Seeds of Wisdom RV and Economics Updates Tuesday Evening 2-24-26

Good  Evening Dinar Recaps,   

Geopolitics Overtakes Economics: The New Rules of Global Finance

From Tariffs to Central Banks, Power Now Trumps Policy Models

 Overview

This week’s financial landscape reveals a decisive shift: economic frameworks are being subordinated to geopolitical strategy.

From U.S. tariff maneuvers to Japan’s currency tolerance and Israel’s rate decisions, policymakers are increasingly prioritizing security threats, trade leverage, and strategic positioning over traditional economic indicators.

According to reporting compiled by Reuters, governments and central banks are recalibrating decisions around power, deterrence, and alliance management, not inflation models or textbook trade theory.

The pattern is clear: Money is now an instrument of statecraft.

Key Developments

1. Tariffs Reframed as Crisis Management

U.S. President Donald Trump replaced struck-down IEEPA tariffs with new 15% duties under Section 122, citing a balance-of-payments crisis tied to a $1.2 trillion trade deficit.

Former IMF official Gita Gopinath rejected the claim, noting the U.S. retains stable borrowing costs and market access — key indicators that no classical balance-of-payments crisis exists.

Strategic Impact:
Legal statutes are being repurposed to sustain tariff regimes. When one authority fails, another is invoked. Trade law is becoming flexible terrain in geopolitical contests.

2. Japan’s Yen Weakness Signals Strategic Tolerance

The yen weakened to around 155 per dollar, even amid speculation of intervention. Tokyo appears more willing to tolerate depreciation, balancing export competitiveness with fiscal flexibility.

Meanwhile, Japan is seeking assurances that new tariffs won’t “stack” on top of previous trade agreements tied to $550 billion in pledged U.S.-bound investment.

Strategic Impact:
Japan’s caution reflects a shift from economic optimization to risk containment diplomacy. Stability with Washington outweighs currency orthodoxy.

3. Israel Holds Rates Despite Easing Inflation

The Bank of Israel kept interest rates at 4%, even as inflation eased to 1.8%, within its 1–3% target range.

The reason: rising geopolitical uncertainty tied to Iran tensions.

Strategic Impact:
Monetary policy is no longer purely data-driven. Security risk is overriding inflation metrics, signaling a structural shift in central banking priorities.

4. Saudi Arabia’s Fiscal Expansion Accelerates

Saudi Arabia’s Q4 deficit widened to $25.28 billion, with full-year deficits exceeding revised projections as Vision 2030 projects accelerate.

Debt climbed sharply to 1.52 trillion riyals, reflecting expansionary policy despite moderate oil revenue growth.

Strategic Impact:
Mega-project diversification requires sustained borrowing. The fiscal gamble hinges on rapid non-oil growth before debt servicing pressures intensify.

5. Strategic Mineral Alliances Bypass Traditional Trade

Brazil and South Korea elevated ties into a strategic partnership targeting:

• Critical minerals

• AI development

• Green industries

• Renewed trade negotiations

As global tariff uncertainty grows, bilateral agreements are replacing multilateral confidence.

Strategic Impact:
Resource diplomacy is fragmenting supply chains into ideological blocs, accelerating “friendshoring” dynamics.

Why It Matters

We are witnessing a systemic pivot:

• Trade deficits framed as security threats

• Currency weakness tolerated for strategic aims

• Central banks prioritizing geopolitics over inflation

• Sovereign debt rising to fund diversification races

• Bilateral mineral deals replacing multilateral trust

Economic policy is becoming an extension of foreign policy.

This is not just market turbulence — it’s the weaponization of economic policy.

Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders

For those watching global financial realignment:

• Legal uncertainty increases currency volatility

• Security-driven rate policy distorts traditional forecasting models

• Supply-chain fragmentation pressures inflation dynamics

• Strategic trade blocs alter capital allocation flows

Markets may treat these as temporary disruptions. The evidence suggests structural shifts.

Implications for the Global Reset

• Pillar 1: Redefinition of Economic Crisis

Invoking “balance-of-payments crises” in stable economies redefines the legal threshold for protectionism worldwide.

• Pillar 2: Central Bank Mandate Evolution

Security risk is increasingly embedded into monetary decision-making frameworks.

• Pillar 3: Strategic Fragmentation

• Bilateral mineral pacts and tariff stacking fears indicate global trade is reorganizing into aligned blocs.

The rules governing globalization are being rewritten in real time.

This is not just tariff maneuvering — it’s the legal reengineering of trade authority.

Seeds of Wisdom Team View

Three fractures are widening:

• Legal fragility of tariff authority

• Unsustainable tribute-style trade dynamics

• Central banks subordinating economics to geopolitics

Markets remain calm.

Policy foundations are shifting.

When monetary frameworks bend toward security priorities, signaling mechanisms weaken — and volatility follows.

This is not just central bank discretion — it’s geopolitics overriding economic doctrine.

Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive

Sources

• Modern Diplomacy — "Financial Brief: A Weekly Roundup on the Geopolitics of Money | Feb 24"

• Reuters — "Global markets, tariffs and central bank policy updates"
  

~~~~~~~~~~

Taiwan at a Crossroads: Strategic Ambiguity Under Pressure

Rising PLA Activity and U.S. Arms Support Reshape Deterrence Calculus

Overview

Taiwan is emerging as one of the most volatile flashpoints in global geopolitics. According to recent analysis, the long-standing U.S. doctrine of strategic ambiguity toward Taiwan may require recalibration as military pressure from China intensifies.

Regular air and naval patrols, median line violations, and gray-zone coercion have become routine since 2022. Meanwhile, Washington has approved an $11.1 billion arms package to strengthen Taiwan’s asymmetric defenses.

The question is no longer ambiguity versus clarity — it is how to recalibrate deterrence without triggering escalation.

Key Developments

1. Surge in Chinese Military Pressure
China’s military spending has risen to over $230 billion in 2024, up sharply from 2016 levels.
PLA aircraft incursions into Taiwan’s ADIZ surpassed 1,700 in 2023, reflecting sustained operational pressure.

China’s newest aircraft carrier, Chinese aircraft carrier Fujian, launched in 2022, now operates near the Taiwan Strait, symbolizing expanded maritime reach.

2. Gray-Zone Coercion Becomes Routine
Frequent air and naval patrols and regular median-line crossings aim to:

• Drain Taiwan’s defense resources

• Normalize military pressure

• Avoid triggering direct U.S. intervention

This approach blurs the line between peace and conflict.

3. U.S. Strategic Ambiguity Under Strain
Under the Taiwan Relations Act, the United States supplies defensive weapons but offers no formal security guarantee.

However, in 2025 Washington approved $11.1 billion in advanced weapons, including:

• Long-range rocket systems

• Missile platforms

• Unmanned aerial vehicles

Beijing condemned the move as destabilizing, while Taipei welcomed it as vital for deterrence.

4. Risks of Strategic Clarity
Some analysts argue for explicit defense guarantees. Others warn that formal clarity could:

• Trigger pre-emptive action by Beijing

• Accelerate regional militarization

• Lock Washington into automatic escalation

Why It Matters

Taiwan is not only a security issue — it is a global economic linchpin.

• Over 60% of global semiconductor production is based in Taiwan.

• More than 90% of advanced sub-7nm chips are manufactured on the island.

A conflict in the Taiwan Strait would disrupt:

• Global supply chains

• Technology production

• Defense systems

• Automotive and AI industries

The economic fallout would be immediate and worldwide.

This is not just cross-strait tension — it’s the stability of the global semiconductor backbone.

Why It Matters to Foreign Currency Holders

Geopolitical escalation in the Taiwan Strait could trigger:

• Safe-haven currency flows

• Volatility in energy and shipping markets

• Shockwaves through technology equities

• Supply-chain-driven inflation spikes

Capital markets are tightly linked to semiconductor stability — and Taiwan is at the center.

Implications for the Global Reset

• Pillar 1: Deterrence Redesign

Traditional ambiguity is eroding under sustained military pressure. A recalibrated approach must balance deterrence with escalation control.

• Pillar 2: Supply Chain Sovereignty

The semiconductor concentration in Taiwan underscores the fragility of global manufacturing networks. Nations are accelerating reshoring and diversification strategies.

Taiwan’s status now influences both military doctrine and economic architecture.

Seeds of Wisdom Team View

Strategic ambiguity once preserved peace by fostering uncertainty.

Today, persistent gray-zone operations are testing its limits.

Full strategic clarity risks escalation.
Pure ambiguity risks miscalculation.

The path forward appears to be calibrated ambiguity — political restraint paired with credible deterrent capability.

The stakes extend beyond sovereignty. They encompass:

• Global technology supply chains

• Military balance in the Indo-Pacific

• Financial system stability

This is not just regional rivalry — it’s the fault line between economic interdependence and military confrontation.

Seeds of Wisdom Team
Newshounds News™ Exclusive

Sources

• Modern Diplomacy — "Taiwan at a Crossroads: Why Strategic Ambiguity Needs Recalibration"

• Reuters — "U.S. approves new arms package for Taiwan amid rising tensions"

~~~~~~~~~~

Seeds of Wisdom Team RV Currency Facts Youtube and Rumble

Newshound's News Telegram Room Link

RV Facts with Proof Links Link

RV Updates Proof links - Facts Link

Follow the Gold/Silver Rate COMEX

Follow Fast Facts

Seeds of Wisdom Team™ Website

Thank you Dinar Recaps