Dr. Scott Young: Will the IRS Turn into the ERS on April 2?
Dr. Scott Young: Will the IRS Turn into the ERS on April 2?
3-31-2025
For years, the idea of abolishing the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was relegated to the fringes of political discourse. But recently, the idea has gained traction, even entering mainstream conversations. Dr. Scott Young, a voice advocating for the IRS’s elimination, has been discussing this possibility for half a decade.
Now, he’s witnessing a growing chorus of voices echoing his concerns. But what’s driving this surge in anti-IRS sentiment, and what are the arguments fueling the debate?
One central argument revolves around the constitutionality of the IRS and its interpretation of the 16th Amendment. This amendment, ratified in 1913, grants Congress the power to “lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”
Critics argue that the IRS has overstepped its bounds in interpreting this amendment, leading to an intrusive and overly complicated tax system that exceeds the original intent.
The debate often centers on the terms “External Revenue Service” versus “Internal Revenue Service.” While the latter is the official name, some argue that the IRS’s reach extends beyond purely internal matters, impacting individuals’ economic freedoms and personal liberties in a way that aligns more closely with an “External” revenue agency. This distinction, though subtle, reflects a deeper concern about the agency’s power and scope.
Beyond constitutional and political arguments, some also bring a religious perspective to the debate. While a direct biblical mandate against taxation is difficult to find, proponents of abolishing the IRS often cite passages that emphasize personal responsibility, limited government, and the right to property.
They argue that the IRS’s extensive taxation practices conflict with these principles, hindering individuals’ ability to provide for their families and contribute to their communities.
However, it’s crucial to consider the counter-arguments as well. Proponents of the IRS argue that it is a necessary tool for funding essential government services, such as national defense, infrastructure, and social programs. They argue that without a centralized tax collection agency like the IRS, the government would be unable to fulfill its responsibilities to its citizens. They also point to the potential for increased inequality and social instability if the tax system were dismantled.
Moreover, the complexity of modern society necessitates a sophisticated tax system that can adapt to changing economic realities. Abolishing the IRS, they argue, would create chaos and undermine the financial stability of the nation.
The complexities and nuances of the debate surrounding the IRS are undeniable. It encompasses constitutional interpretations, concerns about individual liberties, and differing perspectives on the role of government. While the call to abolish the IRS may be gaining momentum, it is important to engage with the issue thoughtfully, considering both the potential benefits and the potential consequences of such a radical change.
Ultimately, the future of the IRS and the American tax system will depend on a robust and informed public discourse that weighs the competing perspectives and considers the long-term implications of any proposed reforms. This is a conversation that demands careful consideration and balanced judgment.
https://dinarchronicles.com/2025/03/31/dr-scott-young-will-the-irs-turn-into-the-ers-on-april-2/
