Your Bank’s Wealth Management Services Can Grow Your Assets

Your Bank’s Wealth Management Services Can Grow Your Assets — Here’s How

Yaël Bizouati-Kennedy   Tue, September 10, 2024  GOBankingRates

Wealth management services offered by banks are generally reserved for high-net-worth individuals. While the minimum amount of investable assets varies by bank or institution, it’s typically at least in the hundreds of thousands of dollars — if not millions. These services encompass a wide range of financial planning, such as retirement, investment, taxes or accounting. In other words, these services help you grow your wealth.

Now, for mainstream consumers to get services and products normally reserved for high-net-worth customers it pays to speak up and ask for them, said Bobbi Rebell, CFP and personal finance expert at CardRates.com.

 “Be your own best advocate,” said Rebell. “For example, even if they don’t have the minimum balance, the consumer can point to their long history with the financial institution as a qualification for a higher status and the benefits that come with that.”

Rebell added that these individuals should also make sure they are fully aware of the services they are already entitled to because many people don’t use services they already qualify for simply because they are not advertised.

Here are services that can help you grow your assets, according to experts.

Check Different Savings Options Available

One of the best things you can do to leverage your bank’s wealth management resources is to gain a full understanding of all their product offerings and financial services, said Erika Kullberg, attorney, personal finance expert and founder of Erika.com.

To start, check out their different savings vessels to see which can offer you the best savings rates.

As Kullberg noted, some banks provide customers with access to traditional or high-yield savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit (CDs).

“While you take your time researching and making a long-term financial plan to grow your assets, keep your cash safe in whichever savings vehicle can help you grow your cash the fastest,” she said. “Often this is a CD, but that also makes your money less accessible. You need to balance growth with liquidity.”

Look At Investment and Brokerage Accounts

As Cliff Ambrose, FRC, founder and wealth manager at Apex Wealth noted, leveraging your bank’s wealth management services can be a powerful way to grow your assets and achieve your financial goals.

For instance, he said, banks offer a range of tools and products designed to enhance various aspects of your financial life.

These can include investment accounts such as individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and brokerage accounts, which can provide tax advantages and access to diverse investment opportunities.

https://news.yahoo.com/news/finance/news/bank-wealth-management-services-grow-150059799.html

Fiduciary Vs. Financial Advisor: How These Types Of Advisors Compare

Fiduciary Vs. Financial Advisor: How These Types Of Advisors Compare

James Royal, Ph.D. Mon, September 9, 2024 Bankrate

It’s easy to get tripped up when it comes to the world of financial advisors, and distinguishing fiduciaries from non-fiduciaries can be challenging. But when you’re looking for financial advice, then having a fiduciary on your side can help you get the expertise and direction that’s best for your situation, making it a better fit than a financial advisor who is not a fiduciary.

Here are the differences between a fiduciary and a financial advisor and what you need to know.

What Is A Fiduciary?

A fiduciary is someone in a position of trust over the affairs of another. It comes from the Latin word fiduci, which means trust. A fiduciary is bound by law or oath to put their client’s interests ahead of their own, meaning those who engage a fiduciary should be able to fully trust them.

A fiduciary could be anyone with expertise — such as a lawyer, trustee or financial advisor — who must advise a client on the best way to proceed or otherwise act on their behalf.

What Is A Financial Advisor?

A financial advisor provides a range of advice and services around your financial life, including planning for retirement, managing your investments, preparing a budget, estate planning and much more. A financial advisor can construct a financial plan to help you grow your wealth.

Financial advisor is a catch-all term that includes many different kinds of advisors. There are those focused on specific areas such as investment advisors or wealth managers, or those with certain certifications such as specialists holding a certified financial planner (CFP) credential. The term may even include salespeople acting in the interest of a large financial institution who is looking to sell potential clients on the benefits of their products and services.

What Is The Difference Between A Financial Advisor And Fiduciary?

The roles of a fiduciary and a financial advisor may overlap in some ways, but may be dissimilar in other key dimensions. Here are a few of the biggest differences:

Duty Of Care

A fiduciary has a high duty of care for clients, meaning that a fiduciary must always put a client’s interests ahead of their own. In contrast, a financial advisor may only have to act according to a suitability standard, meaning that advice or products must be suitable to clients, rather than the best for their individual financial situation.

Area Of Practice

A fiduciary is a term that crosses domains, meaning that it can be used in areas besides finance. For example, lawyers are fiduciaries, as are the directors of a corporation, relative to its shareholders. In contrast, financial advisors concern themselves with issues related to assisting individuals in managing their money.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/fiduciary-vs-financial-advisor-types-221830260.html

Why So Few People Feel Secure About Money

Why So Few People Feel Secure About Money — Even When They Have Lots of It

And why the neighbors of lottery winners are often worse off.

Yahoo Creator  Sean Kernan  June 21, 2024

I’m not rich by any means. But I’ve done well enough to be comfortable, mostly because I saved aggressively early in my career. Yet I still feel like I’m only a stone’s throw from being in poverty, which is slightly irrational.  I remember having no money and having to budget until my next paycheck or risk groveling to my parents for help. It wasn’t a good life. And it still feels like yesterday, even though so many years have passed. Sadly, many people feel this way.

And to some extent — this stress can be constructive. It can mitigate risky spending. You’ll certainly never catch me with problematic expensive hobbies. But I wish I could feel more at ease about my station in life. Many of my friends are in this same psychological boat too. My buddy Brian is a software engineer, who has been making north of $180K per year — for years on end — while living in a low-cost area, and he’s still as cheap as he’s ever been.

So Why Are We Like This? How Do We Level Up And Counteract This Financial Anxiety?

The Origins Of The Problem

People tend to downgrade their financial standing. For example, per a survey by the financial firm Ameriprise Financial, only 13% of American millionaires classify themselves as wealthy. Even among those who had more than $5M in total assets — many still said they didn’t feel rich.

These weren’t people living in Silicon Valley, where $5M only gets you a shack. These were everyday people from all around the United States — still feeling underfunded.

Part of this is because of the disappearance of pensions — and fear that we’ll live on our savings and social security to get us through to old age. Both of my grandfathers had pensions, with one of them having two full separate pensions (military and government). But we are now the 401K generation — in a system that is more stressful than ever.

Why do people who have so much still feel sad about their financial standing?

Elizabeth Dunn, psychology professor at The University of British Columbia, and co-author of Happy Money: The Science of Happier Spending, looked into this very question. She found that social comparison, in particular, drives much of our financial dissatisfaction.

How we compare our income to others of similar age, education, and region of residence, greatly shapes our self-perceptions and satisfaction. Unsurprisingly, those who compared themselves to groups of higher income, tended to be less happy and more anxious about money.

Unfortunately, a majority of people tend to do upward comparisons. The severity of this impact was most notable: “The income of the reference group is about as important as one’s own income for individual happiness.”

It pains me to admit it: I’m 100% a victim of this statistic. I often watch videos of lavish mansion tours on YouTube, despite knowing the likelihood of me ever owning such a property is slim (unless I somehow write the next iteration of Atomic Habits).

But I still enjoy oohing and aahing over the stunning architecture, classy furniture and paintings hanging on the walls. It’s entirely possible this admiration is only heightening my anxiety about money.

Yet I know as well as you that the person in that mansion isn’t likely to be happier than the rest of us. Within a year of becoming rich, or facing tragedy, the vast majority of people return to their baseline happiness.

What’s most telling is that winning the lottery can significantly impact your neighbor’s wellbeing. One study in Canada found that as the magnitude of someone’s lottery winnings went up, their neighbors odds of financial distress and borrowing increased alongside it.

TO READ MORE:  https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/story/why-so-few-people-feel-secure-about-money--even-when-they-have-lots-of-it-212029309.html

How To Manage A Major Financial Windfall

How To Manage A Major Financial Windfall

Danielle Antosz   Updated Mon, September 9, 2024  Moneywise

Virginia dad gives son $1M winning lottery ticket as wedding gift — how to manage a major financial windfall

Most newlyweds expect stand mixers, silverware, or new sheets as traditional wedding gifts. But for bride-and-groom Kiana and Aaron Andrews of Prince William County, Virginia, they received something a lot more valuable.

Just before their April wedding, Aaron's father, a frequent lottery player, purchased a ticket for the Virginia Lottery's Cash4Life draw — and won. He had the choice of either $1,000 every week for the rest of his life, or a $1 million lump sum payout.

But rather than cashing out the ticket, Aaron’s father decided to give the winning ticket to his son as a wedding gift. His dad jokingly told Fox 5, "This was the best way to get him out of my basement."

Prior to receiving the ticket, Aaron and Kiana had decided to move in with Aaron’s father to help them save money. But now, with the help of a financial adviser, they've decided to take the lump-sum payment of $1 million, which allows them to help out Aaron's grandmother, set up college funds for their future children, and, one day, buy a home.

"I have a great father who has done nothing but look out for me!" Aaron told Virginia Lottery officials as he redeemed the ticket.

Lump Sum Vs. Weekly Annuity Payments

After speaking with a financial adviser, Aaron and Kiana decided to accept the $1 million lump sum cash payout rather than receive $1,000 every week for the rest of their lives. There are several benefits of taking the lump sum.

The $1,000-a-week payment only lasts as long as Aaron is alive. If he happens to die at a young age, for example, the payouts would cease and couldn’t be passed on to his heirs. However, taking the cash payout means he has access to the funds now.

It’s also worth considering that, while $1,000 a week sounds like a lot, the value of that money will change over time due to inflation.

TO READ MORE:  https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/virginia-dad-gives-son-1m-100400194.html

Shocker: Iran Funneling Billions Through the Fed’s System

Shocker: Iran Funneling Billions Through the Fed’s System 

Notes From The Field By James Hickman / Simon Black September 9, 2024

When I was a kid growing up in the 1980s, my father used to go every summer for two weeks of military training as part of his commitment to the US Army Reserve. And whenever he flew home, we would always meet him at the airport.

But back then, my mom, sister, and I could all go straight through security and sit at the gate to wait for him. In fact that was normal all the way through the late 1990s.

Then, of course, everything changed after 9/11. The federal government took over airport security overnight, and for the past 23 years, we’ve been taking off our shoes, getting fondled by federal agents, and throwing away our liquids.

More than two decades after 9/11, most of these TSA Security rules (the majority of which have been adopted around the world) seem pretty stupid.

Does anyone honestly believe that a 3.4 ounce tube of toothpaste is OK, but 3.5 ounces of toothpaste is a security threat?

This is the kind of idiotic logic behind rules that add unnecessary inconvenience to people’s lives, without providing any discernible benefit.

The same thing applies to those ridiculous consent forms on countless websites across the Internet. Whenever we visit a site we are now forced to “accept cookies”, thanks to a law passed by the European Union’s most idiotic politicians.

They somehow think we are all safer and better off... and that our privacy is protected.

Except that our privacy isn’t protected. Mark Zuckerberg and the Google guys are still following us around the Internet watching everything we do and click. Not to mention the governments themselves grab our biometric and personal data, shove it all in a database, then leave it prone to breach by hackers.

But hey, at least we have those cookie notifications to keep our data safe, right?

It’s just another stupid rule that inconveniences people, without providing any discernible benefit.

Banking is another great example.

Some people aren’t old enough to remember, but it used to be a pretty simple process to open a bank account. You’d show up, sign some papers, and you were done. Now, we’re all threatened with imprisonment, forced to fill out a million forms, and every single transaction is scrutinized under anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism regulations.

The entire apparatus treats you like a criminal suspect rather than a valued customer. And for what?

Turns out, it’s all for nothing.

Laws like FATCA, CRS, and the USA PATRIOT Act were supposedly passed, at least in part, to cut off terrorist groups from the global financial system.

But all the regulators missed that Iran– a nation that has been blacklisted by the global financial system– sent hundreds of millions of dollars to Hamas– a blacklisted terrorist organization. And then Hamas used that money to kill innocent Israeli civilians on October 7, 2023.

The US President himself agreed to release $6 billion in frozen funds to Iran for the release of a handful of Americans. So again, what exactly is the point of all that scrutiny in the financial system?

My mother has to jump through all sorts of hoops to prove that she’s not a criminal just to withdraw some cash from her bank account. But Hamas and the Taliban get hundreds of millions of dollars funneled to them, through the US banking system.

The latest example is actually the Iraqi banking system—which was set up in part by the US government after the 2003 invasion.

Top officials from the US Department of Treasury and Federal Reserve helped oversee the establishment of Iraq’s new financial system, including the anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering controls.

Well, big shocker, it turns out that the Iraqi banking system, i.e. the system set up by the US government, was used by terrorist groups to send money to Iran and to Hamas.

So once again, what exactly is the point of all these rules and regulations, which inconvenience regular, law-abiding citizens... if groups like Hamas can still receive ample funding through the system. It’s obvious the rules are pointless and have no real benefit.

The irony here is that so many governments around the world, including the US, are some of the most outspoken opponents of cryptocurrency.

The US Treasury Department hates crypto. They say it is dangerous to have an unregulated monetary system where terrorists and drug cartels can operate with total privacy.

Yet the very banking system that THEY established is what’s actually funding terrorists.

Everyone else has to suffer through daily friction and be treated like criminals, just to send some money from point A to point B; withdrawing $5,000 in cash brings a bureaucratic shock and awe.

And this is one of the biggest reasons why I think it makes sense to own crypto.

I’m not a crypto fanatic by any means. I don’t own it to speculate on the price. And most days, in fact, I don’t know the price of Bitcoin or Ether. Nor do I care.

To me there’s no point in trading dollars for crypto, only hoping to trade crypto back for more dollars. The larger idea is that crypto represents a way to send and receive funds outside of a system run by incompetent bureaucrats who constantly make our lives worse.

It’s similar to my belief that gold makes sense as a long-term store of value; I don’t trust the Federal Reserve or the White House with preserving the value of my savings. Gold is a great way to do so... without having to rely on the financial system.

With both crypto and gold, there’s no intermediary or incompetent bureaucrat standing in the middle.

That’s also why I’ve never seen any reason to debate which is better, gold vs crypto. There’s no reason to argue about it.

Both serve a useful purpose, and both are worth considering as part of any sensible Plan B.

To your freedom,  James Hickman  Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign LLC

PS-

If you’re not sure how to get started on a Plan B, check out Schiff Sovereign: Premium, it’s packed with incredible insights, including both Plan B strategies and compelling investment research. It’s a highly educational, month-by-month guide that is designed to help you navigate the world from a position of strength, both personally and financially.

https://www.schiffsovereign.com/trends/shocker-iran-funneling-billions-through-the-feds-system-151402/

Protecting Yourself From Both Scams And Tax Penalties

Protecting Yourself From Both Scams And Tax Penalties

Joe Cortez  Sun, September 8, 2024  Moneywise

California man loses life savings, owes more than $30K in taxes after falling prey to sophisticated scam

On top of losing his life savings to scammers, Chester Frilich of Concord, California is facing a tax bill of over $30,000 which could end in him losing his home.

As reported by ABC7 News, his problems began when he received a call from somebody claiming to be from Xfinity, who claimed his account was used to upload pornographic videos. An hour later, he heard from “Jason Brown” with the Federal Trade Commission, listing all of his credit cards and telling him he was under investigation for wire fraud.

In order to clear the issues, the scammers posing as the FTC said they would help him move his money to a “secure account,” which involved him sending thousands of dollars of gold and cash through couriers and UPS. He tapped into multiple accounts, including Certificate of Deposit (CD) and IRA accounts, to send over $200,000 in funds before the police informed him that it was all a scam.

By using those accounts to send money, Frilich amassed a tax burden of around $30,000, which will end in the IRS putting a lien on his home if he can’t pay the bill or work out an arrangement with the agency.

While losing money in a scam is awful, getting penalized on top of it makes it even worse. How can you guard yourself from tax problems as you try to avoid fraud?

Why Early Withdrawal Penalties Matter

While most bank and investing accounts are designed to hold “liquid” assets — defined as cash or assets that can be converted to cash quickly and easily — some accounts are structured to effectively “lock down” money to pay interest and dividends over an extended period of time and are not considered “liquid.” Examples include the two types of accounts Frilich pulled money from: Certificate of Deposit (CD) accounts and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs).

Both are designed to keep money locked for an extended period of time, but in different ways. A CD is offered by banks or credit unions as a savings option, where consumers agree to deposit their money for a specific period of time before they can make a withdrawal.

CD terms can range anywhere from one month all the way to five years. IRAs are investment accounts designed to help you save money for your retirement. The earliest one can withdraw money from an IRA without issue is when the account holder turns 59½.

Anyone withdrawing money from either of those accounts before they mature will face penalties. Under federal law, banks are allowed to charge penalties for early withdrawal of CDs.

While the minimum penalty is seven days of simple interest if the withdrawal is done within six days of deposit, a larger penalty can apply for early withdrawal at any other time during the term.

TO READ MORE: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/california-man-loses-life-savings-120300738.html

Three Key Trends That Will Shape the Future of America

Three Key Trends That Will Shape the Future of America

Notes From the Field By James Hickman / Simon Black  September 5, 2024

You wouldn’t be especially impressed by someone’s insight if they told you that the world today is full of turmoil. That’s obvious— from wars and cultural clashes to cost of living crises and a pervasive sense of negativity.

More impressive is that William Strauss and Neil Howe predicted that the 2020’s would be like this nearly three decades ago in their 1997 book, The Fourth Turning.

According to their theory, societies move through cycles approximately 80-100 years long, with each cycle divided into four distinct "turnings." These phases mirror the seasons, with the Fourth Turning representing the harsh winter—a period of upheaval and transformation.

Strauss and Howe predicted that the next Fourth Turning would begin in the mid-2000s, ignited by a crisis that would set the stage for significant societal change.

The 2008 global financial crisis marked the beginning of this period. Since then, governments and central banks have been in a constant state of crisis management, employing measures like low interest rates and increased government spending to prop up the faltering system.

Today, as Strauss and Howe foresaw, this phase is characterized by a collapse of trust in institutions that have dominated since the start of the current cycle, just after World War II.

From the media, to government bodies like the justice system and Federal Reserve, to global organizations like the UN and IMF, these institutions are increasingly viewed as ineffective, obsolete, or downright harmful.

Historically, Fourth Turnings are marked by intense turbulence, often culminating in major conflicts or transformative events, such as the Great Depression leading to World War II, or in the cycle before that, the American Civil War.

While history doesn’t have to repeat itself exactly, the growing dissatisfaction across the developed world is palpable. Issues like healthcare costs, immigration, and rising inequality fuel a sense that society is no longer functioning as it should.

This widespread discontent often leads to political upheaval. As voters lose faith in current leaders, new political movements and parties gain traction.

But none of these ‘saviors’ are going to win by promising to cut spending.

Until their hand is absolutely forced, politicians will continue to borrow and spend as much as they can in a desperate attempt to cling to power. But to be fair, the public is also to blame— they largely demand it.

As Howe writes in the sequel to the Fourth Turning which he published last year:

“Like addicts acquiring tolerance, policy-makers have backed themselves into a corner: The public braces itself for the dark hour when the Fed can no longer ease and Congress can no longer borrow no matter how badly the economy founders.”

This scenario highlights three key trends that are likely to shape the future:

1. Huge Deficit Spending

The US deficit reached nearly $2 trillion in 2023, a historic high outside of wartime or national emergency.

In theory there is no limit to the level the deficit can reach. After all, the US Government can issue the debt and the Federal Reserve can buy it all.

But the problems show up in the value of the US dollar. Not just against other currencies— other governments are devaluing their currencies in the same way. Instead, the value of what a dollar is worth, in terms of real goods and services that people need to buy, is diminished.

The Fed is acting right now as if the inflation problem is licked. But, given the trajectory of future deficit spending, we are really just in the opening stages of a larger, wider inflation problem.

2. Increasing Conflict

The intensity of global conflicts has escalated, particularly following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. This has accelerated a shift away from global trade and cooperation, as countries prioritize securing their own supply chains and others try furiously to develop parallel financial systems that leave them less vulnerable to the whims of US foreign policy.

This retreat from global integration is likely to increase tensions and create further instability.

3. Potential Monetary Resets

All of this leads to the potential for a monetary reset— typical during a Fourth Turning. The value of the reserve currency is being continuously debased and its status as a reserve currency can leave others vulnerable to the imposition of sanctions or even confiscation of their assets. That’s not sustainable.

There are so many possible permutations of how this could all play out that it’s difficult to say exactly what a global financial reset would look like right now.

But it would almost certainly mean the loss of the dollar’s global reserve status.

That is exactly why we always advocate having a Plan B, a solid backup plan to provide great optionality in tumultuous times.

That’s why we started Schiff Sovereign: Premium, a highly educational, month-by-month guide that is designed to help you navigate the world from a position of strength, both personally and financially.

In Schiff Sovereign Premium, we focus on what we think will work well amidst all the uncertainty, regardless of the sequence of events that occur.

It includes both Plan B strategies (such as maintaining your freedom of movement, and legally reducing your tax bill), as well as compelling investment research.

Our investment thesis focuses on real assets— the world’s most critical, valuable, and useful resources, as well as the businesses which produce them.

Real assets are a beneficiary of the huge debasement of currency that we are seeing. And right now, with central banks across the world starting to cut interest rates again, we should see that trend accelerate.

Gold in particular has already responded to the impending injection of liquidity that lower interest rates will bring, reaching all time highs on multiple occasions this year.

Gold mining stocks, however, haven’t yet followed suit... but are primed to do so. (In July’s issue, we explained why, and released research on two well-positioned companies in the gold mining industry.)

Commodities are also a beneficiary of the unfortunate trend of increasing conflict across the world. Not only are war-time economies typically inflationary, they also require a huge amount of industrial commodities.

But the chronic underinvestment in commodity supply over the past decade has set the stage for potential shortages. As these issues come to the fore, both prices and investment in production are likely to rise— a great opportunity for investors.

But even if these trends don’t play out exactly as expected, investing in companies that control some of the world’s most valuable real assets—especially including critical energy resources like natural gas and uranium—has very little downside.

To your freedom,  James Hickman   Co-Founder, Schiff Sovereign LLC

https://www.schiffsovereign.com/trends/three-key-trends-that-will-shape-the-future-of-america-151390/

6 Ways You Can Tell If a Recession Is Coming (And What To Do)

I’m an Economist: 6 Ways You Can Tell If a Recession Is Coming (And What To Do)

Laura Beck   Tue, September 3, 2024    GOBankingRates

Most people are worried about the economy, and the dreaded word “recession” is on many people’s lips. But how can you tell what’s actually happening and what’s not worth worrying about?

GOBankingRates spoke to economists and financial professionals to get the inside scoop on what’s going on in America right now. Here are six ways to tell if a recession is coming and what you can do about it.

Current Economic Outlook

Michael Faulkender, former assistant secretary for economic policy at the U.S. Department of Treasury and currently the dean’s professor of finance at the University of Maryland, provided a measured perspective.

“I do not think a recession is coming but I do think the recent slowdown will continue. There are parts of the economy that are not growing — manufacturing and housing are still struggling,” he outlined. “Other parts like healthcare and government spending are still expanding. The outcome is overall anemic growth, but not yet decline. What the economy looks like one to two years from now depends mightily on the economic policies implemented following the election.”

However, Albert “Pete” Kyle, distinguished university professor at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, offered a more cautious view.

“Altogether, risks are tilted towards a recession coming either later this year or next year, but it is not as obvious that this will occur as it was in 2007 or 2000,” he said. “Currently, there are some stresses in the banking system. Banks and non-bank investors are sitting on bad loans related to commercial real estate, particularly shopping malls and commercial office space. These stresses are significant. Compared to the 2008 financial crisis, they are better recognized and probably not as severe.”

Kyle also pointed out another concerning factor — the stock market.

“The stock market is currently at a very high level as a multiple of GDP,” the professor shared. “While earnings are strong, it is not clear whether for how long these high earnings will continue into the future. If there is a decline in corporate earnings, stock prices could fall a great deal.”

Professor Jonathan Ernest of Case Western Reserve University offered a more optimistic perspective. “Currently, the labor market has remained relatively strong, the rate of inflation has decreased, and GDP continues to grow year-over-year. None of these measures would traditionally signal an imminent recession.”

6 Key Recession Indicators

Given these differing views, what signs should we be watching for? Here are six key indicators highlighted by our experts.

Yield Curve Inversion and Steepening

Abe Askil, CEO at Titan Capital Managers, pointed to a historically reliable indicator.

TO READ MORE: https://news.yahoo.com/news/finance/news/m-economist-6-ways-tell-170258745.html

Regulation D And Savings Account Withdrawal Limits – Here’s What Changed

Regulation D And Savings Account Withdrawal Limits – Here’s What Changed

Matthew Goldberg  Tue, September 3, 2024   Bankrate

Key takeaways

Regulation D sets reserve requirements for banks and credit unions, and it previously limited the amount of certain types of withdrawals and transfers consumers could make to six.

During the coronavirus pandemic, the limitation was lifted.

Some financial firms now allow consumers to make more than six withdrawals and transfers from deposit accounts while others have maintained the pre-2020 rule.

While banks historically limited the number of transactions that customers could make each month in savings and money market accounts, a pandemic-era rule change means you may now have easier access to your funds.

Regulation D, or Reg. D, is a Federal Reserve Board rule that previously limited withdrawals and transfers to six each statement cycle. The Fed revised the rule, but many banks have maintained the six-transaction limit. Others have increased the number of allowable withdrawals and transfers.

What is Regulation D?

Reg. D imposed reserve requirements on a bank’s deposits and other liabilities, with the purpose of implementing monetary policy, according to the Federal Reserve. In March 2020, reserve requirements at banks were reduced to zero percent and they’ve remained at zero for more than three years.

Reg. D also restricted the frequency of certain types of withdrawals and transfers you could make from a savings deposit account during a statement cycle. Banks no longer have to limit the number of certain withdrawals from a savings deposit account to six, but most do still restrict withdrawals on these accounts.

How Has Regulation D Changed?

In April 2020 — as Americans began to navigate the economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic — the Fed deleted the six certain transfer or withdrawal limits from the definition of savings deposit accounts via an interim final rule.

Some banks took the Fed up on the rule change by eliminating the withdrawal limits. American Express National Bank, for example, previously allowed nine withdrawals per statement cycle, for example. Now, it doesn’t have withdrawal limits on its savings account.

The Fed’s move was termed an interim final rule, which is issued when there’s good cause to skip issuing a proposed rule, says Scott Birrenkott, assistant director of legal at the Wisconsin Bankers Association.

Still, the proposal isn’t yet set in stone.

“The Fed still hasn’t issued a final rule,” Birrenkott says. “So, some banks are still waiting for that final piece to kind of see. I know that some banks are curious whether that might change or something might be reversed, because it can be a big step to adjust all of their policies and procedures.”

Types Of Transactions Impacted By Reg. D

TO READ MORE:  https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/regulation-d-savings-account-withdrawal-195856860.html

High-Yield Savings Account Vs. Treasury Bill: Which Is Right For You?

High-Yield Savings Account Vs. Treasury Bill: Which Is Right For You?

Sarah C. Brady·Contributor  Updated Tue, September 3, 2024  Yahoo Personal Finance

Both can be a great option for your savings, depending on your goals.

It was not too long ago that low-risk investments like Treasury bills were the underdogs of the financial world. While T-bills provide a safe place to store your savings while earning a fixed interest rate, they were simply not worth the low returns they offered — especially when compared to the flexibility of savings accounts.

Then, in 2022, something unusual happened: Interest rates started increasing, and they just kept on shooting upward, until the rates on some T-bills, and even savings accounts, passed 5%.

In 2024, anyone who wants to earn a competitive rate on their short-to-mid-term savings would be wise to consider both as options. Which one is best for you: A high-yield savings account or Treasury bill? The answer mainly depends on when you need your money back.

What is a high-yield savings account?

A savings account is a bank account designed to help you save money. These accounts typically earn more interest than checking accounts do, and they're very low risk since most banks insure your deposits up to $250,000.

The downside? Most savings accounts don’t pay much; the national average savings account rate is just 0.46% today. You might earn more interest by leaving your money in a time-bound account like a T-bill or CD, or by investing in the market. Inflation is also likely to outpace your earnings on a savings account.

One way to maximize what you earn on your savings is to use a high-yield savings account (HYSA). These accounts work just like traditional savings account, except they can offer rates as high as 5% APY or more.

See our picks for the 10 best high-yield savings accounts available today>>

What is a Treasury bill?

Buying a Treasury bill is sort of like making a loan to the U.S. government. T-bills pay you guaranteed interest based on the length of time you invest your money. Rates currently range from 4.23% to 5.27% with terms of four to 52 weeks. You can sell a T-bill before the maturity date, but you'll lose some of the interest you would have earned otherwise.

TO READ MORE:

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/personal-finance/high-yield-savings-account-vs-treasury-bill-140005833.html

Here’s Why Having 2 or 3 Bank Accounts Isn’t Enough,

Here’s Why Having 2 or 3 Bank Accounts Isn’t Enough, According to Money Expert Martin Lewis

Vance Cariaga   Mon, September 2, 2024  GOBankingRates

Although there are vast differences in the amount of wealth Americans have amassed, one thing almost everyone has in common is a banking relationship. Nearly 96% of U.S. households have a checking or savings account at a bank or credit union, according to the latest FDIC data.

Research from Consumer Affairs showed that the average consumer had a total of 5.3 accounts across financial institutions as recently as 2019, though many have only one or two.

More Bank Accounts Could Mean Better Money Management

If you belong to the latter group, then financial guru Martin Lewis recommends adding more accounts. Lewis, founder of the UK-based MoneySavingExpert website, recently said on his podcast that you might benefit from having 10 accounts or more, The Express reported. He compared savings accounts to a “tower of champagne glasses” where you fill one glass and then move on to the next.

“The perfect way to save is you pour your money into the account that pays the most,” Lewis said. “It might be tax-free, it might be because it only allows a small amount. Once you fill that, you trickle down to the next level then trickle down to the next level.”

He conceded that this system is not necessarily for everyone — mainly because it requires hard work to stay on top of it.

“The biggest sin in savings is that most decent rates only last for a year or so and then you have to be on top of it to ditch and switch when it ends,” Lewis added. “It’s only for the type of people who will be constantly on top of it, maybe even modelling it through a spreadsheet to manage it well. Most people want a simpler solution with two, three, maybe four accounts at most but not going into 10 different accounts.”

TO READ MORE:  https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/why-having-2-3-bank-200019928.html