepared to step aside if two-thirds of the Framework alliance agree to remove him".
The nomination, approved by an internal majority vote within the pro-Iran alliance, has caused divisions among its leadership. Parties within the bloc are now seeking what sources described as a new formula to reverse the decision.
Political sources from the alliance told Al-Araby Al-Jadeed that "the number of political forces rejecting Maliki has increased over the past two days, with some rallying around the issue of Iraq’s supreme national interest following the US threats".
They added that "leaders of the Coordination Framework are seriously considering removing Maliki from the race for prime minister, but in a polite manner that does not anger the Islamic Dawa Party or push it to withdraw from political life or refuse to participate in the next government".
According to the same sources, a shortlist of four alternative names is under discussion. Among them is National Intelligence Service chief Hamid al-Shatri, described as the frontrunner due to his relations across the political spectrum and cooperation with international intelligence agencies, "especially the United States".
The sources also said current Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani is seeking another term, but that most forces do not support him. Basra Governor Asaad al-Eidani is also reportedly being considered.
They indicated that Ammar al-Hakim, Qais al-Khazali, Haider al-Abadi, and increasingly Hadi al-Amiri, along with Hammam Hamoudi, are leaning toward withdrawing Maliki’s nomination to avoid internal disputes and possible US sanctions.
However, officials from Maliki’s State of Law Coalition rejected reports of a retreat.
Hisham al-Rikabi, director of the coalition’s office, said reports of withdrawing Maliki’s candidacy were "claims and a malicious media campaign aimed at confusing public opinion". He said the Coordination Framework "remains committed to its declared political positions and to its candidate for the next phase".
Hussein al-Sadiq, a member of the coalition, said "the current media pressure aimed at isolating Maliki or pushing him to withdraw will not succeed", stressing that the nomination was a decision of the Coordination Framework, which he described as the largest parliamentary bloc.
He added that discussion of withdrawal would only take place if agreed within the alliance, saying it was illogical for Iraq to "submit to tweets and social media posts, whether from US President Donald Trump or anyone else".
Last month, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform: "The last time Maliki was in power, the country sank into poverty and massive chaos. That must not happen again… Because of his policies and crazy ideologies, if he is elected, the United States will not provide any future assistance to Iraq."
Political analyst Talal al-Jubouri told Al-Araby Al-Jadeed that the Coordination Framework is "in a bind and embarrassed" over Maliki’s nomination. He said some factions are seriously considering sidelining him to prevent further US intervention in Iraqi affairs.
Al-Jubouri warned that maintaining Maliki’s candidacy could place the Shia alliance in "an open and direct confrontation" with the US administration, particularly amid US demands regarding Iraqi armed factions and ties with Iran. Iraq bloc may drop Maliki from PM nomination after US threats
The Dollar Is On Track For Its Best Weekly Performance In Four Months
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up The dollar is on track for its best weekly performance since October on Friday, supported by a series of better-than-expected economic data, estimates that the Federal Reserve is leaning towards further monetary tightening, and tensions between the United States and Iran.
The dollar received additional support last night after data showed that the number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits fell more than expected last week, confirming the stability of the labor market.
The dollar held onto its gains in early Asian trading on Friday, leaving sterling struggling near a one-month low of $1.3457. Sterling is on track for a weekly decline of around 1.5 percent.
The euro fell 0.02 percent to $1.1768 and is on track for a weekly decline of 0.8 percent, weighed down by uncertainty over the continued tenure of European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde.
Against a basket of currencies, the dollar index hovered near its highest level in a month, which it recorded on Thursday, and reached 97.89 in recent trading. It is on track to achieve a weekly gain of more than one percent, which would represent its strongest performance in more than four months.
Fears of a conflict between the United States and Iran have contributed to supporting the dollar this week as a safe haven.
US President Donald Trump warned Iran on Thursday that it must reach an agreement on its nuclear program or "very bad things" will happen, setting a deadline of 10 to 15 days, prompting Tehran to threaten to retaliate by targeting US bases in the region if it is attacked.
Markets are currently awaiting the US core personal consumption expenditures price index and fourth-quarter GDP data due later today.
According to the CME FedWatch tool, investors still expect the US central bank to cut interest rates twice this year, although expectations of such a move in June have fallen to about 58 percent from 62 percent a week ago.
The Australian dollar fell 0.08 percent to $0.7055, but is expected to lose only 0.2 percent over the week, as it remains supported by expectations of tighter monetary policy at home. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65855
Supreme Court Ruling On Trump's Fees Ignites Legal Battle To Recover $170 Billion
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up Thousands of companies are preparing to launch what could become a protracted legal battle to recover up to $170 billion in tariffs they have already paid to the U.S. government, after the Supreme Court struck down a key trade policy tool of President Donald Trump, Bloomberg reported.
The Supreme Court did not address the issue of recovering the funds when it ruled on Friday that Trump did not have the legal authority to impose those tariffs under an emergency law.
"They take months to write their opinion, and they don't even discuss this point," Trump said during a press conference following the ruling, adding, "We will finish this in the courts within the next five years."
Following the Supreme Court's decision, the US president announced the immediate imposition of new global tariffs of 10%, based on a different legal provision. However, this will not stop the flood of lawsuits that companies intend to file in an effort to recover the tariffs they have paid.
Global Repercussions And Legal Preparations
The loss to the US administration is expected to reverberate across the global economy, as the size and scope of any potential recovery would be unprecedented, according to Bloomberg.
A wide range of companies, large and small, public and private, have spent the past months preparing to improve their legal positions to recover the fees they paid, should the court overturn Trump's actions.
Among the companies being asked to reimburse are retailers such as Costco, major industrial companies such as the American aluminum producer Alcoa, along with well-known brands and hundreds of small businesses. Most of these companies are based in the United States, but they also include local branches of foreign companies.
The White House announced on Saturday that the administration of US President Donald Trump will end some customs measures, following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the tariffs.
Among the key questions left unanswered for U.S. importers by the Supreme Court ruling are the opportunities and mechanisms for recovering funds collected by the government during the past year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the law that formed the core of the case.
The vote against the Trump administration's decisions was 6-3, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh dissenting, stating, "The Court today says nothing about whether, and if so, how, the government should return the billions of dollars it collected from importers." He added, "But that process is likely to be messy, as was acknowledged during oral arguments last November."
$170 billion
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has so far collected an estimated $170 billion in tariffs imposed by Trump based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the law that has been the subject of legal dispute, Bloomberg noted.
The court ruled that the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose customs duties was not legal, but the judges did not address the issue of importers' right to a refund, leaving these matters to the lower court to decide.
The case is scheduled to return to the U.S. Court of International Trade for a new round of legal wrangling.
While the judges were considering the case, more than 1,500 companies filed their own claims before the Commercial Court, with the aim of securing a place in the queue of those claiming a refund of fees.
In recent months, the U.S. Commercial Court has been pressing the Justice Department for at least a preliminary indication of how it will handle the issue of restitution if the administration loses to the Supreme Court.
US President Donald Trump is set to impose additional global tariffs of 10% within the next three days.
Retail and clothing companies were the most concerned, as the tariffs added significant costs for companies that import goods from Asian countries such as China and Vietnam.
The ruling comes amid a wave of earnings announcements from retailers, including Home Depot, which is scheduled to announce its results next Tuesday.
Although most companies report results for financial periods that ended before the decision was issued, Neil Saunders, managing director at data analytics firm GlobalData, said the move could affect earnings and future guidance.
He added: "If companies have already factored in very high costs for fees, there may be room for additional gains."
For his part, Zach Stambour, principal analyst at market research firm eMarketer, wrote: "While the decision provides some near-term relief, it does not dispel the broader uncertainty surrounding trade policy that retailers and brands are facing."
He added: "We expect the ruling to create a moderate boost to retail sales starting this year, but this effect will gradually fade by 2028."
In written memoranda, government lawyers said the administration would not contest the court's authority to issue orders to recalculate duties, but left open the possibility of seeking to restrict the scope of importers eligible for refunds.
The U.S. Court of International Trade has experience in managing mass refunds. In 1998, after the Supreme Court overturned the port maintenance levy imposed on exporters, the court established a mechanism for receiving claims.
According to court records and reports from that period, the battle at the time involved approximately 4,000 cases and nearly $750 million in taxes paid.
However, the scope of the disputed tariffs imposed by Trump is much larger, as the US government informed the trade court that by the end of 2025, more than 300,000 importers had paid those tariffs.
Legal Dispute Over The Form Of Restitution
Ted Murphy, a partner at Sidley Austin, said the ruling means for importers "there is a possibility of a refund," adding that the form and duration of the refund process "are a big issue."
For his part, Daniel Mack, a partner at the international law firm Brian Cave Leighton Paysner, considered the issue of recovery to be "solvable," explaining that the Commercial Court could consolidate all individual claims into a single case.
The National Retail Federation called for a simplified refund mechanism, with David French, the federation's executive vice president of government relations, saying in a statement: "We urge the lower court to ensure a smooth process for returning duties to American importers," adding that easing the burden of duties would provide an economic boost that would allow companies to invest in their operations and other areas.
The emergency law of 1977 makes no mention of customs duties and has never been used to impose them. However, businesses remain subject to other customs procedures.
According to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the U.S. Treasury Department, which has about $774 billion in cash, has enough liquidity to reimburse the revenues from the duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, if ordered to do so, but the process could take weeks or months, and could extend for more than a year.
US President Donald Trump said on Friday he intends to use new trade powers in response to the Supreme Court ruling that overturned the sweeping tariffs.
Bisent also pointed out that refunds could turn into an "institutional waste" for companies that passed the burden of the fees on to consumers, asking: "Costco, which is suing the U.S. government, will it refund its customers?"
Michael Feder, chairman and co-founder of Lalo, a baby products company, told Bloomberg that his company will take all necessary steps to recover more than $2 million in fees it paid under the latest Supreme Court orders.
He added: "We don't expect refunds to be issued overnight even if our files are complete, but we want to be at the front of the line."
He noted that the company worked with its suppliers to reduce costs, and passed on only a "limited amount" of the fee burden to customers, and has not yet decided how to proceed if those funds are recovered, saying: "We'll cross that bridge when we get there."
Disparities Between Sectors And Companies
Bloomberg believes that some industries are likely to receive a larger share of the fees collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act up to December 14.
According to an analysis by Bloomberg Economics, the textiles, toys, food and beverage sectors top the list of industries that import finished goods, including wholesalers, retailers and manufacturers with factories outside the United States. Companies that import tariff-subject components to manufacture goods within the country are led by the machinery, electronics and automotive sectors.
Nicole Gorton-Karatelli and Chris Kennedy of Bloomberg Economics said the construction sector, from its purchases of electrical equipment and appliances that may be installed in new buildings, also appears to be particularly vulnerable.
They added that "the size of the company will play a role in determining the value of potential refunds, as any refunded amounts will go to the registered importer who actually paid the duties, meaning that large companies that import themselves will be more likely to receive a refund directly compared to small companies that buy from wholesale importers."
Joe Feldman, an analyst at Tielsey Advisory Group, said the ruling raises more questions than it provides definitive answers for the retail sector.
Congress was divided after the Supreme Court's ruling to overturn Trump's tariffs, with some Republicans and Democrats offering a cautious welcome, while Republican leaders sought an alternative course of action.
He explained that companies' attempts to recover the money they paid will take time, and that commodity prices often do not decrease after they rise, with the exception of basic commodities such as milk and eggs.
Although some operators may benefit from improved profit margins in the near term, they are unlikely to get a sudden cash flow or radically change their pricing structure.
Meanwhile, customs brokers and lawyers warned companies that the US administration might place obstacles in the way of obtaining refunds, such as requiring companies to prove that they did not pass the cost on to consumers, or to provide detailed documentation for each shipment.
Currently, importers are required to at least organize their records in anticipation of refund claims being paid, even if the mechanism for this is not yet clear.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection recently announced that, effective February 6, the Treasury Department will no longer issue the agency's refunds via paper checks, but will instead switch to electronic payments. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65907
“Tidbits From TNT” Saturday 2-21-2026
TNT:
Tishwash: Strategic partnership between the Iraqi and German banking sectors to enhance financial integration
The Association of Iraqi Private Banks announced on Friday a strategic partnership between the Iraqi and German banking sectors to enhance financial integration.
In a statement received by the Iraqi News Agency (INA), the Association said it had renewed its cooperation agreement with the Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, a strategic step reflecting both sides' commitment to strengthening professional integration between the banking sectors in Iraq and Germany and supporting institutional development according to best practices and international standards.
TNT:
Tishwash: Strategic partnership between the Iraqi and German banking sectors to enhance financial integration
The Association of Iraqi Private Banks announced on Friday a strategic partnership between the Iraqi and German banking sectors to enhance financial integration.
In a statement received by the Iraqi News Agency (INA), the Association said it had renewed its cooperation agreement with the Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, a strategic step reflecting both sides' commitment to strengthening professional integration between the banking sectors in Iraq and Germany and supporting institutional development according to best practices and international standards.
The statement added that the agreement was signed by Ahmed Al-Hashemi, Deputy Executive Director of the Association of Iraqi Private Banks, and Econ Döse, Director of the International Consulting Department at the university, confirming both parties' keenness to expand cooperation to include areas with a greater impact on banking performance, governance, and financial innovation.
The Association noted that the renewal of the agreement is a continuation of cooperation in the areas of specialized banking training, consulting, strategy development, institutional capacity building, exchange of technical expertise, support for digital transformation, compliance, and risk management, which will contribute to raising the readiness of Iraqi banks and enhancing their competitiveness.
According to the statement, both sides affirmed that "the next phase will witness a more active role for both parties as an institutional and professional link between the Iraqi and German banking sectors, through the establishment of direct communication channels, the organization of joint dialogue and cooperation platforms, and the facilitation of knowledge and expertise exchange between financial institutions in both countries."
They emphasized that "this partnership will support enhancing the Iraqi banking sector's access to German institutions and markets, and stimulate the interest and investments of German banks and companies in Iraq, by providing a supportive professional environment, enhancing understanding of regulatory frameworks and investment opportunities, and building mutual trust, thus paving the way for launching sustainable financial and economic partnerships."
The statement indicated that "this step is in line with the Central Bank of Iraq's directions for banking reform and enhancing institutional and digital efficiency, which will strengthen the integration of the Iraqi financial sector into the international financial system and open broader horizons for economic integration between Iraq and Germany." link
************
Tishwash: US outlines 7 demands for Iraq's next PM in diplomatic letter
The letter places heavy emphasis on reducing Iranian influence in Baghdad's political and security affairs amid ongoing US-Iran tensions and Iraq's prolonged government formation process following the November 2025 elections
The letter underscores how Iraq's government formation has become a key arena in the larger US-Iran contest for regional dominance
The United States delivered a pointed diplomatic message to Iraqi leaders, outlining seven specific demands for the selection and performance of the country's next prime minister.
The letter, reported by Al-Monitor on Thursday, places heavy emphasis on reducing Iranian influence in Baghdad's political and security affairs amid ongoing US-Iran tensions and Iraq's prolonged government formation process following the November 2025 elections.
The seven demands
According to sources familiar with the correspondence, the US letter specifies the following conditions for the incoming prime minister and the government they lead:
Elect a prime minister who prioritizes Iraqi national interests above external alignments, particularly those tied to Tehran.
Institutionalize and bring the Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) — a coalition of mostly Shia militias, many backed by Iran — fully under state control, limiting their independent operations.
Reduce corruption and combat money laundering, with a focus on disrupting illicit financial networks that benefit Iranian-aligned groups.
Limit or exclude Iranian-backed militias from key positions in the new cabinet and security apparatus.
Strengthen Iraq's sovereignty by curbing foreign interference, especially from Iran, in domestic governance and decision-making.
Enhance cooperation with the United States on security, counterterrorism, and economic matters as a partner rather than a conduit for regional rivals.
Implement reforms to promote inclusive governance, economic diversification away from oil dependency, and accountability to prevent sectarian divisions.
The demands reflect the Trump administration's broader strategy to weaken Iran's regional proxy network, particularly in Iraq, where Tehran has long exerted influence through political parties, militias, and economic ties.
Context amid government formation deadlock
Iraq remains without a new government more than three months after parliamentary elections, with the Shia Coordination Framework — the largest bloc — initially nominating former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in late January 2026. Maliki, who served from 2006 to 2011, is widely viewed in Washington as closely aligned with Iran and responsible for sectarian policies that fueled instability and the rise of ISIS.
President Donald Trump publicly rejected Maliki's candidacy on Truth Social in late January, warning that the US would "no longer help Iraq" if he returned to power. Subsequent reports indicated threats of severe measures, including restrictions on Iraq's access to oil revenues held at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York — a lifeline accounting for roughly 90% of the federal budget.
The US letter, delivered amid these pressures, appears to formalize Washington's red lines. It builds on earlier warnings, including potential sanctions against Iraq's Central Bank, Oil Ministry, and officials linked to Iranian-backed groups if Maliki's nomination persists.
Some Framework factions have since signaled willingness to reconsider Maliki, with reports suggesting a possible extension of caretaker Prime Minister Mohammad Shia al-Sudani's term or selection of a compromise figure acceptable to both domestic stakeholders and Washington.
Broader geopolitical stakes
The demands arrive as US-Iran indirect negotiations continue, with Washington pushing Tehran to curb its nuclear program, ballistic missiles, and support for proxies — including Iraqi militias. Iraq sits at the heart of this rivalry: US forces maintain a presence for counter-ISIS operations, while Iranian-aligned groups have targeted American interests in the past.
By conditioning future cooperation — and implicitly threatening economic leverage — on compliance, the US seeks to reshape Iraq's political landscape.
Analysts note that success could enhance Iraqi sovereignty and stability, but failure risks deepening divisions or triggering financial crisis. link
*************
Tishwash: Iraq has no alternatives if Hormuz is closed... we have no option but "divine solutions".
Economic expert Nabil Al-Marsoumi warned on Friday of catastrophic repercussions for the Iraqi economy if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, stressing that Iraq would practically lose its ability to export its oil through its southern ports, which would reduce its exports from about 3.4 million barrels per day to about 210,000 barrels only, with 200,000 barrels through the Turkish port of Ceyhan and 10,000 barrels per day to Jordan by tankers.
Al-Marsoumi explained that a potential rise in oil prices to $150 per barrel would not compensate for the loss, as monthly revenues would decline from about $7 billion to less than $1 billion, an amount that covers only 14% of salaries. He pointed out that Iraq, unlike Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iran, does not currently have alternative outlets ready for exporting oil, making it the most vulnerable to any potential closure of the Strait.
Al-Marsoumi asked in a post followed by 964 Network , “What would happen to Iraq if Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz?” He pointed out that “if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, Iraq will be prevented from exporting its oil south by sea, and Iraq’s oil exports will decrease from 3.4 million barrels per day to 210,000 barrels per day, of which 200,000 barrels will be from the Turkish port of Ceyhan and 10,000 barrels per day to Jordan via tankers.”
He added that “even if the closure of the strait leads to oil prices rising to $150 a barrel, Iraqi oil revenues will decrease from about $7 billion a month to less than $1 billion, which is only enough to cover 14% of salaries. All of this will happen because Iraq, unlike Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Iran, does not currently have alternative routes ready for exporting oil.”
He concluded by saying: “Therefore, we have no solutions other than those from heaven that might prevent war or prevent the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.” link
*************
Mot: a tiny bit of Payback!!!!
Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Saturday Morning 2-21-26
Good Morning Dinar Recaps,
Iran at the Crossroads: Resistance State or Regional Reintegration?
Sanctions, nuclear diplomacy, and energy chokepoints converge at a decisive geopolitical moment.
Good Morning Dinar Recaps,
Iran at the Crossroads: Resistance State or Regional Reintegration?
Sanctions, nuclear diplomacy, and energy chokepoints converge at a decisive geopolitical moment.
Overview
Nearly five decades after the 1979 revolution, Iran stands at a structural turning point. The Islamic Republic, built on revolutionary ideology and resistance to Western influence, now faces mounting economic strain, generational pressure, and shifting regional power dynamics.
Since the U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear agreement in 2018, sanctions have sharply constrained oil exports, financial flows, and foreign investment. Inflation has remained elevated, the rial has weakened, and youth unemployment continues to challenge internal stability.
The question now is whether Tehran doubles down on resistance — or pivots toward reintegration into global markets.
Key Developments
1. Sanctions Pressure and Economic Strain
Following the U.S. exit from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, sanctions targeting oil, banking, and trade significantly reduced Iran’s formal economic integration. While limited discounted oil sales continue — primarily toward China — structural inefficiencies and inflation above 40% have strained households and businesses.
2. Nuclear Negotiations Remain Central
Western governments seek stronger assurances regarding Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities. Tehran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful but demands sanctions relief. A limited agreement could stabilize energy markets and ease domestic economic pressure, while failure risks escalation.
3. Strait of Hormuz as Strategic Lever
Iran’s geography gives it leverage over the Strait of Hormuz — a critical artery for global oil shipments. Even limited confrontation could disrupt supply flows and inject volatility into global energy pricing.
4. Regional Realignments Emerging
The diplomatic thaw between Tehran and Riyadh, brokered by China, signals recognition that prolonged confrontation is economically costly. Simultaneously, Iran’s alignment with Russia amid the Ukraine conflict has deepened Eastward integration — though not without secondary sanctions risk.
Why It Matters
Iran’s trajectory affects far more than its domestic politics.
• Energy market stability hinges on Gulf security
• Sanctions influence global oil supply elasticity
• Nuclear negotiations shape regional security architecture
• Trade corridors across Eurasia intersect through Iranian territory
If Iran transitions toward economic normalization, it could become a key transit and energy node in multipolar trade networks. If confrontation intensifies, global markets would quickly price in risk premiums.
Energy chokepoints do not operate in isolation — they ripple through inflation, shipping, and monetary policy worldwide.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
Iran’s path directly influences global financial flows.
• Escalation boosts oil and safe-haven assets
• De-escalation stabilizes energy-importing currencies
• Sanctions relief could increase non-dollar trade settlements
• Persistent volatility reinforces reserve diversification strategies
If tensions rise, the U.S. dollar benefits short term from safe-haven demand. However, prolonged geopolitical fragmentation could accelerate longer-term diversification conversations within emerging economies.
Implications for the Global Reset
Pillar 1: Energy Security as Monetary Anchor
Oil remains foundational to inflation expectations and sovereign stability. Disruption in the Gulf would force central banks into reactive policy positions, reshaping liquidity conditions.Pillar 2: Reintegration vs. Fragmentation
A negotiated path could integrate Iran into multipolar trade corridors such as the International North-South Transport Corridor, enhancing Eurasian connectivity. Conversely, escalation entrenches sanction-driven fragmentation.
Iran’s choice between resistance and reintegration will shape not only Middle Eastern security — but also the structure of global trade flows, energy pricing mechanisms, and monetary alignment.
This is not merely a regional issue — it is a pressure point in the evolving global order.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
Modern Diplomacy -- "Iran Between Resistance and Reintegration: A Geopolitical Turning Point"
Reuters -- "Iran nuclear talks and sanctions tensions impact regional markets"
~~~~~~~~~~
India–EU FTA: Strategic Courtship Turns Pragmatic
After two decades of negotiation, a high-stakes trade compromise reshapes global alignment.
Overview
India and the European Union have concluded negotiations on a landmark Free Trade Agreement (FTA) nearly twenty years in the making. The agreement liberalizes fully or partially 99% of Indian exports to Europe and over 95% of EU exports to India, covering a combined market exceeding $24 trillion and nearly 2 billion people.
The deal arrives at a pivotal moment. Both sides are recalibrating trade exposure amid rising protectionism, supply chain fragmentation, and geopolitical uncertainty. What once stalled over regulatory and sovereignty disputes has now matured into a pragmatic compromise shaped by economic necessity.
This is a defining year for India–EU relations — and potentially a structural shift in global trade flows.
Key Developments
1. Broad Market Liberalization
The EU grants preferential access across 97% of tariff lines for India, with roughly 90% of export value moving to zero duty immediately. Labor-intensive sectors such as textiles, apparel, marine products, leather, and gems benefit significantly.
India, in turn, liberalizes 92% of its tariff lines, covering 97.5% of EU exports, phasing reductions over five to ten years while shielding sensitive agricultural sectors.
2. Strategic Diversification
The EU is India’s largest trading partner, accounting for 11.5% of India’s total trade. For Europe, India remains an underpenetrated but fast-growing market. Both sides are seeking diversification amid slowing export growth to the U.S. and strategic recalibration away from concentrated trade corridors.
3. Sustainability Compromise
The EU softened earlier demands for sanction-backed environmental and labor enforcement. The final agreement shifts toward dialogue and voluntary alignment rather than punitive measures — making the deal politically acceptable in India.
4. Investment and Supply Chain Integration
The FTA is expected to stimulate foreign direct investment, deepen manufacturing integration, and support India’s Make in India strategy while offering European firms diversification opportunities.
Why It Matters
The India–EU FTA represents more than tariff adjustments — it signals adaptive realism in a fragmented global economy.
• Reduces overreliance on single trade partners
• Expands manufacturing and services integration
• Encourages diversified supply chain architecture
• Reinforces India’s emergence as a strategic economic hub
In a climate where mega-trade agreements are increasingly rare, this deal demonstrates that large democracies can still negotiate meaningful economic alignment.
Strategic diversification replaces concentrated dependency in a fractured trade era.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
Currency markets respond to structural trade shifts.
• Expanded trade flows influence euro and rupee liquidity dynamics
• Increased FDI supports capital account stability
• Diversification reduces exposure to U.S.-centric trade cycles
• Broader trade corridors can alter reserve allocation patterns
As India integrates more deeply with Europe, cross-border settlement volumes rise, potentially strengthening regional currency usage and reshaping capital flows.
When trade corridors shift, currency currents follow.
Implications for the Global Reset
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement reflects structural repositioning inside the global financial system. This is not disruption — it is redistribution.
Pillar 1: Multipolar Trade Architecture Strengthens
The agreement reinforces the gradual shift away from single-center trade dominance. As India deepens integration with Europe, economic gravity spreads across multiple hubs instead of concentrating in one dominant axis.
This strengthens the emerging multipolar trade framework — where influence is distributed, not centralized.
Pillar 2: Capital Flow Realignment Accelerates
Expanded trade volumes between India and the EU increase bilateral settlement flows, foreign direct investment channels, and currency usage outside traditional corridors.
Over time, this can reshape liquidity routes, reserve positioning, and cross-border settlement frameworks — subtle but foundational shifts in global finance plumbing.
Pillar 3: Strategic Autonomy Becomes Economic Policy
Both India and the EU structured this agreement to preserve sovereignty while expanding opportunity. This signals a broader reset principle: economic integration without political subordination.
Nations are no longer choosing sides — they are choosing leverage.
This is not a collapse of the old system — it is a recalibration of influence within it.
This is not merely a regional issue — it is a pressure point in the evolving global order.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
Modern Diplomacy -- "India–EU FTA: From Strategic Courtship to Pragmatic Compromise"
Reuters -- "India and EU conclude long-running free trade negotiations"
~~~~~~~~~~
Trump’s 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Loss Shakes Trade Order
Executive authority clash triggers 150-day tariff reset as BRICS reassess strategy
Overview
On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6–3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the president to impose sweeping tariffs. Within hours, President Donald Trump signed a new executive order invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, imposing a 10% global tariff on all countries for up to 150 days.
The ruling reshapes tariff authority. The executive response reshapes trade dynamics.
BRICS nations are watching closely.
Key Developments
1. Supreme Court Curtails Emergency Tariff Authority
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, stated that Congress did not clearly authorize tariff powers under IEEPA. The decision limits the executive branch’s use of emergency statutes for trade measures.
2. 10% Global Tariff Enacted Under Section 122
Trump immediately pivoted to Section 122 authority, implementing a flat 10% tariff effective February 24. Congressional approval would be required to extend the measure beyond 150 days.
3. China and BRICS Rate Structures Adjust
China’s prior layered tariffs included two IEEPA-based 10% duties plus a 25% Section 301 tariff (45% combined). With IEEPA struck down, the effective rate drops to approximately 35% under the new structure.
For BRICS members such as India, Brazil, and South Africa — which previously faced reciprocal emergency-based adjustments — the temporary flat 10% may reduce short-term pressure.
4. Revenue and Refund Questions Emerge
Roughly $134 billion was reportedly collected under the now-invalidated IEEPA authority. The status of refunds remains unresolved. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that alternative statutory tools (Sections 122, 232, and 301) are expected to preserve tariff revenue levels into 2026.
Why It Matters
The ruling creates a constitutional boundary between emergency powers and trade authority. The executive branch responded not by retreating — but by reconfiguring.
Trade policy volatility increases risk premiums across supply chains.
Markets must now price in legal uncertainty alongside geopolitical strategy.
This is not just tariff policy — it is executive power recalibration in real time.
Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders
Global tariff unpredictability accelerates diversification conversations. BRICS nations advocating de-dollarization may use this episode to reinforce arguments for alternative settlement systems.
At the same time, a flat global tariff simplifies trade cost modeling in the short term — reducing complexity for emerging market exporters compared to tiered emergency duties.
However, the White House signaled that individual country rates could be restructured again using alternative statutes.
Stability remains conditional.
Currency markets do not fear tariffs — they fear unpredictability.
Implications for the Global Reset
The global financial reset does not happen through collapse. It unfolds through pressure points like this.
Pillar 1: Legal Authority Clarification
The Supreme Court decision reasserts Congressional primacy in tariff powers. This narrows unilateral executive leverage and may push future trade strategy toward more formal legislative frameworks.
Pillar 2: Strategic Trade Realignment
The 10% global tariff equalizes treatment temporarily, but it also incentivizes regional blocs to strengthen intra-bloc trade systems to buffer against U.S. policy swings.
Multipolar trade conversations gain urgency.
Pillar 3: Dollar Dominance vs. Diversification Pressure
While the U.S. dollar strengthened amid uncertainty, repeated trade volatility provides narrative fuel for BRICS payment alternatives and local currency settlement systems.
This tension between dollar resilience and diversification pressure is central to the reset.
The reset is not anti-dollar — it is anti-uncertainty.
This is not just politics — it’s global finance restructuring before our eyes.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive
Sources
Watcher.Guru — “Trump Imposes 10% Global Tariff After Court Loss, BRICS Watch Closely”
Reuters — “U.S. Supreme Court Limits President’s Emergency Tariff Authority”
~~~~~~~~~~
🌱 A Message to Our Currency Holders🌱
If you’ve been holding foreign currency for many years, you were not foolish.
You were not wrong to believe the global financial system would change.
What failed was not your patience — it was the information you were given.
For years, dates, rumors, and personalities replaced facts, structure, and proof. “This week” predictions created cycles of hope and disappointment that were never based on how currencies actually change.
That is not your failure.
Our mission here is different: • No dates • No rates • No hype • No gurus
Instead, we focus on:
• Verifiable developments • Institutional evidence
• Global financial structure • Where countries actually sit in the process
Currency value changes only come after sovereignty, trade, banking, settlement systems, and fiscal coordination are in place. History and institutions confirm this sequence.
You will see silence. You will see denials. That is not delay — that is discipline.
Protect your identity. Organize your documents. Verify everything.
Never hand your discernment to anyone who cannot show proof.
You deserve truth — not timelines.
Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News
~~~~~~~~~~
Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble
Newshound's News Telegram Room Link
RV Facts with Proof Links Link
RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link
Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX
Follow Fast Facts
Seeds of Wisdom Team™ Website
Thank you Dinar Recaps
Iraq Economic News and Points To Ponder Saturday Morning 2-21-26
Shocking Figures: The Total Amount Of Gold In Human History Reveals Astonishing Numbers.
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up Did you know that all the gold ever mined by humankind, from the beginning of history to the present day, could fit into a single cube measuring just 22 meters? Yes, gold is much smaller than you might imagine, but its value governs the global economy, according to a report by the World Gold Council.
By the end of 2024, humans had extracted 219,000 tons of gold, with the majority of this precious metal produced after 1950, meaning that the modern era produced most of the world's gold.
Shocking Figures: The Total Amount Of Gold In Human History Reveals Astonishing Numbers.
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up Did you know that all the gold ever mined by humankind, from the beginning of history to the present day, could fit into a single cube measuring just 22 meters? Yes, gold is much smaller than you might imagine, but its value governs the global economy, according to a report by the World Gold Council.
By the end of 2024, humans had extracted 219,000 tons of gold, with the majority of this precious metal produced after 1950, meaning that the modern era produced most of the world's gold.
Most importantly, gold does not deteriorate, which means that almost all the gold that was extracted still exists today, and perhaps the gold of the pharaohs is stored in the vaults of modern banks.
Read also Why are gold and silver prices jumping again?
When studying the global distribution of gold, we find that:
44% converted to jewelry
23% in bullion, coins, and investment funds
18% is owned by central banks
The remainder is used in industry and technology.
But the question for investors and economists remains: Will gold run out?
The globally known and recoverable reserves are estimated at only 55,000 tons, while the potential resources amount to 132,000 tons, but not all of them are mineable.
Therefore, gold remains a rare metal, which is the real reason why its value is pivotal in the global economy. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65862
Trump's Tariffs Will Take Effect On February 24 Despite The Supreme Court Ruling.
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up The White House announced on Saturday that the new tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump will take effect on February 24 and will remain in place for 150 days.
The White House said in a statement: "The decree imposes, for a period of 150 days, import duties of 10 percent on goods imported into the United States, and the temporary tariffs will take effect on February 24 at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time."
Trump had previously announced that he had signed an executive order imposing a 10 percent trade tariff on all countries.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday, by a vote of 6 to 3, that President Donald Trump is not authorized to impose global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPA).
Trump described the ruling as "very disappointing," accusing the court of being subservient to "foreign interests," and asserting that "all tariffs related to national security remain in effect."https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65889
1.085 Million Dinars For 21-Karat Gold… A New Rise In Gold Prices In Local Markets
Money and Business Economy News – Baghdad The markets of the capital Baghdad and Erbil witnessed a rise in the prices of foreign and Iraqi gold on Saturday, coinciding with the start of the weekly trading.
In Baghdad, gold prices in the wholesale markets on Al-Nahr Street recorded a significant increase, as the selling price of one mithqal of 21-karat Gulf, Turkish and European gold reached about 1.085 million dinars, while the buying price reached 1.081 million dinars, after it had recorded 1.073 million dinars at the end of last week.
As for Iraqi gold, 21 karat, the selling price reached 1,055,000 dinars per mithqal, and the buying price was 1,051,000 dinars.
In goldsmith shops, the selling price of a mithqal of 21-karat Gulf gold ranged between 1,085,000 and 1,095,000 dinars, while the selling price of a mithqal of Iraqi gold ranged between 1,055,000 and 1,065,000 dinars, according to the difference in crafting and manufacturing fees.
In Erbil, gold prices also rose, with the selling price of 22-karat gold reaching about 1,163,000 dinars, 21-karat gold reaching about 1,110,000 dinars, while the price of 18-karat gold reached about 952,000 dinars.
Goldsmiths rely on a formula that includes the price of an ounce in global markets and the dollar exchange rate in the local market to determine prices, which makes prices subject to change according to the movement of international markets and the price of the currency.
It is worth noting that gold prices had exceeded the one million dinar mark per mithqal last January, in a precedent that is the first of its kind in the local Iraqi markets . https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65896
Russia Sells 300,000 Ounces Of Gold As Prices Hit A Record High
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up Russia’s central bank sold about 300,000 ounces of gold from its reserves during January, taking advantage of prices reaching record levels.
Data published on Friday showed that Russia’s total gold holdings fell to 74.5 million ounces, the first decline since last October, according to Bloomberg.
Gold prices hit a record high last month, averaging nearly $4,700 an ounce, meaning the sale could have generated around $1.4 billion if executed at prevailing market prices.
According to the Russian Central Bank, the move comes within the framework of what is known as "mirror" operations, which are related to the Ministry of Finance selling assets of the National Welfare Fund, to compensate for the decline in oil and gas revenues amid a widening budget deficit.
During the first two months of 2025, the ministry spent about 419 billion rubles ($5.5 billion) from the fund through the sale of gold and foreign currency.
Despite the reduction in quantities, the total value of Russia’s gold reserves rose by 23% in January to $402.7 billion, driven by higher global prices.
Since the start of the war on Ukraine in 2022, rising gold prices have provided significant financial support to Moscow, given that a large portion of its foreign currency assets in Europe are frozen.https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65893
New Rise In Dollar Prices In Local Markets
Money and Business Economy News – Baghdad The exchange rate of the US dollar rose this morning, Saturday, in the markets of the capital, Baghdad and Erbil, coinciding with the opening of weekly trading.
In Baghdad, the price of the dollar in the main exchanges reached 152,700 Iraqi dinars per 100 dollars, compared to 152,300 dinars per 100 dollars at the close of trading last Thursday.
Selling prices in local market exchange shops reached 153,250 dinars for every 100 dollars, while the buying price reached 152,250 dinars for 100 dollars.
In Erbil, the selling price was recorded at 152,900 dinars per 100 dollars, while the buying price was 152,800 dinars per 100 dollars. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65892
The United Nations Circulates Iraq's Maritime Coordinates Following Their Deposit In Accordance With The Law Of The Sea Convention.
Money and Business Economy News – Baghdad The United Nations published a map of Iraqi maritime areas following its official deposit by the Republic of Iraq, based on the provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
According to a notification issued by the United Nations bearing the reference (MZN172.2026.LOS) and dated 18 February 2026, Iraq, on 19 January and 9 February 2026, deposited lists of the geographical coordinates of the points, accompanied by an explanatory map, in accordance with Article 16, Paragraph 2, Article 75, Paragraph 2, and Article 84, Paragraph 2 of the Convention.
The deposit relates to determining the straight baselines and the baselines emanating from the heights of the islands to measure the breadth of the territorial sea, in addition to determining the territorial sea, the contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of the Republic of Iraq, with the adoption of the 1984 World Geodetic System (WGS-84) as a reference for the adopted coordinates.
The document explained that the new filing replaces previous filings dating back to 2021 and 2011, while the lists of coordinates and the explanatory map were published on the website of the United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, in accordance with the approved procedures.
For its part, the Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that the deposit came in implementation of Cabinet Resolution No. (266) of 2025, which approved the map of Iraqi maritime areas prepared by a specialized technical and legal team, based on technical studies, hydrographic measurements and relevant international agreements.
The ministry stressed that the step comes within the framework of establishing Iraq’s maritime rights in accordance with international law, while respecting the rights of the countries of the region, and in a way that enhances security, stability and freedom of navigation in the region. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65903
Iraqis Ranked Fifth Among Nationalities Who Bought The Most Real Estate In Türkiye During The Month.
Money and Business Economy News - Follow-up The Turkish Statistical Institute announced on Saturday that Iraqis ranked fifth among the nationalities that purchased the most real estate in Türkiye during the month of January.
The agency stated that total home sales in Türkiye decreased by 2.1% during January compared to the same month of the previous year, recording 34,069 homes.
She added that home sales to foreigners also declined by 20.8% compared to the same period last year, reaching 1,306 homes, representing 1.2% of total home sales in the country during the month in question.
The agency noted that Russians topped the list of nationalities buying real estate in Turkey during January with 219 homes, followed by Iran in second place with 118 homes, and then Ukraine in third place with 77 homes.
The United Kingdom came in fourth with 75 homes purchased, followed by Iraq in fifth place with 74 homes, China in sixth with 73 homes, and Azerbaijan in seventh with 54 homes. Palestine ranked eighth with 40 homes, Afghanistan ninth with 38 homes, and Kazakhstan tenth with 29 homes.
It is worth noting that Iraqis topped the list of nationalities that bought the most homes in Turkey since 2015, before their ranking dropped to second place after Iran at the beginning of 2021, then to third place since April 2022 after the Russians topped the list of buyers, before settling later in fifth place according to the latest data.https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65899
The Iraqi Trade Bank Announces The Granting Of Loans For The Solar Energy Initiative.
Banks The Trade Bank of Iraq (TBI) announced on Friday that it has begun granting solar energy loans to employees who receive their salaries through the bank, while also confirming its continued financing of industrial projects and investment power plants.
TBI Chairman Bilal Al-Hamdani stated, "The bank has granted solar energy loans to employees who receive their salaries through the bank as part of its commitment to supporting alternative energy projects and reducing pressure on the electrical grid."
He explained that the bank's branch network is limited, as it primarily deals with institutions and business owners, in addition to employees who receive their salaries through the bank. He noted that the bank finances most investment power plants for investors and will continue to do so.
He added that the bank is committed to supporting industrial business owners, particularly those with existing industrial projects within Iraq and those in the food and pharmaceutical security sectors. He clarified that this support is provided through loans based on technical and economic feasibility studies.
He emphasized that the bank finances up to 75% of the value of an industrial project, provided that the approved terms and conditions are met. He pointed out that the lending mechanisms are clear and implemented in all branches, and that the bank has already financed a significant number of industrial projects in the recent period. https://economy-news.net/content.php?id=65875
MilitiaMan and Crew: IQD News Update-Oil Revenue-US Federal Reserve-REER-Dinar
MilitiaMan and Crew: IQD News Update-Oil Revenue-US Federal Reserve-REER-Dinar
2-20-2026
The Crew: Samson, PompeyPeter, Petra, Daytrader, Sunkissed, GIGI and Militia Man
Follow MM on X == https://x.com/Slashn
Be sure to listen to full video for all the news……..
MilitiaMan and Crew: IQD News Update-Oil Revenue-US Federal Reserve-REER-Dinar
2-20-2026
The Crew: Samson, PompeyPeter, Petra, Daytrader, Sunkissed, GIGI and Militia Man
Follow MM on X == https://x.com/Slashn
Be sure to listen to full video for all the news……..
Why the US Still Controls Iraq’s Dollar Pipeline
Why the US Still Controls Iraq’s Dollar Pipeline
Edu Matrix: 2-20-2026
In a recent Edu Matrix video, Sandy Ingram sheds light on a complex and critical issue that has significant implications for Iraq’s economy and sovereignty.
The United States has maintained control over Iraq’s oil revenue since the 2003 Iraq War, a situation that has far-reaching consequences for the country’s financial independence.
Why the US Still Controls Iraq’s Dollar Pipeline
Edu Matrix: 2-20-2026
In a recent Edu Matrix video, Sandy Ingram sheds light on a complex and critical issue that has significant implications for Iraq’s economy and sovereignty.
The United States has maintained control over Iraq’s oil revenue since the 2003 Iraq War, a situation that has far-reaching consequences for the country’s financial independence.
In this blog post, we’ll delve into the intricacies of this arrangement and explore its historical context, implications, and the tensions it has created.
Iraq is a wealthy nation thanks to its vast oil reserves. However, the country’s oil sales are conducted internationally in US dollars, and these funds are not deposited directly into Iraqi banks. Instead, they are held in an account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Although this account belongs to Iraq, it is subject to stringent US oversight and regulatory controls. This arrangement was initially designed to ensure transparency, prevent corruption, and reassure international creditors after Ssdaam Hussein’s regime.
The US control over Iraq’s oil revenue has significant implications for the country’s economy.
The arrangement effectively gives the US leverage over Iraq’s financial flows and economic sovereignty. Iraq cannot freely use its oil revenue without passing through US financial scrutiny, as the US system enforces compliance with sanctions, anti-money laundering, and counterterrorism regulations.
This control has real consequences, affecting Iraq’s ability to conduct dollar transactions and forcing it to tighten its banking and currency auction practices under US pressure.
The US control over Iraq’s oil revenue has also caused tension with neighboring Iran, which views Iraq as lacking full financial independence.
To understand the historical context of this arrangement, we need to look back at Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait and subsequent conflicts, which led to international intervention and coalition forces demanding financial safeguards.
The US decision to hold Iraq’s oil revenues in New York was partly to protect Iraq from lawsuits and financial claims by other nations that participated in the coalition.
Despite being controversial, this system remains a cornerstone of Iraq’s economic framework, demonstrating the ongoing influence of the US over Iraq’s financial sovereignty.
The arrangement has been in place for nearly two decades, and its implications continue to be felt today. As Sandy Ingram’s video highlights, this is a complex issue with multiple stakeholders and interests at play.
The US control over Iraq’s oil revenue is a complex and multifaceted issue that has significant implications for Iraq’s economy and sovereignty. While the arrangement was initially designed to ensure transparency and prevent corruption, it has effectively given the US leverage over Iraq’s financial flows and economic sovereignty.
As we continue to navigate the intricacies of global politics and economies, it’s essential to understand the historical context and ongoing implications of this arrangement. For further insights and information, watch the full Edu Matrix video featuring Sandy Ingram.
https://dinarchronicles.com/2026/02/20/edu-matrix-why-the-us-still-controls-iraqs-dollar-pipeline/