No Such Thing as Enough Money

No Such Thing as Enough Money

Jacob Schroeder   Oct 27, 2021

How much money is enough?

It’s a philosophical money question that often arises out of discontent. We see someone of substantial means, like a celebrity, live a troubled life. Or, we ourselves experience great fortune yet feel unhappy.

It makes us wonder where the finish line is, the point when you can stop striving for more and settle into a life of satisfaction.

There are some great financial blogs that provide good answers, such as here and here. And then there are a variety of books that tackle this question in their own ways: Ego Is the Enemy, The Last Lecture, the Bible, to name a few.

Another book that resonates with me, perhaps because of its instructive format, is How Will You Measure Your Life? by the late Clayton Christensen.

He comes to the startling realization:

“I had thought the destination was what was important, but it turned out it was the journey.”

That to me is the answer to the question. Though it is, in a way, a non-answer. As with many of life’s mysteries, there is no definitive conclusion.

There is never enough money.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t mean that you can always use more money to achieve a perfect life. Rather, I mean the exact opposite.

No amount of money will insulate you from suffering.

This week Elon Musk’s wealth jumped by $36 billion in a single day, bringing his net worth close to $300 billion. Yet, even he has experienced some very public setbacks, including the tragedy of losing his first child.

“The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned; but time and chance happen to them all.” (Eccles. 9:11)

There is no such thing as enough money, as there is no destination of absolute happiness. It’s all about simply having the capacity to notice the truly joyful things along the journey.

Pay attention to the wrong things, and life starts to feel empty. As Christensen writes:

“In your life, there are going to be constant demands for your time and attention. How are you going to decide which of those demands gets resources? The trap many people fall into is to allocate their time to whoever screams loudest, and their talent to whatever offers them the fastest reward.”

His solution is to focus on what provides lasting happiness:

“Intimate, loving, and enduring relationships with our family and close friends will be among the sources of the deepest joy in our lives.”

I am writing this because yesterday we had to say good-bye to a special member of our family. Our dog Sunny, who I referenced in this previous blog, developed a severe case of intervertebral disc disease. We woke one morning to find her acting strange, and within 48 hours she was paralyzed. With a heavy sigh, the neurologist gave us the bad news that her chances of any type of recovery were minimal. At best, she would need consistent pain management. That was no way for her to live.

I am extremely grateful for the gift of having her in my life.

In the afternoon, my wife took Sunny for her last walk. We gently set her in the kids’ red wagon. Then she pulled her around the neighborhood, taking her one last time around her favorite trees and brightly colored fire hydrants. The late October sky was unseasonably warm and clear. The white sun brightened Sunny’s golden fur.

When my wife and Sunny came back around the corner, I felt as rich as possible -- to have known Sunny, to have such a caring and loving partner, to have a tragic day made picture perfect in so many ways.

That’s enough.

There is never enough money, if you can’t see the riches in front of you now.

The question shouldn’t be: how much money is enough? It should be: how much more clarity do you need to see the rich, joyful things happening all around you?

https://rootofall.substack.com/p/no-such-thing-as-enough-money

The Relationship Between Money and Marriage

The Relationship Between Money and Marriage

Jacob Schroeder  Oct 12, 2021

I love scotch; she hates it.

There are many things my wife and I don't agree on, but money isn't one of them. We are intentional spenders, buying only what mutually aligns with our needs or values. For instance, disinterested in paying for the trappings of an ostentatious wedding, we tied the knot at New York's City Hall; our reception was watching our first son play at a public playground in the East Village on a warm fall afternoon.

We've been happily together for 16 years, which makes me wonder: Does love make the financial side of marriage work, or is it the other way around?

The most important decision you'll ever make

Warren Buffett's financial wealth is only rivaled by his wealth of wisdom. Rarely does a day pass without someone in the finance industry quoting the Oracle of Omaha on social media. Heck, Warren Buffett's influence is so great, people have essentially made careers out of quoting him.

Yet, with all of his knowledge on investing and business, he says the most important decision a person can make has nothing to do with investing and business. At the 2009 Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, he said:

“Marry the right person. I’m serious about that. It will make more difference in your life. It will change your aspirations, all kinds of things.”

You don't make it to Buffett's level of stature with a track record of being wrong often, and researchers seem to agree with him on this point. Studies show that marrying the right person can significantly improve our health, career success and wealth.

Marriage will change you in many ways. By definition, marriage -- joining two into one -- is disruptive. Often, for the better. It is about pursuing new things while sacrificing others. A major contributor to that disruption though is money.

Although we've long moved on from the ancient practice of marrying for the sake of status, money is an irrevocable part of marriage, at times, for better, and at times, for worse. Here is what research has uncovered about the relationship between money and marriage.

The relationship between money and marriage

Married people are wealthier than single people.

A 2005 study tracking people in their 20s, 30s and 40s found that married people experienced a 77% increase in wealth over single people. In fact, married individuals in the study saw their wealth rise 16% for each year of marriage. This makes sense considering married couples can combine incomes and share expenses.

However, it may not tell the whole story. You can't expect to tie the knot and just start watching the money roll right in. More affluent people are more likelier to get married in the first place. A report by the American Enterprise Institute details the wide gap in marriage rates by income. About a quarter of “poor” adults aged 18 to 55 are currently married, compared to 56% of middle- and upper-class adults.

Wealthier couples are happier.

A study published in the Journal of Happiness Studies suggests that married individuals are generally happier than the unmarried.

What about happiness among married couples?

Turns out, money is one of the biggest contributors to marital happiness. That's what University of Maryland sociology professor Philip Cohen found after analyzing data from the General Social Survey, a long-running study of Americans’ views and behaviors.

The survey shows a class divide when it comes to marital happiness. Of upper-class married couples, 70% said they are "very happy" while only 53% of lower-income couples could say the same.

TO READ MORE: https://rootofall.substack.com/p/the-relationship-between-money-and-marriage

Europe Just Bragged About Losing to Gold

Europe Just Bragged About Losing to Gold

Notes From the Field By James Hickman (Simon Black / Sovereign Man) June 4, 2026

When the euro launched on January 1, 1999, it was sold as the future. It would be a single currency to knit Europe together — to wipe out the exchange-rate friction between member states, complete the continent's single market, and bind a dozen squabbling nations into one economic bloc with one money.

And in the grander ambitions of its architects, it was meant to do something more: to grow up into a true global currency, the first serious rival the US dollar had faced since World War II.

Last week, the European Central Bank published its 2025 report card, with ECB President Christine Lagarde celebrating “an opening for the euro to enhance its global appeal.”

The report bragged that the euro remains the second most used currency in the world, as well as the second most held in reserve, behind only the dollar.

The key word is “currency.”

Because in reality, 2025 was the year that gold took the top spot, making up 27% of global reserves held by governments and central banks. That pushed US Treasuries into second place with 22%, and the euro into third, making up 15% of global reserves.

A metal that pays no interest and earns no yield is now the biggest slice of global reserves, up from just 20% a year earlier.

The world is, in fact, trying to diversify away from the dollar. Central banks have spent years quietly trimming their dollar exposure, looking for somewhere safer to park their national savings.

But they are not choosing euros.

Then why, the ECB may counter, was 2025 a record year for international borrowing in euros?

Because there is more debt in everything than ever — global debt keeps smashing new highs, so a record pile of euro IOUs is less an achievement than a symptom of the times.

But to give credit where it's due, the euro is genuinely in first place in one market, according to Lagarde: "The euro became the leading currency in the green and sustainable international bond market."

That's the debt Europe sells to bankroll the very net-zero crusade that gutted its own economy. So the euro's crowning achievement of 2025 was becoming the world champion at borrowing money to make itself poorer.

If you ever needed one sentence to explain why nobody wants this currency, there it is.

Because leading the world in the things that make you poorer is the entire European model. Across the continent, governments spent two decades waging war on their own cheap energy in the name of net zero — turning their backs on nuclear power that supplied a third of Europe's electricity in 1990 and barely 15% today.

They saddled themselves with some of the highest power prices in the developed world and watched their industry pack up and leave. They threw open their borders, then aimed their police and courts at the citizens who objected.

The result is a continent so hollowed out that Mississippi, the poorest state in America, now produces more wealth per person than France or Italy.

But sure, this is the euro’s moment...

Meanwhile, central banks added roughly 850 tonnes of physical gold in 2025, a slight step down from the record-shattering pace of the prior two years, but bought at the highest prices in human history.

Poland led the gold-buying pack last year, followed by China, Turkey, and India.

But for a stretch of 2025, the single biggest gold buyer on the planet wasn't a country at all — it was Tether, the company behind the world's biggest dollar-backed stablecoin.

In the third quarter alone it bought more gold than any central bank on earth, and by the end of January it was sitting on roughly 148 tonnes — nearly 4.8 million ounces, worth about $22 billion — enough to rank among the top 30 gold holders in the world, ahead of the likes of Australia and South Korea.

This is exactly why the gold story is far from over.

The extra gold central banks have bought since 2022 laid the foundation for a price that has nearly tripled since — yet even that represents only a modest reallocation out of US dollars.

So what happens when they move even another 5% of their $10 trillion in reserves into gold?

With no single currency able to replace the dollar, and the reasons to diversify only growing, gold looks set to keep climbing as the world's largest reserve asset.


To your freedom,   James Hickman   Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign LLC

 P.S. Everyone from central banks to a stablecoin giant is racing into gold — which is why it's trading near record highs. We think owning the companies that produce it beats buying bullion at the top.

That's the whole idea behind Strategic Assets, Schiff Sovereign's monthly investment research. We hunt for profitable real-asset businesses with clean balance sheets, real catalysts, and a low multiple of free cash flow.

And it's working. We've seen it multiply the value of several precious metals companies, with others still in the buy range today. The same setup is now lining up well beyond the metals — in energy and other real assets — as nations around the world scramble to secure the critical resources a fragmenting world runs on.

https://www.schiffsovereign.com/investing/europe-just-bragged-about-losing-to-gold-155272/?inf_contact_key=f4fc58584d0d0a2b32c5ea1a500c07c21f2ce51ec8bc6ace203deddd90c8fcdf

This Is A Key Sign You Have An Unhealthy Relationship With Money

Experts Say This Is A Key Sign You Have An Unhealthy Relationship With Money

By Natalia Lusinski  

When it comes to money and budgeting, it’s often easier said than done. You may have the best of intentions — you’ll eat out less this month and put the money into your savings account instead. But then life happens. Just like working through any other life, fitness, or wellness issue, a little introspection is often the ticket. If you want to get your finances back in order, a financial psychologist or money mindset coach can help. It all starts with getting your head in the right place.

“Whenever things are in order, it brings us a sense of peace,” Severine Bryan, DBA, financial empowerment educator and coach, and founder of Sev Talks Money, tells TZR in an email.

“Having our finances in order doesn't necessarily mean we are debt-free, but it allows us to have a clear picture of where we are at. It is very important to know what is coming in and what is going out so we are not flying blind.”

She says she likes to think of organizing finances like taking a trip to New York City. “I can leave Georgia and end up in California if I don't know the details of the trip and if I don’t put specific plans in place,” she explains. “When I have a plan, I will go directly to NYC. And even if I take a detour, I will know how to get back on track to get there.” Ahead, Bryan and two other financial coaches explain how they help clients get back on track — and why it’s never too late to do so.

What A Financial Coach Does

Whether you consult a financial psychologist, money mindset coach, or similar type of financial expert, they all do variations of the same thing — help you figure out your relationship to money and how your past (upbringing) affects your present spending and saving habits.

“Part of what we're doing in financial therapy is to be able to really look with clarity at our circumstances — and how those circumstances change from moment to moment,” Financial Therapist Amanda Clayman tells TZR. She aims to help clients learn how to use certain strategies to get a money routine or practice in place.

Bryan adds that a financial coach can also help clients set financial goals, create a plan to achieve those goals, and provide accountability to help them follow the plan. “We also help the client dig deep to find what motivates them to achieve certain goals,” she explains.

“Because, many times, the goal is not money, but the things that money provides, such as freedom to make choices.” This can mean anything from wanting to eat out to buying a particular car or taking a certain vacation. “I think of a financial coach similarly to a football coach,” she adds. “The football coach gives the plays during training, but on game day, the quarterback is the one that has to make the calls.”

Finances can be a very difficult topic to discuss, Taryn Bushrod, money mindset coach and founder of Taryn’s World, tells TZR in an email. “Doing so exposes people’s vulnerabilities, and that can be extremely uncomfortable,” she says. “The first thing I do with a new client is build a relationship, so they are comfortable enough to start sharing pertinent information I need in order to help them start seeing results.” She then focuses on behavioral factors that impact spending.

“In doing so, you can identify the root cause of your actions and redirect your spending habits, which, in turn, could result in redirecting your funds.”

 TO READ MORE:‍ ‍https://www.thezoereport.com/wellness/relationship-with-money?fbclid=IwAR3SsiSiZ3gONSAjnuc_z8XSUXZE38MbQa4LOpH8FAdojaC1Y4I4oj3neZY

Green Policy is Deadlier Than Guns

Green Policy is Deadlier Than Guns

Notes From the Field By James Hickman (Simon Black / Sovereign Man May 29, 2026

Every year around this time, a silent killer sneaks its way onto European shores and slaughters people by the tens of thousands.  Last year, it killed more people in just three months than the number of civilians killed in the war in Ukraine all year. It killed three times as many people as traffic accidents do.  And it killed FOUR times more Europeans than gun violence killed in America.  I'm not talking about COVID. Or even the legions of migrants invading the continent. 

 This deadly scourge that kills tens of thousands of Europeans each year is the lack of air conditioning.

Heat killed 62,775 people across the continent in the summer of 2024, according to a study in Nature Medicine.

The World Health Organization calls it the leading "climate-related" cause of death in the region.

But in reality, these deaths are directly related to the fanatical green environmental policies of European governments, which have made the electricity to run air conditioning prohibitively expensive.

Roughly 19% of European homes have A/C, versus 90% in the US.

The simple reason is the bill: electricity in Germany costs about 2.5 times what it does in the US. Starting in 2011, Germany shut down every one of its nuclear reactors and bet its grid on wind and solar — in a country where the sun barely shines.

European media and politicians have also spent a generation making anyone who even thinks about buying A/C feel like a moral failure. 

The result is a continent that has made cooling both unaffordable and shameful; then they act surprised when 60,000 people die in a heat wave.

The dead are not the only price paid. For decades, German manufacturing thrived because one machine could produce more than a thousand workers in the developing world.

But Germany's high-tech manufacturing model only worked because the electricity to run those machines was reliable and affordable.  But the German government has spent twenty years making energy either too expensive or, on certain days, simply unavailable.

Germany used to have inexpensive electricity thanks to its nuclear reactors. But the green fanatics have succeeded in shutting those reactors down, resulting in higher electric prices.

The bill for that policy lands on the factory floor. The German Association of the Automotive Industry reported on May 13, 2026 that German automakers have already shed 100,000 jobs since 2019, with another 125,000 projected to disappear by 2035.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has called the nuclear phase-out "a mistake," and said "I regret this." Yet in the same breath he explained that "it is the way it is, and we are now concentrating on the energy policy we have."

In other words, they acknowledge that they made a huge mistake. But they also admit that they aren't going to fix it.

Perversely, the simple act of admitting a mistake (even without fixing it) is actually progress for a politician.

Just look at their immigration policy— they won’t even admit the mistake of importing legions of gang-raping foreigners who do not respect laws and have no problem committing violence.

The bill for that policy has come due in the same way the energy bill came due: in bodies.

In August 2024, Solingen's Festival of Diversity got a firsthand demonstration of what they were celebrating when a Syrian asylum seeker stabbed three people to death.

Four months later, a Saudi national drove a rented SUV through Magdeburg's Christmas market, killing six and injuring 200.

In January 2025, an Afghan asylum seeker— already under an active deportation order German authorities had failed to enforce— stabbed a two-year-old boy and a 41-year-old man to death in a public park in Aschaffenburg.

By November 2025, German cities had begun canceling their Christmas markets outright. One reopened after spending more than €250,000 on concrete barriers to keep trucks from being driven into shoppers a second time.

The state's response to imported violence is not to stop importing it. It is to cancel Christmas.

The pattern is always the same: even when governments make an enormous mistake,  they lean into it. They rarely fix anything, they just continue with a destructive policy. 

And anyone who actually does try to fix it gets ridiculed, canceled, or shot.

One current example from the US is the LA mayoral election.

The incumbent mayor, Karen Bass, has presided over the worst destruction the city has seen in decades. She does nothing about the homeless problem— in fact recently stated that taxpayers should pay for new teeth for homeless meth addicts so that they can have dignity.

Her only positive contribution, in her own words, is that she was “out of the country” when the Palisades wild fires started in January 2025 and that she did “not start the fires” herself. That’s a pretty low bar for success.

Her opponent, Spencer Pratt, just wants to fix the city. He presents real solutions to real problems, yet he is the one that the media paints as a fringe lunatic— not the lady who wants to give taxpayer-funded teeth to meth addicts.

Politicians do not just refuse to fix their mistakes; they save their loudest contempt for whoever is rude enough to mention them, or daring enough to fix them.

There may still be a way forward here. Maybe more responsible, more sensible people start running... and maybe voters will be responsible and sensible enough to elect them. Maybe this happens before it’s too late, and America can finally turn things around.

But there’s also a rational possibility that doesn’t happen... and that’s why it’s worth having a Plan B.

To your freedom,   James Hickman   Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign

 PS—  Having a Plan B is not hysteria. It’s not unpatriotic. It’s a rational common-sense move to mitigate obvious risks.

The fact is that we have much more control over our circumstances than the ‘experts’ would have us believe. It is possible to get inflation’s impact on your life under control. To reduce your current and future tax bill. To reduce the risk of future social chaos. To set your family up for long-term success.

These are all sensible precautions and part of a smart Plan B strategy; we have been providing these solutions for years, and invite you to learn more about our research.

https://www.schiffsovereign.com/trends/green-policy-is-deadlier-than-guns-155218/?inf_contact_key=06e7b2f043e4e1147395f6fd794ae40f2294a318289bad97137125bd69e8bd38

4 Bad Habits That Could Affect Your Money More Than Tariffs and Inflation

4 Bad Habits That Could Affect Your Money More Than Tariffs and Inflation

Written by  Chris Adam  GoBankingRates

The Trump administration’s discussions about tariffs and inflation have led many consumers to question how well they’re prepared for the future regarding their finances. After all, some experts have raised concerns that tariffs could lead to higher prices on products and services people use each day.

But there may be a way to protect personal finances that has little to do with moves by the White House.

GOBankingRates spoke with financial experts about some common bad habits that could affect your money more than tariffs or inflation.

Failing To Save and Invest Early

Bill Lyons, CEO of Griffin Funding, said one harmful habit is failing to save and invest early. 

“Without a consistent savings plan, you’re missing out on the power of compound interest, which significantly grows wealth over time,” said Lyons. “Procrastinating on building an emergency fund or not setting aside money for retirement can also derail your financial security.”

Lyons said these habits are harmful because they limit your ability to cope with unexpected expenses and capitalize on long-term financial growth. To avoid this, develop a realistic budget that aligns with your income, prioritize savings and commit to setting aside money regularly, whether for emergencies, investments or retirement. 

Increasing Spending as Income Grows

According to Brian Chasin, investing expert and chief financial officer at SOBA New Jersey, one of the most harmful habits is lifestyle inflation, increasing your spending as your income grows. While earning more should improve financial security, Chasin said, many people raise their standard of living instead of saving or investing the difference. 

“This leads to missed wealth-building opportunities and greater vulnerability during economic downturns,” according to Chasin. “The fix is to establish a disciplined savings plan where a set percentage of any income increase is automatically directed toward long-term goals before adjusting discretionary spending.”

TO READ More:    https://www.gobankingrates.com/money/economy/bad-habits-that-could-affect-your-money-more-than-tariffs-and-inflation/

Expert Issues Warning Over US Bank Accounts Sitting Idle

Expert Issues Warning Over US Bank Accounts Sitting Idle

Rudro Chakrabarti  Mon, April 20, 2026

Money Can Now Be Turned Over To State.  Secure your money ASAP

Katelyn Fugate thought she was doing something nice for her young son. A few years back, she opened a savings account for him — a small starter fund he could build on one day. Recently, she decided to check in on it.

The balance was zero. Fugate told Scripps News she went to check the balance hoping to start adding to it again. Instead, she found the account empty. (1) The bank had declared it dormant after five years of inactivity, closed it and shipped the money off to the state's unclaimed funds department. Worse, when Fugate went looking for it, she couldn't find the money at the bank or the state.

"It's definitely not at the bank; they've turned it over. I can't find it on the missing funds [website] as of yet," she said.

How Dormant Accounts Get Swept Up By The State

The process is called escheatment, and it's the law in all 50 states. (2) When an account goes long enough without customer-initiated activity, the bank is required by state law to hand the balance over to the state treasurer's office as unclaimed property.

How long is "long enough" varies. Most states set the dormancy period at three to five years for bank accounts — and the trend has been toward shorter windows. Over a recent 16-year stretch, 17 jurisdictions cut their dormancy periods for bank properties to three years, down from five or seven. (3)

Automatic activity doesn't reset the clock. Auto-deposits and interest postings don't qualify as customer-initiated activity (4) — only a deposit, withdrawal or transfer you personally make resets it.

Before the money leaves, banks are required to attempt to contact you — typically by mail to your last known address. If the letter goes somewhere outdated or gets tossed as junk, escheatment continues without you. In some cases, the bank may simply mail a check for the remaining balance — little help if that check lands at an old address.

The Fees Hit Before The State Does

Ted Rossman, a principal analyst at Bankrate, told Scripps News that some banks flag inactivity after as little as six months  he said. "Sometimes the threshold is a bit longer."

Inactivity fees typically run $5 to $20 per month. For a small account — say, a few hundred dollars set aside for a child — those fees can wipe the balance out entirely before the state ever sees a dime.

There's a secondary cost most people overlook: once a bank closes a dormant account, any scheduled transactions tied to it fail, which can trigger late fees or missed income depending on what was running through it. And under Regulation DD, banks must continue paying interest on dormant interest-bearing accounts (5) — but if the monthly dormancy fee exceeds the interest earned, the balance still shrinks.

There's A Lot Of Forgotten Money Out There

Roughly $70 billion in unclaimed property is sitting in state coffers, waiting for rightful owners to come claim it — money from forgotten bank accounts, uncashed checks, safe deposit boxes and old brokerage holdings. About one in seven Americans has some of it. In fiscal year 2024, states returned $4.49 billion to owners (6) — a fraction of what they're holding.

California alone holds more than $15 billion in unclaimed property and has returned roughly 3.5% of it, according to a recent CBS News investigation. (7) The scrutiny has now reached Washington: a bipartisan bill called the SAFER Act, introduced this month by Reps. Sam Liccardo and Mike Lawler, would limit when states can take custody of securities, digital assets and investment accounts under unclaimed property laws.

Most states place no statute of limitations on claiming escheated funds, meaning owners can demand their money back at any time. The reclamation process varies by state, though — and some are notoriously slow, as Fugate is discovering firsthand.

How To Keep Your Accounts Out Of The State's Hands

Rossman's fix: keep the account moving, even a little.

Read More: https://moneywise.com/news/top-stories/us-bank-accounts-idle-money-state-seizure

There Is No "Fair Share" — There Is Only “More”

There Is No "Fair Share" — There Is Only “More”

Notes From the Field By James Hickman (Simon Black / Sovereign Man)  April 16, 2026

In April 1971, Keith Richards loaded his family and his Bentley onto a cross-Channel ferry and drove south until he hit the Mediterranean. He rented a 19th-century villa called Nellcôte on a hillside above Villefranche-sur-Mer, and converted the basement into a recording studio.

Over the following year the rest of the Rolling Stones rotated through the house and nearby properties to record the double album that became Exile on Main St., while staying deliberately out of reach of the British tax authorities.

The top marginal income tax rate in Britain at the time was 75%, and a surcharge on the highest earners pushed the effective rate on the wealthiest past 90%.

Three years later, under Denis Healey's 1974 budget, the top rate on earned income would climb to 83% and the rate on investment income would reach 98%.

Britain would spend the rest of the decade watching capital flee and begging the IMF for emergency loans.

David Bowie, Rod Stewart, Michael Caine, Sean Connery, and a long line of less famous wealthy Britons eventually ran the same arithmetic as the Stones and reached a similar conclusion. Capital left the country in every form it could fit into, including bonds, businesses, luxury cars, and rock stars.

But politicians never learn.

Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey has backed legislation that would push the top federal income-tax rate to 43%.

Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland is pushing a version that lands at 49%.

Both men describe it, as they always do, as wealthy Americans finally paying their "fair share." 

What exact percent is their fair share? Are we to believe they will be satisfied at 43% or 49%?

As always, that phrase is deliberately left undefined.

Never-mind that the top 1% of filers already paid 40.4% of all federal income taxes in 2022 while the bottom 50% paid roughly 3%.

They are also conveniently ignorant of the fact that raising the top marginal rate doesn’t actually raise revenue at all.

Since the end of the Second World War, U.S. federal tax revenue has averaged around 17% to 18% of GDP, dipping toward 15% in deep recessions and climbing near 20% in booms. The swings track the business cycle, not tax policy.

The top marginal rate, over that same stretch, has been all over the map: 91% under Eisenhower, 28% under Reagan by 1988, 39.6% under Clinton, 37% today. Yet regardless of whether tax rates were 91% or 37%, the IRS always collects around 17% of GDP.

The conclusion is obvious: if the government wants to collect more tax revenue, they should focus on setting the right conditions for an economic boom. In short, make the pie bigger for EVERYONE, and hence the government’s slice will grow as well.

Making the pie bigger isn’t that hard, either. America’s private economy is legendary. All Congress has to do is get out of the way. Attempt to run a balanced budget. Restore credibility. Make it easier for businesses and individuals to be productive. REMOVE idiotic laws instead of creating new ones.

But they’re not interested in any of those things.

Congress has documented evidence of hundreds of billions of dollars in fraud. Yet they  do nothing. They have also pledged to do nothing about Social Security— which is set to run out of money in six years.

The regulatory code in the Land of the Free already runs over 188,000 pages. Yet they expand it every session.

This is the opposite of what they should be doing. And instead of figuring out how to live within their means, they just demand more resources... even though it never works.

Britain tried its 98% tax experiment in the 1970s and spent a decade regretting it.

Ironically the current Labour government has forgotten that painful lesson; they recently abolished the 110-year-old "non-dom" regime, and more than 10,000 millionaires have already left the country.

In the United States, Elizabeth Warren's Ultra-Millionaire Tax proposal does not just impose a wealth tax. It bundles her wealth tax with an additional 40% exit tax on anyone who renounces US citizenship.

You do not create a 40% tollbooth at the border unless you fully expect people to try to walk through it.

These are not serious ideas to grow an economy. Rather, they are insidious policies designed to trap people in a system which steals their prosperity.

That is why a Plan B makes so much sense.

To your freedom,  James Hickman   Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign LLC

https://www.schiffsovereign.com/trends/there-is-no-fair-share-there-is-only-more-155021/?inf_contact_key=777b6710cfd255750dd3426953caeee29ee4b048ce23149d13a848abfdc3679b  

The $13,000 Apartments the Government Won't Let You Buy

The $13,000 Apartments the Government Won't Let You Buy

Notes From the Field By James Hickman (Simon Black/Sovereign Man)  April 14, 2026

On May 20, 1862, Abraham Lincoln signed the Homestead Act into law, and it essentially said: here's 160 acres of land. It's yours. For free. All you have to do is live on it and improve it.  And between 1862 and 1934, the federal government distributed 270 million acres under the program — roughly 10% of all the land in the United States.

Even as far back as the American Revolution, the Founding Fathers understood that property ownership made people more engaged, more productive citizens. Ownership meant that you had a vested financial interest in your community... and your country.

Over time, that idea fused with the concept of "the American Dream". And for decades that dream was a reality for millions of people.

After World War II, for example, America underwent a massive construction boom. Between  postwar prosperity, the GI Bill, and the arrival of the modern 30-year fixed mortgage,  home ownership surged from about 44% in 1940 to 62% by 1960.

More importantly, housing was affordable.

In 1950, median family income was about $3,000, yet the median home cost roughly $7,350. That’s just ~2.5 times median household income. Plus, with prevailing mortgage rates back then 4.5%, the monthly payments were trivial.

Because of that, families across America could easily make ends meet on a single income.

Today the median home sells for about $412,000. Median household income is roughly $83,700. That puts housing at 5x household income— double what it was in the 1950s.

More importantly, at today's mortgage rate of roughly 6.4%, the monthly payment on a median home (assuming a 20% down payment) consumes roughly 30% of household income.

The down payment is also so high these days that buying a home is nearly impossible, especially for young people or low-income workers. Even in dual-income households, homeownership is increasingly out of reach.

As we discussed on Friday, America’s housing problems go far beyond the ‘greedy’ Wall Street investors that are getting most of the blame for rising home prices.

Construction materials cost 40% more than they did five years ago, courtesy of the Federal Reserve printing trillions during the pandemic and igniting inflation.

Plus the regulatory permitting maze adds enormous costs. In Fremont, California, development fees alone run $157,000 per home before a single nail is hammered. And that doesn’t even include additional permitting costs and utility connection fees.

The government used to give away 160 acres for free. Now local governments charge six figures for permission to build.

Go figure that California, with its endless lip service about affordable housing, is also the epicenter of American homelessness.

But it turns out there's a ready-made solution staring policymakers in the face.

The office property market is a complete bloodbath right now. Between the sluggish economy, AI reducing demand for workers, and the lingering work-from-home paradigm, the prices of office properties across the country have tanked.

More than 200 distressed office buildings changed hands across the country in 2025, with average sale prices down 37% from 2019. In Manhattan, a 920,000-square-foot tower sold for $8.5 million, down from $332.5 million. That’s a 97% decline!

Then there’s 401 South State Street in Chicago, a 485,000-square-foot office building that sold last October for $4.2 million, down from $68.1 million in 2016. That’s less than $9 per square foot.

Housing in Chicago isn’t cheap. So just imagine you’re young, fresh out of college, and staring at the prospect of paying $1,200 per month to live in a cramped apartment with three roommates.

Instead, you could pay about $13,000 for 1,500 square feet worth of space in the 401 South State Street office building that would be yours to own.

Yes, duh, it’s an office building. So it wouldn’t have the conveniences of a traditional home— like private bathrooms and kitchens. But for $13 grand?!!? Who cares. You'd have your own private space, a roof over your head, and a door that locks.

Frankly, that's not so different from military barracks and university dorms. Americans manage just fine with communal facilities when the price is right.

That's the beauty of capitalism. Such living accommodations aren’t for everyone. But at a low enough price, a LOT of people would happily trade convenience for affordability. Shower at the gym. Eat at the fast-casual spot around the corner. Live with walking distance to work downtown.

Most 20-somethings might think that’s pretty cool— especially compared to the alternative of paying out the nose for rent and never managing to save enough money to buy a house.

Same logic for a family of six crammed into a two-bedroom public housing unit in decrepit conditions; they could have a few thousand square feet to themselves.

Here’s another scenario. Let’s say a family in Topeka, Kansas locked in a 2% mortgage during the pandemic. Dad got laid off and can't find another job locally. But they don’t want to sell the house to move across country, uproot the kids, and buy a new house somewhere else at a 6% rate. So they're stuck.

Instead, Dad buys 1,000 square feet in one of these bankrupt office buildings for less than $10k. His family stays home, he commutes to his new job in a new city, and flies home on the weekends to see his kids. They make it work... which they wouldn’t be able to afford with hotels or an AirBnb.

This would be a genuine ‘starter home’— a place where someone could actually save money and build toward a proper mortgage, instead of hemorrhaging rent to Blackrock every month while still falling behind.

But the government won't allow it.

Zoning codes, building regulations, occupancy requirements— a labyrinth of rules that forbid you from such options.

Let grown adults decide for themselves. That's how capitalism is supposed to work.

Nobody would pay $400,000 for a unit with no bathroom. But $13,000? For a lot of Americans, that's not a sacrifice— it's an opportunity.

The same politicians who claim to care about the poor, the homeless, and young people priced out of the American Dream have the obvious solution sitting right in front of them.

But they won't take it, because that would mean getting out of the way.

To your freedom,   James Hickman   Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign LLC 

PS — Another way to opt out of America's housing affordability disaster is to look elsewhere.

There are plenty of countries where you can buy a beautiful home in a major city for a fraction of what a starter unit costs in the US, and several of those purchases also qualify you for residency or eventual citizenship. So you're not just buying a home, you're buying optionality. We cover the best programs, exact thresholds, and on-the-ground intelligence in Plan B Confidential

https://www.schiffsovereign.com/trends/the-13000-apartments-the-government-wont-let-you-buy-155002/?inf_contact_key=be1b45181a64d92a5aa6bded0feed2af75c74c6d80b7c7d7ab87b128387eaee0

Central Banks Are Hoarding Gold. Governments are Starting to Hoard People.

Central Banks Are Hoarding Gold. Governments are Starting to Hoard People.

Notes From the Field By James Hickman (Simon Black / Sovereign Man   April 13, 2026

A few months sago, the German government quietly passed a law requiring men between the ages of 17 and 45 to obtain permission before leaving the country for more than three months.  It wasn't announced in a press conference. It wasn't debated on the front page of any newspaper. It was buried in a routine update to the country's military service law, tucked in alongside provisions about registration systems and NATO readiness targets.

Nobody noticed for months— until a local newspaper flagged it last week.

The defense ministry is currently "drafting specific regulations for granting exemptions from the requirement for approval."

Translation: the law is already on the books, and they'll tell you what it means later.

But don’t worry— a defense ministry spokesperson stressed that military service remains "voluntary."

Germany isn't at war. This isn't martial law. It’s preparing for a changing world. And they’re not alone.

The US is also making its own updates. Starting in December, eligible men will automatically be registered for the military draft. Instead of relying on 18-year olds to fill out Selective Service forms on their own, the government will simply pull from federal databases and register on your behalf. 

Congress also appears to be working on making it harder for Americans to take their money and leave.

On March 26, Senator Elizabeth Warren reintroduced the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act, backed by more than 45 lawmakers. The bill proposes a 2% annual tax on net worth above $50 million, an additional 1% surtax on billionaires, and a 40% exit tax on wealthy Americans who try to renounce their citizenship to escape it.

It also includes aggressive new enforcement provisions: third-party reporting on hard-to-value assets, formulaic IRS valuation rules for private businesses and real estate, and a 30% minimum audit rate on everyone the bill covers.

The most productive people in America will be forced to waste countless hours on compliance, instead of working to create prosperity.

That isn't just a tax. It's a framework for tracking private wealth— and penalizing anyone who tries to opt out and take it somewhere else.

Governments don't build this kind of infrastructure unless they think they might use it. Germany is making sure it can stop fighting-age men from leaving. The United States is making sure it is ready to press people into service.

And it is building a stronger fence around the most productive tax cattle so it can milk them for all they’re worth.

Governments are clearly planning for a period of conflict.

One other sign is that they are securing physical, real asset reserves.

For the last two years, the world's central banks have been buying physical gold faster than at any point in modern history.

At the same time, they have been quietly selling US Treasuries. And the old dynamic has inverted: the kinds of global shocks that used to send investors stampeding into Treasuries as the world's safe haven are now sending them the other way.

Take the Iran war as an example: normally when there’s a major conflict, foreign countries BUY lots of US government bonds as a safe haven. But since late February, foreign central banks have SOLD over $80 billion worth of US Treasury securities.

This reduction in foreign demand for US government bonds is also a key reason why interest rates have risen— from 3.97% before the war started, to 4.33% today.

But this isn’t a sudden change of heart. Foreign governments and central banks have been losing faith in the US for years.

For decades after World War II, countries around the world relied on an America-dominated framework regarding trade, capital, and energy.

This postwar system required trust in the United States, trust that the rules would be stable, and trust that agreements would be honored.

But that trust is vanishing quickly.

The humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan. Routine weaponization of the US dollar for political goals. Budget deficits spiraling and a $39 trillion national debt. A government that shuts down every time it tries to pass a budget. 

From a foreign government official's perspective, physical gold sitting in a vault is a much safer bet than loaning money to the US Treasury.

Near-record gold prices and surging interest rates in the Treasury market are the surest signs yet that the postwar era of seamless global cooperation is unwinding... and inverting.

In a cooperative world, foreign nations are willing to depend on others. In a fragmented, conflict-prone world, governments secure resources. They secure their supply chains. They secure their energy. They secure their financial reserves.

And eventually... inevitably... they secure their people — the livestock can't be allowed to wander off the farm before it's time to milk them for taxes or march them off to war.

For now, capital can still flow somewhat freely. You can still apply for legal residency in another country. You can still hold gold overseas in a stable, neutral jurisdiction.

The window is still open to create a Plan B so you can have the options to come at whatever happens from a position of strength.  And if you’re not sure how to get started, I would really encourage you to check out our publication Plan B Confidential. 

To your freedom,  James Hickman   Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign LLC

https://www.schiffsovereign.com/trends/central-banks-are-hoarding-gold-governments-are-starting-to-hoard-people-154995/?inf_contact_key=e56cd40486775f074fe074f27c7c57e0837ca8eedd5950759fe76410ed6224c9

Ray Dalio says economic world order ‘is gone’ — warns of US ‘civil war.’ Preserve your wealth now

‘Let’s not be naive’: Ray Dalio says economic world order ‘is gone’ — warns of US ‘civil war.’ Preserve your wealth now

Jing Pan  Sun, April 12, 2026  Moneywise

In the wake of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, billionaire and founder of Bridgewater Associates, Ray Dalio, sounded a global fire alarm, and it’s starting to look like he was right.

The short version? The old economic world order is gone, and it’s likely not coming back any time soon.

“Let’s not be naive, ok, and say: Oh, we’re breaking the rule-based system,” Dalio said in an interview with Fortune at the WEF (1). “It’s gone. It’s going.”  Dalio was referring to the current global balance of power between nations, which has hinged on relatively predictable U.S. foreign policy.

However, since March 18, all eyes have turned to Iran.

Due to the war, the price of gas has risen about 80 cents per gallon, put down to the limited supply caused by the near-closure of the Strait of Hormuz (2). CNN reported in early April that in a speech to the press, the President threatened to bring Iran “back to the stone ages, where they belong (3)”.

This could indicate another lengthy conflict in the Middle East, but it’s only the latest in a series of echoing foreign policy maneuvers spanning the last year. For instance, in April 2025, the S&P 500 had one of the largest dips in its history, driven by U.S. “reciprocal” tariffs (4). The remainder of 2025 saw threats against Greenland’s sovereignty, regular verbal sparring over NATO targets and further shifts in the ongoing Ukrainian War.

Now, with gas at over $4 a gallon on average, many everyday Americans and Wall Street investors are worried about the economic impacts the new energy crisis has triggered.

Wars on multiple fronts could spell disaster

Essentially, wars suck up time and capital while eroding trust. Purchasing debt from a nation actively engaged in a war, for example, could be a bad bet, according to Dalio.

And this isn’t the first time Dalio has warned about a shaky grasp on the current global world order. In an interview in late 2025 on Leaders with Francine Lacqua (5), Dalio was confronted with a blunt question: “Could we be close to another world war?”

He didn’t hesitate. “We are in wars,” Dalio replied. “There is a financial money war, there's a technology war, there's geopolitical wars, and there are more military wars.”

Then came his more unsettling assessment: The U.S. itself isn’t immune.

“We have a civil war of some sort, which is developing in the United States and elsewhere, where there are irreconcilable differences,” Dalio said.

Here’s how things break down on the home front.

Mounting Division

Political opinion in America is sharply divided.

The American Survey Center reported as of 2025 that 71% of Republicans were at least somewhat satisfied with the current state of affairs in the country, and only 12% of Democrats said the same. In 2024, 17% of Republicans and 51% of Democrats were satisfied.

And yet, 61% of Americans across the political spectrum now report dissatisfaction with the current administration and state of the nation (6).

With this in mind, Dalio’s bleak outlook may be more realistic.

It’s a stark warning — especially from someone who also cautioned earlier in the interview that “our power to hurt each other has never been greater.”

He outlined two paths the country could take.

To Read More: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/economy/policy/articles/let-not-naive-ray-dalio-090500188.html

How Do I Manage This Much Money?

How Do I Manage This Much Money?

Moneywise   Fri, April 3, 2026

My mom was much richer than I realized, and left me more than I could have imagined. How do I manage this much money?  During the next 20 years or so, Americans will inherit an estimated $105 trillion as older Americans pass down their accumulated wealth to younger generations, in a phenomenon that has been dubbed the Great Wealth Transfer (1).  That means there will be a lot of people who are surprised — even if pleasantly so — to be inheriting money and unsure about how best to manage it.

Jeannie’s mother left her a substantial legacy. While her family was comfortable during her childhood, she had no idea that her parents were scrupulous savers and investors. Now, in addition to her childhood home, which is worth approximately $1.5 million, she has inherited a portfolio of investments worth $6 million.

Jeannie is shocked to find that her mother was so wealthy — and that she now has to manage real wealth for the first time in her life. While Jeannie was unprepared for her legacy, she also doesn’t want to waste this opportunity to improve her life now and in the future.

Here’s what Jeannie could have done to avoid this situation in the first place, and what to do if you find yourself in a similar place.

How To Have ‘The Talk’ With Your Parents

This problematic situation stems from a lack of communication around estate planning.

It’s a pretty common issue, too. In fact, the 2025 Family and Finance Study by Fidelity found that while 97% of families acknowledge the importance of talking about estate planning, almost half of those asked hadn’t actually had the conversation yet (2).

However, although so many older Americans may avoid talking about their estate plans, the adult children of this cohort are equally responsible for opening the conversation. Even if it may be awkward, it helps to frame the discussion as your desire to help them distribute their estate the way they want.

In other words, Jeannie and her mother might have avoided this situation altogether if they had sat down and had the conversation beforehand.

It’s also important to know that it doesn’t have to be a one-and-done talk. The conversation can come as part of a larger discussion about health care, a parent’s decision about aging in place or moving to assisted living and their last wishes for legacy planning.

There are several recommended approaches to carrying out this kind of conversation. For example, The New York Times recommends discussing a parent’s current health, medical history and living arrangements, while also designating a point person in the family to carry out their wishes (3).

Elsewhere, SSHK Law recommends that if your parents hesitate or avoid the conversation about end-of-life wishes, you can reassure them that you want to honor their choices, not take control of their estate (4).

In this way, by breaking up the conversation into a series of smaller discussions, you can help ease anxiety and tension.

Managing A Windfall With Professional Advice

Now that Jeannie has inherited her legacy, she has to start looking forward into the future rather than thinking about the past. In this respect, she is at least lucky that she has the time to make thoughtful choices about how to use the money her mother left behind.

She Can Also Seek Out Advice.

Whenever your financial situation changes substantively, as it did for Jeannie, it’s always a good idea to consult a professional. A financial advisor can guide you through some of the best ways to invest your inheritance to meet your goals — and advise you on the tax and legal implications.

For example, income from certain assets could bump you into a higher tax bracket. Additionally, an inherited IRA might be subject to the 10-year rule, meaning you have to withdraw all the funds within 10 years of the original account owner’s death (5).

To Read More:  https://www.yahoo.com/finance/markets/articles/mom-much-richer-realized-left-120000825.html

5 Subtly Genius Things All Wealthy People Do With Their Money

5 Subtly Genius Things All Wealthy People Do With Their Money — That You Should Do, Too

These moves don’t have to be reserved for the super rich.

t can feel like the super wealthy have access to some secret money playbook the rest of us never got. And in a way, that’s true. They have connections and access that most of us simply will never have.

But there’s good news: A lot of things the ultra wealthy do with their money are perfectly accessible to us — we just have to be smart enough to take advantage.

These are some of the most subtly genius things all rich people do with their money. The best part? You can do them, too.

1. They Protect Their Portfolio With Precious Metals

If the past few years have shown us anything, it’s that disruptions to the market can come out of nowhere. Between the pandemic, supply-chain issues and bear markets, a lot of people’s retirement savings felt the impact.

That’s why it can be a smart idea to look for ways to protect your retirement savings from the unpredictable. For a lot of people, investing in precious metals is a way to diversify and protect their investments.

One way to do this is with a precious metals IRA through a company like GoldCo. Precious metals often outperform other investments in a volatile market, and their value tends to rise with inflation, making them an effective hedge during uncertain economic times.

Opening a gold or silver IRA is easy, and you can roll over funds from existing retirement accounts. Or you can buy gold and silver directly from GoldCo’s extensive collection.

Worried you may need to sell your precious metals in the future? Goldco offers a buy back program and will purchase your assets back from you at the highest price. Plus, GoldCo has an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau.

Want to diversify and safeguard your investments by adding gold and silver to your portfolio? It’s easy to get started here and get your free kit.

2. They Use a Financial Advisor. You Can Get Matched With One for Free

The super wealthy didn’t get that way by mistake. They’re smart: They know how valuable it is to get an expert’s help with their money. The professionals simply know things we don’t.

But for the rest of us, getting a financial advisor sounds expensive and tedious. That’s why we like a company called Unbiased. They’ll match you with a financial advisor in your area — for free.

No two people have the same financial situation, which is why Unbiased matches you with the best financial advisor for your specific situation, so you get an expert in the areas you need.

There’s no obligation to hire the advisor, and Unbiased screens every advisor to make sure you’re only getting matched with the best experts.

3. They Know You Can Get $340/Year in Cash Back on Gas and Other Things You Already Buy

The super wealthy know the devil is in the details — that’s why so many of them keep a close eye on every dollar they spend. It’s something any of us can do by using a free cash-back app like Upside.

Upside pays you cash back when you fill up at the pump and buy other things you already need, like groceries and even meals at restaurants — frequent users earn an average of $340 per year.

Once you download and install the free app, just browse its more than 50,000 participating grocery stores, restaurants and best of all, gas stations, to find a cash-back offer near you. These are always changing, but we’ve seen up to 24 cents back per gallon.

 Claim the offer you want and buy your items with your usual debit or credit card. After, check in with Upside to verify your purchase. Upside will verify your purchase and then add the cash back to your Upside account (this can take up three business days). Then you can cash out directly to your bank account, or via PayPal or gift card.

Upside pays its users $1 million each week, and the app has a 4.7 star rating from more than 250,000 reviews. Just download the free app to see how much cash back you can earn on gas, food and other things you already have to buy.

To Continue and Read More:‍ ‍https://www.gobankingrates.com/genius-wealthy-people-know-2058491/?utm_term=related_link_2&utm_campaign=1268537&utm_source=yahoo.com&utm_content=4&utm_medium=rss