The Epicenter of the Next Crash is Not Banks
The Epicenter of the Next Crash is Not Banks
Kitco News: 12-10-2025
In a recent interview with Kitco News, I had the opportunity to sit down with James Grant, the founder of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, to discuss the critical developments shaping the US and global economies.
Our conversation touched on a range of pressing topics, from the resurgence of funding stress in US money markets to the potential for global financial volatility triggered by the Bank of Japan’s rate hike plans.
One of the key themes that emerged from our discussion was the ongoing challenge faced by the Federal Reserve in managing liquidity. The recent repo rate spikes are a clear indication of suppressed price discovery and hidden market stress, echoing the 2019 repo crisis.
According to Grant, the Fed’s response to such crises – injecting artificial liquidity into the system – may be masking true credit conditions and preventing genuine price discovery.
The Fed’s “fourth mandate” of ensuring smooth market functioning has become a double-edged sword. While it may provide short-term stability, it also creates a fragile and distorted financial environment.
Grant warns that this interventionist approach risks inflating asset bubbles and misallocating capital, particularly in areas like private credit and insurance sectors. These sectors may be vulnerable to a significant crisis once liquidity tightens or risk repricing occurs.
The current market leadership, driven by AI-related stocks, bears some resemblance to the tech exuberance of the late 1990s. Grant cautions that we may be witnessing overinvestment in short-lived technologies and infrastructure, which could ultimately lead to a painful correction.
Moreover, the Bank of Japan’s potential rate hikes and the unwinding of the yen carry trade are identified as possible triggers for global financial volatility that the Fed may struggle to counterbalance.
In the midst of this complex and uncertain economic backdrop, Grant offers some insightful analysis on the precious metals markets.
The historic silver price surge, alongside gold’s strength, is interpreted as a sign of growing market skepticism toward central bank policies. Silver’s unique volatility, as both a monetary and an industrial metal, makes it a fascinating barometer of market sentiment.
Grant suggests that these metals reflect a broader public “vote of no confidence” in monetary policy.
As we navigate the intricate web of global economic challenges, it’s clear that the Fed’s actions will be under intense scrutiny.
While the central bank’s intentions may be to stabilize the system, the unintended consequences of its interventions could be far-reaching. As investors and observers, it’s essential to remain vigilant and consider the potential risks and opportunities that lie ahead.
For those interested in delving deeper into this conversation, I encourage you to watch the full video interview on Kitco News. James Grant’s insights offer a nuanced understanding of the complex forces shaping our economy, and his warnings about the potential consequences of Fed intervention are certainly worth heeding.
In conclusion, the discussion with James Grant serves as a timely reminder of the importance of critical thinking and nuanced analysis in navigating the complexities of the global economy.
As we move forward, it’s crucial to remain aware of the hidden risks and potential pitfalls that lie beneath the surface, and to consider the long-term implications of the Fed’s actions.